nst.
- Bert -
> - Original Message -
> From: Peter Robinson
> To: Development of live Sugar distributions
> Cc: sugar-devel
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Strawberry - login screen
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bert Fre
: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Strawberry - login screen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bert Freudenberg
wrote:
On 13.06.2011, at 06:50, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Esteban Arias
wrote:
hi!
do you know why sugar on stick - SoaS
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 13.06.2011, at 06:50, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Esteban Arias
> wrote:
>
>> hi!
>>
>> do you know why sugar on stick - SoaS release 1 (Strawberry), shows login
>> when I change configuration from
On 15.05.2011, at 20:39, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> * presence-service fails. The buddy-icon.jpg used to be created in
> jarabe/intro/window.py but that code was removed:
>
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/commit/c38e03f641e2f409464340bf67826809cf2f94dc
> maybe a quick fix would be to
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 15.05.2011, at 19:25, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 15.05.2011, at 18:39, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
Here is the Etoys 116 sugar-log output for soas rc3 installed to VirtualBox
4.0.4 OSX:
Tom Gilliard
satellit on #sugar freeno
On 15.05.2011, at 19:25, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> On 15.05.2011, at 18:39, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
>>> Here is the Etoys 116 sugar-log output for soas rc3 installed to VirtualBox
>>> 4.0.4 OSX:
>>>
>>> Tom Gilliard
>>> satellit on #sugar freenode IRC
>>>
>>>
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 15.05.2011, at 18:39, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
Here is the Etoys 116 sugar-log output for soas rc3 installed to VirtualBox
4.0.4 OSX:
Tom Gilliard
satellit on #sugar freenode IRC
How do I liveinst from the SoaS iso?
Booted CD (or .iso in VirtualBox):
On 15.05.2011, at 18:39, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> Here is the Etoys 116 sugar-log output for soas rc3 installed to VirtualBox
> 4.0.4 OSX:
>
> Tom Gilliard
> satellit on #sugar freenode IRC
How do I liveinst from the SoaS iso?
> === SqueakDebug.log START ==
> DBusError: Proc
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
>
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems in certain circumstances the second menus do work on Fedora
> 15 (thanks Thomas for testing). I suspect there was a new dep added to
> sugar for this feature that we're not actually depen
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
It seems in certain circumstances the second menus do work on Fedora
15 (thanks Thomas for testing). I suspect there was a new dep added to
sugar for this feature that we're not actually depending on and its
hence only getting installed in certain situations. Can
> Hi All,
>
> It seems in certain circumstances the second menus do work on Fedora
> 15 (thanks Thomas for testing). I suspect there was a new dep added to
> sugar for this feature that we're not actually depending on and its
> hence only getting installed in certain situati
On 5/7/11 8:30 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
It seems in certain circumstances the second menus do work on Fedora
15 (thanks
Preliminary testing:
Acer and MacBook + activities
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Fedora-SoaS#SoaSv5-20110415-i686
Looks Good : )
Tom Gilliard
satellit
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Peter
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hello Fans!
>>
>> So we've had a lot of movement and fixes submitted this week!
>> Actually. I've fixed a few things in the last day or so.
>>
>> So what's happened recently (ie:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hello Fans!
>
> So we've had a lot of movement and fixes submitted this week!
> Actually. I've fixed a few things in the last day or so.
>
> So what's happened recently (ie: what's in the snapshot below:
> - Latest 0.92.1 release
> - I t
Hello Fans!
So we've had a lot of movement and fixes submitted this week!
Actually. I've fixed a few things in the last day or so.
So what's happened recently (ie: what's in the snapshot below:
- Latest 0.92.1 release
- I think the horrible "massive amounts of prompts" aka as the
"gnome-keyri
wing window
The next time you boot, there are no logins at all.
Art Hunkins
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Robinson"
To: "Sugar on a Stick List" ; "Sugar devel"
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:13 AM
Subject: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v5 status
Hi All,
Sor
Thomas,
> 1. Multiple pop-ups of keychain on starting sugar-emulator
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690586
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649013
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2652
Thanks for reminding me of that one. I believe we have a fix, I'll dig it out
Rafael Ortiz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@bendbroadband.com> wrote:
Peter:
These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed to
f15:
yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator
http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@bendbroadband.com> wrote:
>
> Peter:
>
> These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed to
> f15:
> yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator
>
>
> http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stag
Peter:
These are the major problems I see with sugar-desktop 0.92.0 installed
to f15:
yum install@sugar-desktop --skip-broken sugar-emulator
http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/Live/i686/Fedora-15-Beta-i686-Live-Desktop.iso
1. Multiple pop-ups of keychain on star
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
>> travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
>> to completely since FUDCon at
Damn, I was watching IRC for it and it seems I was having some
connectivity issues. GRR!
