The error message "Could not connect to TraCI server" only comes after the
second failed connection attempt. It would guess that traci.connect (or
traci.start) is called repeatedly with argument numRetries=1.
Am Do., 11. Apr. 2019 um 04:34 Uhr schrieb <21_l...@tongji.edu.cn>:
> Hi, Jakob,
>
> Th
see
https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Simulation/VehicleInsertion#Forcing_Insertion_.2F_Avoiding_depart_delay
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 21:13 Uhr schrieb Do Duc Le :
> Hello,
>
> I control the speed of my vehicles via Traci with vehicle.setSpeed(),
> which I'm reading from a file. After I ran the simulati
Hi, Jakob,
Thanks for your reply. Now what is confusing me is the sudden abort of sumo as
shown in the attachment. The program written in python runs SUMO in Ubuntu.
After running about 600 simulations, the program has stopped suddenly. There
are no warnings or bugs shown, just "Retrying in 1
Hello,
I control the speed of my vehicles via Traci with vehicle.setSpeed(),
which I'm reading from a file. After I ran the simulation I noticed that
the vehicles didn't behave as expected. The depart times of the vehicles
(which were specified in the route-file) changed. Some vehicles entered
If you did not modify the phase duration from its default, then:
previousSwitch = traci.trafficlight.getNextSwitch(tlsiD) -
traci.trafficlight.getPhaseDuration(tlsID)
See https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/TraCI/Traffic_Lights_Value_Retrieval
regards,
Jakob
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 18:55 Uhr schrieb Kamble
Hi,
Can I get the amount of time elapsed since a particular phase of tls
program started? TraCI allows to get the time at which the next switch is
going to happen but not previous one. How can I get that?
Thanks in advance.
___
sumo-user mailing list
It should work if there is at least one lane which forbids pedestrians for
each of the edges being crossed so I suspect your permissions must be
adapted somewhere.
If that's not the case, send me the network so I can take a look.
regards,
Jakob
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Ákos Kész
Hello!
I would like to create seperated pedestrian crossings on a junction, as
shown on the image below.
[image: image.png]
The problem is that when i try to create one, i get the following error
message: "Warning: Discarding invalid crossing ':gneJ99_c3' at junction
'gneJ99' with edges 'gneE76 gn
Hello,
- you can cheat with raster screenshots by enlarging the gui window beyond
the screen size. You'll have to do this with the mouse though (
https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/5456)
- vector screenshots are somewhat better on linux than on windows (custom
shapes included, no triangle glitc
No, setting flow to <= 0 is currently the only way.
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 11:10 Uhr schrieb Kevin Malena <
kevin.mal...@uni-paderborn.de>:
> Hey SUMO-users,
>
>
>
> is there an option to set calibrators ‘active’ if not specified? ‘Active’
> means here that they should permit any vehicle to dri
Hey SUMO-users,
is there an option to set calibrators 'active' if not specified? 'Active' means
here that they should permit any vehicle to drive through.
I know that I can specify the vehicles per hour to zero in all of this cases,
but I wanna know if there might be an easier and more handy way
Hi all,
I want to produce some high-quality / high-resolution figures of my SUMO
network. Is there some good solution, given that normal screenshots are
bound to the screen resolution? Can the vector image export of SUMO be
tuned to avoid some glitches like the following:
* roads cut off:
This is a misunderstanding. The transformation is maintained because the
network records the applied offset and uses it when converting between x,y
and lon,lat. (when writing fcd output and when using traci or sumolib to
convert coordinates).
You do not need to change a config file.
the below call
Ok, thanks. So it‘s important that I retain the x,y coordinates because of the
transformation to lat/lon. Which of those options should I use then? And do I
have to set it in my config file?
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 um 09:39 Uhr
> Von: "Jakob Erdmann"
> An: "Sumo project User discu
Then you may get flickering in the GUI due to numerical (rounding) errors.
There should even be a warning to this effect when building the network
with netconvert. The recommended solution is to shift the network
coordinates so that the lower left corner is at 0,0.
Netconvert does this by default u
Yes, it is using large x,y coordinates .
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 um 09:20 Uhr
> Von: "Jakob Erdmann"
> An: "Sumo project User discussions"
> Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Vehicles in Simulation are moving "shaky"
>
> Is your network using very large x,y coordinates?
>
> Am Mi., 10. Apr.
Is your network using very large x,y coordinates?
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 09:07 Uhr schrieb :
> Good Morning everyone,
>
> I have a question about the simulation directly. It's working totally fine
> and as expected, but my vehicles are moving, like "shaky/tremulous", not
> smoothly following th
Good Morning everyone,
I have a question about the simulation directly. It's working totally fine and as expected, but my vehicles are moving, like "shaky/tremulous", not smoothly following the lane.
I have implemented the sublane model with 4 sublanes. But not using it doesn't solve the probl
18 matches
Mail list logo
