created/shared' and 'buddy joins activity'.
I think this would be a good way to implement it.
Emil Dudev
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014, Emil Dudev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:36 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:00:07AM +0200, Em
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:36 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:00:07AM +0200, Emil Dudev wrote:
> > The thing I'm facing is that there is telepathy 'magic' code both in
> > sugar's core and sugar's toolkit (per activity/process)
tyModel which just merges
> WebsocketNeighborhood and TelepathyNeighborhood (it should not be hard, it
> looks like a list of activities/buddies with signals for changes).
>
> Are there abstraction leaks that makes that impossible or problematic?
>
I'm not exactly sure about
hanges to gwebsockets, so it can have client functionality:
https://github.com/edudev/gwebsockets/
A web client that mirror's TogetherJS's server (it just replies the
messages): https://github.com/edudev/web-reply
Sugar (only neighborhood.py is important):
https://github.com/edudev/suga
will
still try to load it. The document ready event (or whatever the name was)
would not fire, until the file is loaded, or it times out (I think it was
about 40 seconds).
Emil Dudev
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently porting my
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 20 January 2014 13:53, Emil Dudev wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>
>>> * Why did you go with a separate web activity instead on integrating
>>> directly in the s
y to go. I don't believe
that I can decide what is best for sugar. It would be nice to know what the
community is thinking and what is their vision of how web collaboration
should be handled.
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
r-net and gtd-activity still use Mozilla's hub server for the
communication.
sugar-toolkit-gtk3:
https://github.com/edudev/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/tree/webcollaboration
sugar: https://github.com/edudev/sugar/tree/webcollaboration
gtd-activity: https://github.com/edudev/gtd-activity/tree/collaborat
oing multi platform, I'll
choose the second approach.
Emil Dudev
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Interesting! Are you planning to use a js actitvity or a python one as
> client?
>
>
> On 18 January 2014 01:21, Emil Dudev wrote:
>
>> Busy
ems with limited functionality.
About WebRTC: I really think that peer-to-peer connections are needed. But
at this point, I'll go with client-server connections.
gwebsockets: https://github.com/edudev/gwebsockets/tree/master
websocket-server: https://github.com/edudev/web-reply
Emil Dudev
O
reason. But if sugar's core is used, it
should be possible.
Emil Dudev
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> It might not come that easily but I think we need to support non-degraded
> collaboration between web activities inside Sugar. We don't need to
> int
twork adapter. But I think someone else took the task and
completed it.
Emil Dudev
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2014/1/6 Manuel Quiñones :
> > 2013/12/11 Gonzalo Odiard :
> >> +1
> >>
> >> The networking / collaboration stack is bi
spans.
Emil Dudev
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez :
> > The tag seems to be helpful to get designers attention :)
> >
> > On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
> >>
> >> Emil's code wo
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 11 January 2014 15:21, Emil Dudev wrote:
>
>> Can a similar web server be set up like jabber.sugarlabs.org is?
>>
>
> Do you mean if it's possible to setup another instance of the jabber
> server to be
It's why I think we should
> have a full control of collaboration implementation instead of depending of
> a tier API.
>
Writing a low level API would not be hard. It's the high level stuff from
TogetherJS that will be lost.
Don't get this wrong, I'm not all for TogetherJ
vity: https://github.com/edudev/gtd-activity/tree/collaboration
togetherjs (This is not needed, it's just to show the changes I've made):
https://github.com/edudev/togetherjs/tree/sugar
Regards,
Emil Dudev
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Emil Dudev wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
d of the week I can show a web activity having
collaboration support based on TogetherJS.
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
e the speaker ones? I prefer having a separate
icon.
I've started work on a microphone icon that will fill itself depending on
the current volume setting.
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sug
Here are the keys that activites still use from GConf:
org.sugarlabs.speech pitch, rate
org.sugarlabs.user nick, color
org.sugarlabs backup-url
org.sugarlabs.collaboration jabber-server
org.sugarlabs.power automatic
org.sugarlabs.font default-face, default-size
The activities are numerous, so I did
for activities, which use custom keys.
These keys have to be included in sugar's schema file, or sugar should
allow activities to define their own schemas.
Emil Dudev
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 26 December 2013 17:30, Emil Dudev wrote:
>>
>> M
ion can be made
without affecting any of the activities.
Emil Dudev
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 26 December 2013 17:02, Emil Dudev wrote:
>>
>> As GConf is deprecated, it should be replaced by GSettings.
>>
>> I've made a patch that
sue is the
compatibility of the activities.
How should it be handled?
I'm not sure how many activities use GConf. I was able to find only 3:
read and write (using sugar's speech settings), and browse. But I'm
sure there are more activit
w the
selection of a light or dark theme.
There is also an option to select a custom theme, choosing custom
colors for background and foreground.
What are your thoughts on having a custom theme option?
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
ere was a discussion about this on a pull request and I
believe to have taken care of the issues noted there.
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
hich I add personally).
I've used gmail's web interface to send the mails, not an MTA/SMTP client.
Yet I find many mails from sugar-devel in my spam folder, as well.
Emil Dudev
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Same here. Maybe the infra team can help wit
this is an interesting feature that sugar must implement. Maybe
in the future the support can be extended to not only text and images.
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/81f4cd226f7e0930d10d944e22e2eeaf933a953b
Since I can't create icons, the refresh button uses the software update
icon of the control panel.
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/
aster...edudev:ticket3856
I currently display all the folders that *xdg-user-dir* handles. Half of
them can be removed.
And an other thing: the icons of all the folders is 'user-documents'.
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@list
t. Yet I have not
found way to fix it.
Here are the code edits:
https://github.com/edudev/sugar/compare/sugarlabs:master...edudev:ticket2473
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I think that's
where the problem is).
All calls to Gio.VolumeMonitor.get().get_mounts() return an empty list.
Also, no signals seem to be emitted from Gio.VolumeMonitor.get().
This is where I'm stuck.
Does anyone have a similar problem?
Regards,
Emil Dudev
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
31 matches
Mail list logo