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> Peter:
> Marketing Meeting just ended:
> Take a look
> Tom Gilliard
> satellit
>
> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings
Peter:
Marketing Meeting just ended:
Take a look
Tom Gilliard
satellit
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-04-05T14:05:39
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-04-05T14:05:39.html
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wr
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
>
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
> travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
to completely since FUDCon at the end of January :-(
That said I've sp
Gonzalo,
I'll try to have a look this evening but it might be quicker and
easier to grab the latest SoaS 5 live image and have a poke yourself.
Peter
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Peter,
> The bindings in F14 were broken an i fixed them.
> If you can send me logs, i ca
Peter,
The bindings in F14 were broken an i fixed them.
If you can send me logs, i can try to see what is the problem.
Gonzalo
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > Read (issues with gnome-python2-evince API changes/br
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Read (issues with gnome-python2-evince API changes/breakage)
>
> What version are you using?
> Can you copy log error or any information?
The problem I believe is changes in API in the latest evince release
which will be 3.0.0 or what ever i
Read (issues with gnome-python2-evince API changes/breakage)
What version are you using?
Can you copy log error or any information?
Gonzalo
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
> travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
> to completely since FUDCon at the end of January :-(
>
> That said I've spent some time over
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
> travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
> to completely since FUDCon at the end of January :-(
>
> That said I've spent some time ove
Hi All,
Sorry for a lot of the recent radio silence. In short I've been
travelling a lot and work and my personal life took over pretty close
to completely since FUDCon at the end of January :-(
That said I've spent some time over the last couple of days to fix up
and update some SoaS bits and a
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> Note:
>
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
> points to
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/2011-03-27-nightly-spins.html
> which points to
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf
James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit#f15_gnome3_with_sugar0.92.0
No such anchor in the page. The correct link is currently:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit#f15_gnome3_
Peter;
This is strange the USB created by dd command seems to be the only way I
have gotten a good install. It boots fine as gnome3 x86-64 in ACER
ASPIRE ONE and as gnome2 version (fallback) in EeePC100HE? 32 bit .iso
USB works for both.
VirtualBox4.0.4 starts as fallback as expected.
I am
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the update. Its good to know. I spent quite a bit of time
at FUDCon getting it to a working state. Have you by chance tested any
of the post alpha SoaS nightly builds?
Peter
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Cre
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit#f15_gnome3_with_sugar0.92.0
No such anchor in the page. The correct link is currently:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit#f15_gnome3_with_sugar_0.92.0
Also, in this
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@bendbroadband.com> wrote:
> Testing done successfully on IRC tonight:
>
> I translated 2 wiki entries to spanish this way.(1)
>
> seems to work well
>
> /join #sugar
> /join #sugar-es
> use meeting function to do the text translation:
>
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
I added this to the Soas_v-5 list:
Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks
proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks.html
Wha
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> I added this to the Soas_v-5 list:
>
> Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks
>
> proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks.html
What was the reason this wasn
I added this to the Soas_v-5 list:
Implement feature: Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks
proposed and approved for v-4 SoaS
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Revised_Browse_default-bookmarks.html
>We need to discuss on list what would included on the wiki page linked
from the sugar-browse st
Hi All,
Will the (hopefully short term) withdrawal of Sebastian from SoaS I'm
sending out the feature process email for V5. With the reduction in
the team I'm not going to have the weekly feature process meetings but
think that a on list discussion might be the best way to proceed for
this release
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
>
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I just thought I would give people a heads up for changes that I'm
>> aware of that are going to be appearing in Fedora 15 / SoaS 5.
>>
>> The big one will be gnome3/gtk3 plus the associated
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I just thought I would give people a heads up for changes that I'm
aware of that are going to be appearing in Fedora 15 / SoaS 5.
The big one will be gnome3/gtk3 plus the associated changes that will
come with the required pygtk / gobject-introspection (Tomeu cou
Sebastian,
Firstly a massive THANK YOU! I think Sugar as a whole is better off
for Sugar on a Stick and your work from my perspective at least is
greatly appreciated!
