Hi Bernie,
Funny this should come up. When Sebastian and I were packaging up
sugar and deps for EPEL-6 I discovered this and scratched my head over
it but haven't had time to follow up. Looking through the various
sugar packages I see most of them use python-simplejson so if it could
be verified
El Tue, 24-08-2010 a las 10:10 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi Bernie,
Funny this should come up. When Sebastian and I were packaging up
sugar and deps for EPEL-6 I discovered this and scratched my head over
it but haven't had time to follow up. Looking through the various
sugar
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54:38AM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Tue, 24-08-2010 a las 10:10 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi Bernie,
Funny this should come up. When Sebastian and I were packaging up
sugar and deps for EPEL-6 I discovered this and scratched my head
over it but
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54:38AM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Tue, 24-08-2010 a las 10:10 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi Bernie,
Funny this should come up. When Sebastian and I were packaging up sugar
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:35:48PM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Please beware that sugar-toolkit, and activities Browse, Chat, Read
and Speak, also use cjson.
sugar-toolkit according to the requires in the spec file
Forwarding to the Sugar development list.
IIRC, we had switched to cjson only for a short time. Sugar 0.88 uses
simplejson.
So, maybe the dependencies of the rpm have not been adjusted
accordingly.
- Mensaje reenviado
De: Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu
Para:
6 matches
Mail list logo
