e-mail test

2016-01-06 Thread steve-irick
e-mail test --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

test

2015-07-25 Thread Gian Casalegno
This mail is for testing only. Thanks. Gian Casalegno --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

sorry, this is a test

2014-06-06 Thread Simon [illustratingshadows
none of my emails have made it to this list, this is a test, sorry Simon Simon Wheaton-Smith www.illustratingshadows.com Phoenix, Arizona, W112.1 N33.5--- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test: ignore

2011-07-30 Thread Tom Egan
--- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test Message--Ignore

2010-06-03 Thread Brad Lufkin
--- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test Message-Ignore

2009-11-09 Thread Brad Lufkin
--- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Beta test of Shadows 3.1

2009-06-20 Thread perso
Dear all I am preparing a new version 3.1 of my program Shadows. Before releasing it as a final version, I’d like to proof-test it with some advanced users… ;-) This new version will bring the following features : · Universal astrolabes (that you can use and rotate on screen

Test

2008-10-06 Thread Tom Egan
Attempt to use hotmail to escape blocking of sundial bounces _ Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live. http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?oc

Sorry, another test. I can't get a message from "uni-koeln.de" past AT&T's filter

2008-10-05 Thread Tom Egan
Sent from gmail --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Yet another test. Please ignore

2008-10-05 Thread Tom Egan
-- Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less. Marie Curie (1867 - 1934) --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test -- Ignore

2008-10-02 Thread Tom Egan
In case you're wondering why I'm sending so many test messages, I'm having a hard time getting my ISP to stop blocking mail from the sundial mailing list. -- Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it

Test ... Ignore

2008-09-25 Thread Tom Egan
-- Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx 1895 - 1977 --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundi

Test #3 -- Ignore

2008-09-16 Thread Tom Egan
Test message #3. Please ignore. -- Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate. --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test #2 -- Ignore

2008-09-16 Thread Tom Egan
Test message #2. Please ignore. -- Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate. --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test -- Ignore

2008-09-16 Thread Tom Egan
Test message. Please ignore. -- Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate. --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

test

2006-09-16 Thread Andrew Pettit
Andrew --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test

2006-09-16 Thread Andrew Pettit
Andrew --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Test-Please Ignore

2006-04-11 Thread edleym
Testing --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

test

2006-03-08 Thread Colin Davis
Test test. Thanks Gentlemen Colin Davis --- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Re: Just a test

2006-01-18 Thread Dave Bell
Looks liek yuo did... Dave On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, jean-paul cornec wrote: > Hi all > > ...to check if I have clicked the right buttons. > > Jean-Paul Cornec --

Just a test

2006-01-18 Thread jean-paul cornec
Hi all   ...to check if I have clicked the right buttons.   Jean-Paul Cornec --

Test

2005-11-12 Thread Edley McKnight
Test Edley -

test

2005-11-12 Thread fer de vries
Test.   Fer J. de Vries   De Zonnewijzerkringmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.de-zonnewijzerkring.nl   Eindhoven, Netherlandslat.  51:30 N  long.  5:30 E

test email

2005-11-06 Thread John Carmichael
this is a test.    Note to Dave Bell:  Dave, if this test email gets posted would you please let me know?   John

Test

2005-10-11 Thread Mac Oglesby
Please ignore this test message. -

Test Message please ignore

2005-09-18 Thread tony moss
Test message. Tony Moss -

test message 3

2005-09-17 Thread John Carmichael
Hopefully this is last test message.  I still can't get email from The Sundial List. I added sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de to my Norton's Allowed List and want to see what happens.  If this doesn't work I will contact Daniel Roth to see if I'm on his send list.   Please excuse,   John

test message 2

2005-09-16 Thread John Carmichael
For some reason I can send messages to The Sundial List, but I can't receive them.  I never received the test message that I sent this morning. Please excuse and just delete my test messages until I figure out a solution to the problem...   John

Test message

2005-09-16 Thread John Carmichael
This is a test message to The Sundial List.  Please disregard.

Test message please ignore.

