RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Kalra, Ashwani
DynaValidator forms stores data in Hashmap internally if you dont want to define norma action forms. -Original Message- From: Antony Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:40 PM To: struts Subject: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? Hi, Is there

RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Navjot Singh
I can't say there will be any move or not. But MAP backed ActionForms are alreadt there, If you are not interested in using the actionforms and be contended with just hashmaps. Mostly, not always, I treat ActionForm as HashMap but with getter setter already classcasted and defined for properties.

Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Antony Paul
- From: Kalra, Ashwani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? DynaValidator forms stores data in Hashmap internally if you dont want to define norma action forms

RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Fullam, Jonathan
That's where a map-backed Hashmap is useful. -Original Message- From: Antony Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:02 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? I know that but one have to define 10 to 30 elements

Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Antony Paul
, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? That's where a map-backed Hashmap is useful. -Original Message- From: Antony Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:02 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: When HashMap

RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Trieu, Danny
] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:43 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? I can't say there will be any move or not. But MAP backed ActionForms are alreadt there, If you are not interested in using the actionforms and be contended with just

RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Hookom, Jacob
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? I don't want to offense any one, and all though HashMap or DynaWhatever are convenience, but isn't it anti OO? Meaning there are no type checking, and you are just passing a bag of chunk around? Danny Trieu Internet

Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Guido García Bernardo
, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:38 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? I don't want to offense any one, and all though HashMap or DynaWhatever are convenience, but isn't it anti OO? Meaning there are no type

Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Gus Heck
In my experience (with Ant mostly) the best way to get anything started in an apache project is with a patch submitted in the bugzilla :) Gus Antony Paul wrote: Hi, Is there any move to support HashMap in place of ActionForm ?. I dont want to start any argument. I have read a lot on

Re: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?

2003-12-10 Thread Ted Husted
username. possible ? rgds Antony Paul. - Original Message - From: Fullam, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ? That's where a map-backed Hashmap is useful