Hello!
Please report bugs for the webkit2 version of browse! It is in
development, and lots of things are not right (lack of long-press to
open palette, the back button palette).
Note the the webkit2 version of browse specifically requires WebKit2
2.11.X or higher. Saddly, 2.12 has not
Ahh, my mistake, i thought it was gtk2 based, since flash is working there.
I understood that flash didn't work because, flash plugin is developed
on GTK2 and Browse webkit based is developed on GTK3 ?
So i wonder why Flash plugin works with Webkit2 and not with Webkit ?
Regards.
PS: Off
Webkit2 is not a gtk2 version, is a version using webkit2 instead of webkit.
The port is advanced, but not ready. If you plan use it, please help to
test all the functionalities,
and finish the port. Who is working on that is Sam Parkinson.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Gustavo
Hi all,
We installed GTK2 version
(https://github.com/sugarlabs/browse-activity/tree/webkit2), flash works
very well, we are testing and until now, all is going fine.
Thanks.
On 3/1/16 7:35 PM, James Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:26:53PM -0300, Gustavo Duarte wrote:
If I'm
Thanks Guys!! for your comments.
If I'm understanding you well, the only way I have at this time, is try
with Browse GTK2 version ?
I'm right ?
Thanks.
On 03/01/2016 06:48 PM, James Cameron wrote:
Yes, only in WebKit2.
Original poster is asking about current Browse.
On Tue, Mar 01,
Yes, only in WebKit2.
Original poster is asking about current Browse.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:39:57PM +, Sam P. wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> WebKitGtk+ actually has work arounds to allows for GTK2 plugins to run in the
> Gtk3 webkit. See the webkitgtk front page:
>
> Since adding support
Adobe's plugin links against GTK2, but Browse is GTK3.
GTK2 and GTK3 cannot be mixed in the same process; the symbols are not
versioned.
So the problem is that Browse is "too new", and the Adobe plugin has
not kept pace with the GTK2 to GTK3 move.
You should approach Adobe for a custom build to
Quoting Sebastian Silva (2016-03-01 17:21:07)
> On 01/03/16 10:16, Gustavo Duarte wrote:
>> If mostly Browser are supporting Flash, like Firefox, Chrome and
>> Epiphany, why Browse Activity, not ?
>> Browse is based on Webkit (Chrome and Safari also) and Webkit support
>> Flash.
Google-based
I see your point regarding Flash on non-XO.
On 01/03/16 10:16, Gustavo Duarte wrote:
> If mostly Browser are supporting Flash, like Firefox, Chrome and
> Epiphany, why Browse Activity, not ?
>
> Browse is based on Webkit (Chrome and Safari also) and Webkit support
> Flash.
This is really not
Gustavo,
It's been four years already that Adobe dropped support for Linux [1].
Yes there are workarounds on "life support". Some distros, even google,
maintain some kind of solution. Maybe even OLPC can help you. But
really, I invite you to think this thru.
I have seen many times XO deployers
Hi,
Mmmm on Linux Firefox, Chrome and Epiphany has support for flash, i
tested and working well.
And Ubuntu, has a package flashplugin-installer.
I guess, Browse activity, isn't detecting this plugin.
Thoughts ?
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Sebastian Silva
Hi all,
I wonder if Browse Activity (v 157.2), running on Sugar 0.107 on Ubuntu
14.04 supports Flash ?
How is the procedure to configure or enable Flash on it ?
Thanks in advance.
Gustavo Duarte.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