2004-11-14 Thread tony moss
Test Tony Moss -

test

2004-08-29 Thread Larry Bohlayer
Test to sundial list… previous two messages sent to this list did not appear on the list between Aug. 20 and Aug. 26, 2004.   Larry Bohlayer 39.0 N 77.7 W

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-04-01 Thread Mac Oglesby
One wonders what the artist who painted this clock face had in mind! Mac Oglesby Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Roman4.jpg (JPEG/BOBO) (000C0846)

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-30 Thread Sundials
Further to Andrew James message on Roman Striking on Clocks, the saving on the number of striking blows is much greater than perhaps some non-clockies might appreciate, as Andrew just drew attention to the two blows saved at 4 o'clock. At 12 only 4 strokes are needed instead of 12, 3 at 11, 2 at 1

RE: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-29 Thread Andrew James
Message text written by Frank King > my guess is that the ratio would not be much different for clock faces.< Message text written by Patrick Powers > I have no data on this but because of the bias mentioned before (regarding the apparent better balance of a clock face when using ) I woul

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-28 Thread Patrick Powers
Message text written by Frank King > my guess is that the ratio would not be much different for clock faces.< Hmmm, I have no data on this but because of the bias mentioned before (regarding the apparent better balance of a clock face when using ) I would suspect that the prevalance of II

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-28 Thread Frank King
Message text written by Patrick Powers > ...out of 446 dials which show 4am or 4pm and where I have now > entered this sort of detail, 273 use and 173 use IV. This is wonderfully quantitative information and my guess is that the ratio would not be much different for clock faces. > ... usa

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-28 Thread tony moss
Patrick wrote: >The Romans used both at different times during their Empire with >rather more frequently overall. Many Thanks Patrick, it's good to have your authoritative access to that level of information on this. >I have been recording the usage of Roman numerals for 4am/4pm in the

Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-27 Thread Patrick Powers
Message text written by tony moss >I recall being 'smacked' by a BSS lady member for using a 'clock makers' IV' in my early attempt at Roman numerals some years ago.< The Romans used both at different times during their Empire with rather more frequently overall. There is no right or wron

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-27 Thread Richard Langley
According to , the Romans themselves rarely used the subtraction principle and so would have primarily used rather than IV. -- Richard On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, tony moss wrote: >Richard Langley wrote: > >>Isn't the clockmake

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-27 Thread tony moss
Richard Langley wrote: >Isn't the clockmaker's IV? Apparently introduced since it "balances" >VIII although that's not a theory that is without problems since other >numbers on the clock face are not balanced. While not necessarily >authoratative, see >

Re: Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-27 Thread Richard Langley
Tony: Isn't the clockmaker's IV? Apparently introduced since it "balances" VIII although that's not a theory that is without problems since other numbers on the clock face are not balanced. While not necessarily authoratative, see . --

Roman Numerals - as a test message

2004-03-27 Thread tony moss
Fellow Shadow Watchers, I've just noticed that the BBC TV News credit titles include the date as MMIV. Should this be MM? I recall being 'smacked' by a BSS lady member for using a 'clock makers' IV' in my early attempt at Roman numerals some ye

Test Only

2004-03-25 Thread Larry McDavid
-

[Fwd: Test Message Only]

2004-03-21 Thread Peter Mayer
Original Message Subject:Test Message Only Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:39:14 +1030 From: Peter Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Just testing to see if my message is posted successfully.

RE: Test Message

2003-10-27 Thread Anne Bruvold
, October 25, 2003 8:25 PMTo: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.deSubject: Test Message Since 20 Oct 03 I have not received any communication from the list.  This is a test to see if anyone out the gets this message, to see if problem is on my side.  Thanks   Les Lombard   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Message

2003-10-26 Thread Phil Walker
6:25 PM Subject: Test Message Since 20 Oct 03 I have not received any communication from the list.  This is a test to see if anyone out the gets this message, to see if problem is on my side.  Thanks   Les Lombard   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Message & Sun Spots

2003-10-25 Thread Brooke Clarke
ceived any communication from the list.  This is a test to see if anyone out the gets this message, to see if problem is on my side.  Thanks   Les Lombard   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Message

2003-10-25 Thread Brian Albinson
Les Came to Vancouver, Canada ok Brian Les Lombard wrote: Since 20 Oct 03 I have not received any communication from the list.  This is a test to see if anyone out the gets this message, to see if problem is on my side.  Thanks   Les Lombard   [EMAIL

Test Message

2003-10-25 Thread Les Lombard
Since 20 Oct 03 I have not received any communication from the list.  This is a test to see if anyone out the gets this message, to see if problem is on my side.  Thanks   Les Lombard   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test again - please ignore.

