On Thursday, 13 June 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard > 'cvml', 'gonz...@laptop.org');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter,
>>> t
On 13 June 2013 18:26, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>>
>> That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter,
>> than allow any random list of mime types.
>>
>
> I'm not sure to understand this. You are proposing to show all the file
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>>
>> That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter,
>> than allow any random list of mime types.
>>
>
> I'm not sure to understand this. You are proposing to show al
On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter,
> than allow any random list of mime types.
>
I'm not sure to understand this. You are proposing to show all the files
with mime types the activity can open right? That's pre
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 18:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
>>
>> Good. Yes I also think the object chooser dialog should display all
>> the entries that an activity can open. So looks like a bug, as
>> Gonzalo said.
>>
>>
> What should the filterin
On 13 June 2013 18:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
> Good. Yes I also think the object chooser dialog should display all
> the entries that an activity can open. So looks like a bug, as
> Gonzalo said.
>
>
What should the filtering combo display when we are filtered by a custom
list of mime types?
>
> Right, the Journal has filters for generic types like "Image", "Text",
> and for activities.
>
> I think each one has a good user case.
>
> Activity filter example: you are looking for the drawings you did but
> don't mind the pictures you took.
>
> Generic example: you are looking for an image
2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez :
> On 13 June 2013 18:14, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>
>> On 13 June 2013 18:12, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez :
>>> > On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the
>>> >>
On 13 June 2013 18:14, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 18:12, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez :
>> > On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity
>> >> selected can open?
>> >
>> >
>
On 13 June 2013 18:12, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez :
> > On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity
> >> selected can open?
> >
> >
> > I suspect the reason we are filtering by generic type
2013/6/13 Daniel Narvaez :
> On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity
>> selected can open?
>
>
> I suspect the reason we are filtering by generic type is just that the code
> was initially written for the journal, w
On 13 June 2013 17:58, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> What you think about switch to filter by all the mime type the activity
> selected can open?
>
I suspect the reason we are filtering by generic type is just that the code
was initially written for the journal, which exposes a filter by generic
type
Replaying to myself.
Filtering by activity have a problem right now: show the objects in the
journal filtered by activity.
While solve the Read problem, and probably is good for Jukebox,
is a problem by example for ImageViewer and Paint.
Both can open images, but like the Journal filter by activit
+1 this can be done with a few lines of CSS. Can be a good task for a
contributor to get in touch with the docs and CSS. Adding Suraj to
the CC. The recent change in sugar-web to make the toolbar always on
top can be a good reference.
2013/6/12 Daniel Narvaez :
> It's a bit annoying when you na
On Thursday, 13 June 2013, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> what you say makes sense for small-but-critical patches (like it happens
> in the linux-kernel world, where there is rarely a patch more than 10 lines
> long. Moreover, the linux-kernel code is cleanly segregated into different
> modules, s
Daniel,
what you say makes sense for small-but-critical patches (like it happens in
the linux-kernel world, where there is rarely a patch more than 10 lines
long. Moreover, the linux-kernel code is cleanly segregated into different
modules, so there are rarely clashes in people's work, as far as t
I am trying to solve AU ticket #2439 in a way than can be upstreamed.
The problem is with the limitations about how we define our generic mime
types.
In this case, "Text files" are defined as all the files than can be edited
by Write,
but that is not useful for Read, because can't open open office
On 13 June 2013 13:00, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> In our case, if we make our libraries licensed under Apache 2
> an activity author could use Apache 2 or GPL3 for his activity but not
> GPL2, correct?
>
That's my understanding yeah.
___
Sugar-devel mai
On 06/13/2013 11:29 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez :
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon,
my
vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for
On 13 June 2013 11:33, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> cc'ing Ajay
>
> On 13 June 2013 00:56, James Cameron wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:54:24AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> > Yes, but somebody should provide patches, and do any change needed
>> > when the maintainers do the review, to be sure
On 13 June 2013 07:56, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:54:24AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > Yes, but somebody should provide patches, and do any change needed
> > when the maintainers do the review, to be sure we have the quality
> > needed upstream.
>
> Maintainers could do
cc'ing Ajay
On 13 June 2013 00:56, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:54:24AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > Yes, but somebody should provide patches, and do any change needed
> > when the maintainers do the review, to be sure we have the quality
> > needed upstream.
>
> Maintai
On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez :
>>
>>> I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon,
>>> my
>>> vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
>>>
>>
On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez :
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, my
vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
I'm far from expert on licenses, but given Daniel Narvaez description,
I
24 matches
Mail list logo
