Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:00:16AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
fproxy will timeout and then I have to start again. And then it won't even
grab the parts it previously downloaded successfully So over a period of
weeks my perception is that I eventually move
Just curious. Does Freenet depend on one or a few specific machines to
continue? In other words, is there any server(say Matthew's or Ian's)
that is running code or maintaining data without which Freenet would
die, or is Freenet truly living a life of it's own out in the nodelands?
On Wed,
miguel writes:
Just curious. Does Freenet depend on one or a few specific machines to
continue? In other words, is there any server(say Matthew's or Ian's)
that is running code or maintaining data without which Freenet would
die, or is Freenet truly living a life of it's own out in the
My build 60149 node has been up for about 2 hours now, and according to
http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/inbound_request_histogram.txt, it
hasn't handled a single inbound request yet. OCM shows lots of inbound
requests, though. Also, I'm seeing a fair number of these in the logs:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require an academic university level of bandwidth
This is because of an interaction between 60149 and 60147's bugs. I am
resetting the unstable network. Anyone who wants in early, please mail
me and I will send you seednodes and a jar. I won't update the snapshots
until there are at least 10 nodes on the new network.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work
at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require an
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet
managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB cap, not good. Anyway,
that's the sort of transfer you can expect -
Different views on what's realistic? Will Freenet just be a US or bandwidth
rich countries project? The government in New Zealand has decided that
256/256 is the highest broadband speed that our telecom monomoply needs to
make available to competitors. :-(
128/128 is the fastest connection
