I agree :)
Right now, we are sitting back and seeing what roll OLPC-Australia is
going to play in the ecosystem. The One Education distribution out of
Australia is a combination of Dextrose, Sugar .100 and some custom
patches. My semi-informed guess is that Walter and Rangan (
https://www.laptop.o
Cool stuff.
As for Fedora it would be great to have builds with the latest sugar
(stable and unstable) releases. I'm not saying to ship those to deployments
of course, but they would help upstream development, marketing and
testing... And they would help AC to make the transition to the next sugar
Please see the link at the bottom left of http://dextrose.ac/platform/
for the Sugar on Ubuntu images which Activity Central and Plan Ceibal
are jointly developing.
For stability it is based on Ubuntu 12.04 and Sugar .98. The testing
is done on classmate to meet Plan Ceibal's specifications. I sho
Yeah, is a option.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 00:37, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>>
>> In F18 we can do:
>> from gi.repository import WebKit2
>>
>> but later crash, not sure where.
>>
>
> Hrm, yeah, I had forgot the exact situation in Fedo
On 7 November 2013 00:37, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> In F18 we can do:
> from gi.repository import WebKit2
>
> but later crash, not sure where.
>
Hrm, yeah, I had forgot the exact situation in Fedora 18...
Then I'm afraid the only solid approach I can think of is testing for a
SUGAR_WEBKIT_VER
In F18 we can do:
from gi.repository import WebKit2
but later crash, not sure where.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
>> >
>> > If we want to support WebKit1,
On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
> >
> > If we want to support WebKit1, I think we should do it upstream then. I'm
> > still not thrilled about that but not opposed to it either.
>
> Good. We can see what is the better way to do it.
/>On 06/11/2013 13:31, Daniel Narvaez wrote://
//>You mean people are using them in Uruguay deployments? Which distro?/
--
In Uruguay we have Classmates II (called "Magallanes") in some High Schools,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Clock, Speak, and part of Memorize use gstreamer just to do text to speech.
> I would like to have tts provided by Sugar as a service, probably using dbus
> and a api in sugar-toolkit-gtk3. That would simplify these activities and
> solve
>
Clock, Speak, and part of Memorize use gstreamer just to do text to speech.
I would like to have tts provided by Sugar as a service, probably using dbus
and a api in sugar-toolkit-gtk3. That would simplify these activities and solve
other problems we have, like by example the keep the language name
>> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
>
> If we want to support WebKit1, I think we should do it upstream then. I'm
> still not thrilled about that but not opposed to it either.
Good. We can see what is the better way to do it. May be check the
webkit version installed?
Just for referenc
Gstreamer 0.10 is part of what I'm calling gtk2 toolkit, it's not
completely accurate but we have been using than terminology. So it seems we
are going to run into the issue of gtk2 toolkit pieces disappearing earlier
then I expected.
I think you can move to gst 1.0 only if you already ported to g
On 6 November 2013 17:38, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> >
> > On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
> >> >
> >> > Please elaborate :)
> >> >
> >> > I thi
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I forgot a note about toolkits
>
> * The gtk2 toolkit is deprecated and frozen but it will be supported as long
> as possible (at some point I guess some dependencies might start
> disappearing from distributions, making that problematic). Th
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
> On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
>> >
>> > Please elaborate :)
>> >
>> > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms
>> > (WebKi
On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
> >
> > Please elaborate :)
> >
> > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms
> (WebKit1
> > and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain)
>>
>> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
>
> Please elaborate :)
>
> I think developing web activities on two very different platforms (WebKit1
> and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain) then doing
> some backporting.
Well, with a little patch in our
2013/11/6 Daniel Narvaez :
> On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've not tried it as I
>> > don't have HW but I don't see any reason they shouldn't work OOTB.
>>
>> Yep. Sugar is running in classmates out of the box. In Uruguay
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Are classmates somehow available to developers? It sounds like making images
> (or whatever) for them might be a pretty good idea.
You should be able to use the SoaS images on them straight up, there's
an installer option. If it's aimed at a
On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
> > Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've not tried it as I
> > don't have HW but I don't see any reason they shouldn't work OOTB.
>
> Yep. Sugar is running in classmates out of the box. In Uruguay for
> example.
>
You mean people ar
Are classmates somehow available to developers? It sounds like making
images (or whatever) for them might be a pretty good idea.
On 6 November 2013 16:25, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Yes, but we never provided a easy way to install in classmates,
> or tried to approach hardware manufactures to prop
On 6 November 2013 16:12, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > * Wait and see what happens with the XO. Support existing deployments by
> > producing images with the most recent Sugar release. Stick to a Fedora 18
> > base system, the work to upgrade is highly non trivial. Provide custom
> rpms
> > for the
Yes, but we never provided a easy way to install in classmates,
or tried to approach hardware manufactures to propose them to invest on that.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2013/11/6 Peter Robinson :
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>>
2013/11/6 Peter Robinson :
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think Sugar Labs needs to express a clear, realistic technology roadmap.
>>> For example, we have been talking a lot about Sugar on And
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think Sugar Labs needs to express a clear, realistic technology roadmap.
>> For example, we have been talking a lot about Sugar on Android, mixing a lot
>> of different
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think Sugar Labs needs to express a clear, realistic technology roadmap.
> For example, we have been talking a lot about Sugar on Android, mixing a lot
> of different things under that name. We need to clarify what that really i
26 matches
Mail list logo