Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS with SD cards irregularities

2009-08-09 Thread Bill Kerr
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Sascha Silbe wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:11:31PM +0930, Bill Kerr wrote: >> >> The sticks I have with SD cards have started to fail on the older >>> computers >>> at school (after working ok for 2 weeks of lessons). But they s

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS-for-XO-1 image

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:14:12PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: > Adventurous people can copy-nand: > > http://people.sugarlabs.org/~mtd/soas-xo1/soasxo50.{img,crc} This is quite close to usable! * It mounts USB keys. * Sound works. * The font size is tolarable. The only critical bug I found af

[Sugar-devel] [Physics] egg libraries sorted -- Journal JSON saving addition, then release?

2009-08-09 Thread Brian Jordan
Hi all, I manually included pkg_resources.py from setuptools so that pythons < 2.6.x would still be supported using the .egg libraries. Then released and included new Elements (0.13) which is Asaf's JSON changes. Gary or others -- can you test that the .egg-fest I committed works on SoaS (python

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS-for-XO-1 image (was Re: Who's interestedin testing a new installer for SoaS?)

2009-08-09 Thread S Page
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Art Hunkins wrote: > Is there any other way in which the XO-1 will ever be updated (in respect to > Sugar) - beyond build 802? Future passive voice and open source together have infinite possibilities ;-) If you read http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Future_releases : "OLP

Re: [Sugar-devel] #1146 UNSP: (Default) Text is too small. This can be easily seen even on the (SoaS) login screen.

2009-08-09 Thread Walter Bender
I am curious as to how Turtle Art behaves in your tests. (I include a scaling factor which is different for non-OLPC-XO displays.) -walter On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Art Hunkins wrote: > This happens on all text (i.e., not-image) display, to my knowledge. > > Obvious examples are the Log and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-09 Thread S Page
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Sugar currently doesn't even > have support for the library bundle technology which was adopted by > various sugar deployments, as it doesn't have a way of accessing the > index.html pages short of typing in the file path in Browse. (the > func

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > I got the same failure with the Strawberry release. Has anybody realized > > success with Option 3? > > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Installation/OLPC > > I wasn't aware of the f

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS-for-XO-1 image (was Re: Who's interestedin testing a new installer for SoaS?)

2009-08-09 Thread Art Hunkins
Is there any other way in which the XO-1 will ever be updated (in respect to Sugar) - beyond build 802? Art Hunkins - Original Message - From: "Martin Dengler" To: "Sebastian Dziallas" Cc: ; "Joshua N Pritikin" Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 3:14 PM Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS-for-XO

Re: [Sugar-devel] #1146 UNSP: (Default) Text is too small. This can be easily seen even on the (SoaS) login screen.

2009-08-09 Thread Art Hunkins
This happens on all text (i.e., not-image) display, to my knowledge. Obvious examples are the Log and Terminal Activities. The most problemmatic examples are when text is used in a PyGTK boxed context (such as the 4 activities included in Victor Lazzarini's csndsugui project). Basically text a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] bender: new uplink change of IP, Aug 8 18:30 CEST

2009-08-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Sat, 08-08-2009 a las 18:00 +0200, Bernie Innocenti escribió: > We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that > 6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been. I added an A record for bender.sugarlabs.org alongside the existing record. Yesterday nigh

[Sugar-devel] SoaS-for-XO-1 image (was Re: Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?)

2009-08-09 Thread Martin Dengler
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Martin Dengler has been building special builds of SoaS for the XO, > which we should probably get out soon. Martin, what's the current state > of that, can we put 'em up? :) Adventurous people can copy-nand: http://people.

[Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-09 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, In response to the thread I started recently about feedback from deployments, I've been thinking a lot about specific changes/features that would be a big help for deployments. And even though it only takes 10 minutes in a classroom to see some real potential areas for improvement, actually I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Help: SoaS & Display Manager (Auto-Login)

2009-08-09 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Sorry, I was once again victim of GMail's interface and answered only to Sebastian instead of to the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 19:05 Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Help: SoaS & Display Manager (Auto-Login) To: Seb

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: >> A few lines up from the last boot message, it says: >> >> mount: unknown filesystem type 'jffs2' >> >> That can't be a good sign. This is indeed not a good sign. We've had this some time ago with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Help: SoaS & Display Manager (Auto-Login)

2009-08-09 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Ton van Overbeek wrote: > Regarding getting auto-login to work after restarting X. > > Yesterday I looked at the slim sources and it seems at first sight easy > to add auto login of the default user after the first login. > Any interest in me trying to implement this? > If we use an extra option to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > A few lines up from the last boot message, it says: > > mount: unknown filesystem type 'jffs2' > > That can't be a good sign. I got the same failure with the Strawberry release. Has anybody realized success with Option 3? htt

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:37:40PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:27:51PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > The answer is "no." Now I have an XO laptop that doesn't boot. It shows > > the XO man and that's it. How do I debug this? > > I held down the Check button s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:27:51PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > The answer is "no." Now I have an XO laptop that doesn't boot. It shows > the XO man and that's it. How do I debug this? I held down the Check button so I could see the boot messages. Maybe I haven't waited long enough. It stop

Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:14:21AM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > > I'm looking for some volunteers to test the hard disk installation with > > the latest SoaS snapshot and newly designed installer. > > I'm planning to load