2003-10-14 Thread RKriegler
Thema: Test again - please ignore. Datum: 14.10.2003 23:01:24 Westeuropäische Normalzeit Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beantworten: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de An: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Internet-eMail: Still not receiving some messages - general as well as SML. Tony M. - Hello Tony, last

Test again - please ignore.

2003-10-14 Thread tony moss
Still not receiving some messages - general as well as SML. Tony M. -

Test please ignore

2003-10-14 Thread tony moss
Test please ignore. I seem to be missing out on a number of submissions to the SML. I see replies but not some of the original messages Tony Moss -

Test

2003-07-14 Thread J.Tallman
A particularly fierce computer glitch knocked my systems out of action for the weekend, and all weekend messages were lost. Please bear with me as I get back up and running. Any personal messages from list members since mid-day Friday, please resend. Thank you all for your patience, Jim T

Re: test

2003-02-24 Thread Nagy Sandor
IdČzet [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > test > - > Thank you' -

test

2003-02-20 Thread Clarkkr
test -

Test

2003-01-27 Thread Colin Davis
Hi! to All, Testing the site Cheers Colin -

Re: Test

2003-01-26 Thread DMBsundial
OK here. David Brown -

Blank Test Message 2

2002-10-29 Thread Tony Moss
Test 2 -

Blank Test Message

2002-10-29 Thread Tony Moss
TEST -

Test

2002-10-16 Thread colin davis
Test after a major Crash !!! Colin Davis -

Test

2002-10-07 Thread John Carmichael
Test message. Please ignore. John -

Test message - no text

2002-09-17 Thread Tony Moss
No text Tony Moss -

Test Message - please ignore

2002-03-26 Thread Tony Moss
I think I've been excommunicated again. Recent messages to the SML weren't reflected back to me. Tonmy M. -

Re: Test Message - Plese ignor

2002-03-14 Thread Mac Oglesby
Tony M - Hi Tony, You'll be please to learn that your message arrived here loud and clear. :-) Mac -

Test Message - Plese ignor

2002-03-14 Thread Tony Moss
Testing again Tony M -

Re: Test Message - please ignore

2001-11-27 Thread Ron Anthony
Tony, Sorry Tony, only test message are allow thru. ++ron - Original Message - From: "Tony Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sundial Mail List" Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:06 PM Subject: Test Message - please ignore > I think I've been exc

Test Message - please ignore

2001-11-27 Thread Tony Moss
I think I've been excommunicated from the List again as I've sent two messages recently which haven't appeared - or which didn't come to me. Tony Moss

Test message No 2 - please ignore

2001-07-25 Thread Tony Moss
Test No 2. For anyone who's actually opened this message, my connection to the SML is somewhat erratic and a message I sent yesterday hasn't appeared yet. Let's see if this one does. ** It didn't so this is a second attempt. Tony M.

excusez-moi, address test

2001-07-18 Thread Steve Irick

Test Message - please ignore

2001-07-14 Thread Tony Moss
Test Message - please ignore

Test message - please ignore

2001-04-23 Thread Tony Moss
Test message - please ignore.

SoCal ELN Test

2001-04-03 Thread Larry McDavid
Access test only. -- Best wishes, Larry McDavid W6FUB Anaheim, CA (20 miles southeast of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)

Unblockage test

2001-04-02 Thread Ron Anthony
Just a test

Just test

2000-09-26 Thread Ron Anthony
Just a test

Please Ignore - Test!!!

1997-01-10 Thread Ralf Wimmershoff
-- === Ralf Wimmershoff | | Universit"at zu K"oln| Tel.: 0221-478-5587 Regionales Rechenzentrum | Fax: 0221-478-5590 Robert-Koch-Str. 10 | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] D-50931 K"oln