On 05/25/2009 11:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> Tomeu was quicker in his response than me...
>
> As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in
> regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the
> Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora
>
[...]
>>> That's why people are barking at the wrong tree when they say that
>>> Sugar developers should port Sugar to whatever system. The skills
>>> involved are very different from upstream work and if coders are not
>>> coding we won't have anything new to ship.
>>>
>> If barking ever applies m
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 16:25, Marten Vijn wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> [adding sugar-devel again to CC]
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, N
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> [adding sugar-devel again to CC]
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC wrote:
> >>
> >> Just copying files is unlikely
Tomeu was quicker in his response than me...
As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in
regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the
Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora
distribution running on the hardware. Sugar would be pa
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>>
>> I hope this anwers your question,
>> Simon
>>
>>
>
> Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able
> to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so
> it is a working Linux distribution. If
>
> I hope this anwers your question,
>Simon
>
>
Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able
to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so
it is a working Linux distribution. If somehow I copy the latest Sugar
over the old Sugar (0.82
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:51:22PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote:
> > I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap.
> > This is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read
> > Etexts, and is being included
NoiseEHC wrote:
> Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
> OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Do you mean the XO-1 or XO-1.5, specifically? Also, I hope you are aware of
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2009/05/16/the-olpc-xo-1-5-and-fedora-11
which states
On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote:
> I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap. This
> is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read Etexts, and
> is being included in SoaS now. I'm looking forward to having a version of
> Sugar I can in
On 05/22/2009 07:06 PM, David Farning wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHC wrote:
>> Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
>> OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
>
> Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions.
>
> The challenge in this in
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHC wrote:
> Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
> OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions.
The challenge in this instance is on the shoulders of the hardware
vendor to pu
Hi Noise.
There is and there will be (i presume), a collaboration between the two
teams (OLPC and Sugarlabs), to port sugar to the XO 1.5.
but details on how this will be done are still missing.
Rafael Ortiz
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:43 AM, NoiseEHC wrote:
> Are there any plans to port S
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Attendees: Tomeu, Aleksey, Walter, Sayamindu, Simon
>
> Retrospect: We have been brainstorming on the Goals of the 0.86 release.
> The Output can be seen at
ncluded.
James Simmons
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:49:01 +0200
From: Simon Schampijer
Subject: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES (Thursday May 21 2009 -
14.00 (UTC))
To: Sugar Devel
Message-ID: <4a169f3d.3020...@schampijer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flo
Attendees: Tomeu, Aleksey, Walter, Sayamindu, Simon
Retrospect: We have been brainstorming on the Goals of the 0.86 release.
The Output can be seen at
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.86 Feel
free to add items you feel important to the roadmap - have in mind that
Hi,
a) Schedule: adjust feature freeze
We did discuss the need to adjust the freeze, and announced that will,
it will be officially announced if nobody brings up reasons why this
would not work out nicely.
b) create a short term TODO list of items (i.e. collaboration rock) and
find owners and
17 matches
Mail list logo