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> The Short Version: As many of you might have noticed, my activities
Done. (Thanks for the help, Sascha!)
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/IRC/
-Fran
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Any chance of a tar file uploaded to?
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/IRC/
>
> Peter
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Fran Roger
Leeming
> Cc: Sugar devel
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS questions
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, David Leeming
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I have questions about the latest release of SOAS. Are these observations
>> unusual or do others se
-Original Message-
From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
[mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2010 8:32 p.m.
To: David Leeming
Cc: Sugar devel
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS questions
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:27
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, David Leeming
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have questions about the latest release of SOAS. Are these observations
> unusual or do others see these issues?
>
>
>
> (a) eToys does not start up properly. On start up a garbled view of the
> animated car is displayed,
Hello,
I have questions about the latest release of SOAS. Are these observations
unusual or do others see these issues?
(a)eToys does not start up properly. On start up a garbled view of the
animated car is displayed, and then it won't shut down. I also experienced
this with Mirabelle
Any chance of a tar file uploaded to?
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/IRC/
Peter
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Fran Rogers wrote:
> Should be fixed in a new release I pushed out today (version 8).
> -Fran
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov
Should be fixed in a new release I pushed out today (version 8).
-Fran
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:07:00PM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> > IRC -7 works well as it starts in #sugar. I can talk/receive
> > then I do a /join #sugar-meeting
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:07:00PM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> IRC -7 works well as it starts in #sugar. I can talk/receive
> then I do a /join #sugar-meeting. and it talks
> I then shut down the activity.
> I then resume the activity.
> The 2 tabs show but i get a "*/no one to talk to" messa
al Message -
From: "David Leeming"
To: "'Thomas C Gilliard'" ; "'Development of
live Sugar distributions'"
Cc: "'Sugar Labs Marketing'" ; "'Sugar
devel'"
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [S
-
From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
[mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Thomas C
Gilliard
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2010 5:14 p.m.
To: Development of live Sugar distributions
Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing; Sugar devel
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 4
Great News;
Fedora-14-x86_64-Live-SoaS CD Boots fine on an Apple MacBook Air with an
external hp-DVD/CD usb drive.
Hold "C" and tap power button keep holding the "C" key down until the
blue fedora boot screen appears
Select Boot (Basic Video)-second line
boots to bar display Fedora 14; (Nam
Thanks, submitted a ticket to get that fixed.
Peter
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> The "About" page still says third edition mirabelle
>
> Tom Gilliard
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is the non announcement announcement of the release of Sugar o
The "About" page still says third edition mirabelle
Tom Gilliard
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
This is the non announcement announcement of the release of Sugar on a
Stick 4 Mango Lassi is out.
You can download both the 32 and 64 bit version from
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
Ther
Hi All,
This is the non announcement announcement of the release of Sugar on a
Stick 4 Mango Lassi is out.
You can download both the 32 and 64 bit version from
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/
There's an outline of some common bugs in Fedora 14 and hence Fedora
14 outlined here
https://fedor
Matt,
Would be nice if you sent these queries directly to the mailing list
for all to see.
> Matt Wronkiewicz wrote:
>
> What if, instead of concentrating on the nightly builds, we went after
> the updates to Fedora 15 as they came in? From reading through the
> past messages to the list, it seem
Matt Wronkiewicz wrote:
What if, instead of concentrating on the nightly builds, we went after
the updates to Fedora 15 as they came in? From reading through the
past messages to the list, it seems like once someone else breaks
something in Fedora core for us, we have a hard time fixing it. Two
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
Peter;
I do not have an intel Mac so I cannot try this new boot CD. Has any one
tested it?
You don't need a Mac to test it. You shouldn't need it for a Mac (you
just need to use the 64 bit version of it
Matt;
You are correct that Soas-v4-Mango lassi is closed.
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.RC1/Live/Fedora-14-i686-Live-SoaS/Fedora-14-i686-Live-SoaS.iso
Seems to be destined to be destined to be the final version that will be
released on nov 3.
I assume that the nightly comp
In testing Soas in Nightly Composes I keep running into a problem with
making the CD as a live CD and including features only needed for a
liveinst install with Anaconda:
*1_) Running as booted LiveCD:*
Pop up for keychain password is unnecessary :
Current behavior of booting live CD (This oc
FYI:
Significant bugs exist on the Soas Nightly compose:
soas-i386-20101002.18.iso
f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick 4 0.89.6 (Mango Lassi)
1-) CD boots to Name__ pops up "enter keychain password" 7+times
(this does not work-have to hit cancel 7 times) then it lets soas run
[http://bugs.su
On 09/22/2010 08:07 PM, David Farning wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
>> opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
>> Fedora QA team and process to discus
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:07, David Farning wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
>> opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
>> Fedora QA team and process t
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
> opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
> Fedora QA team and process to discuss how we could incorporate Sugar
> and SoaS testing
/ticket/2355#comment:2]
Thomas Gilliard
satellit
Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
CD Boot test
soas-i386-20100921.15.iso
f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi)
1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__
2-) pops up enter keychain password 6+times (does not work) then it lets
soas ru
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> CD Boot test
>
> soas-i386-20100921.15.iso
>
> f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi)
>
> 1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__
>
> 2-) pops up enter keychain password 6+times (does not work) then it lets
> soas run [http://bugs
CD Boot test
soas-i386-20100921.15.iso
f14(Laughlin) Sugar on a stick (Mango Lassi)
1-)grey boot screen, boots to Name__
2-) pops up enter keychain password 6+times (does not work) then it lets
soas run [http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2339]
wireless AP show starts logged in to Ad_Hoc Ne
Correction:
After reboot
bug 3 seems to have been fixed.
It took several minutes to recover jabber connection first time logged
out/in
Note: Sugar-emulator works best if copy education/sugar start item to
desktop. right click properties, and edit command: "sugar-emulator -f"
(add the -f) for fu
Install report:
Netinstall CD with 14.17.4 Anaconda to extenal 250Gb USB HD
Repos:
f14 Beta
f14-Beta Updates testing
Fedora-14-Beta-RC3-i386-netinst with Sugar-desktop (all items checked)
in "Customize now"
boots HD,firstboot, boots to login
Gnome & Sugar on gdm switcher on login
Sugar:
Bugs Se
On 09/21/2010 03:49 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbe
> wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>>
Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
process (documented on the Development
On 09/20/2010 11:10 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
>>> process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
>>> wiki) or others as well?
On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
>>> process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
>>> wiki) or others as
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
> > Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
> > process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
> > wiki) or others as well?
>
> Ideally all of them, as (a) there are not
On 09/15/2010 04:27 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I
>>> won't spend my time packaging it.
>>
>> Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010:
> > Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I
> > won't spend my time packaging it.
>
> Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be easily
> generated with the tools in sugar is n
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:38:34PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from David Farning's message of Wed Sep 15 14:28:05 +0200 2010:
>> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a
>> tarball.
For the entire 'why' I will have to refer you to the the Debain
mailing lists.
Excerpts from David Farning's message of Wed Sep 15 14:28:05 +0200 2010:
> >> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball.
> For the entire 'why' I will have to refer you to the the Debain
> mailing lists. /me ducks The short answer is Debian packaging is
> premised
On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
>> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200
>>> 2010:
>>>
>> In the .deb side of the univer
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200
2010:
>> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can
>> work directly from the git rep
On 09/15/2010 11:47 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
>
In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
directly from the git repository.
>>
>> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
>
>> >> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
>> >> directly from the git repository.
>>
>> We should not go from the git repository. Ei
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:57AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity release
Hi Peter,
thanks for your feedback.
On 09/14/2010 11:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
>> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs
On 09/14/2010 11:15 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity re
On 09/15/2010 10:41 AM, David Farning wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
On 09/15/2010 01:58 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> Thanks David and Walter for the feedback,
>>
>> On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon
Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Wed Sep 15 01:58:07 +0200 2010:
[activity release tarballs]
> I've been uploading me since Bernie kindly un blocked my shell account,
> though I totally understand why others might not manage this workflow,
> there's already many hoops to jump though for a
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
> >> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
> >> directly from the git repository.
>
> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball.
Why? And who is "we" in this
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them
>>> in distributi
On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Thanks David and Walter for the feedback,
>
> On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did
you switch over to construct the
On 15.09.2010, at 00:07, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg
> wrote:
>
>> And (from your other msg) why do you want both zip (xo) and tar balls?
>
> I just want sure source code only tarfiles. I presume for a.sl.o
> there's a need for ready to run
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarball
301 - 400 of 986 matches
Mail list logo
