Hello everyone.
I started a node on a machine with lots of bandwidth and a very
lousy I/O subsystem. Not much else is going on on the machine, so
without freenet the load is steadily between 0.01 and 0.10. When
freenet runs, the load is constantly around 3.50, with peaks
reaching well above 5.00.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 19 July 2004 15:14, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Hello everyone.
I started a node on a machine with lots of bandwidth and a very
lousy I/O subsystem. Not much else is going on on the machine, so
without freenet the load is steadily between
Roger Oksanen wrote:
I run freenet niced at +10 on a 2x500MHz computer, load stays at 2-3 all
the time.
Ah yes, I forgot to mention that. It's niced at 19. Beats me how
something that's niced 19 can bring the load to 5.00, but that's
a different issue.
I suspect the problem you have lies in the
Hello,
yesterday, there was a post on the Frost-board
freenet where the anonymous poster claims to have
found a severe freenet exploit. He explains that he
could determine anyones IP address, no matter how many
hops the person is away from his own node. (for
details see the attached message).
I
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Hello everyone.
I started a node on a machine with lots of bandwidth and a very
lousy I/O subsystem. Not much else is going on on the machine, so
without freenet the load is steadily between 0.01 and 0.10. When
freenet runs,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:37:41PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
I run freenet niced at +10 on a 2x500MHz computer, load stays at 2-3 all
the time.
I suspect the problem you have lies in the fact that freenet will eat
ALL available bandwidth that you give it, which will lead to
starvation,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Roger Oksanen wrote:
I run freenet niced at +10 on a 2x500MHz computer, load stays at 2-3 all
the time.
Ah yes, I forgot to mention that. It's niced at 19. Beats me how
something that's niced 19 can bring the load to
Toad wrote:
Strange. What is your logLevel ?
Well, that's relative. The log level is set to debug, but the
log file is a FIFO, where a simple perl script greps for URIs
and dumps the rest. My idea was to feed those URIs to mnogosearch
and create a non-anonymous search engine fo freenet.
Won't make
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Arnold Weizendrescher wrote:
Hello,
yesterday, there was a post on the Frost-board
freenet where the anonymous poster claims to have
found a severe freenet exploit. He explains that he
could determine anyones IP address, no matter how many
hops the
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Strange. What is your logLevel ?
Well, that's relative. The log level is set to debug, but the
log file is a FIFO, where a simple perl script greps for URIs
and dumps the rest. My idea was to feed those URIs to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
I recommend you set the following:
logLevelDetail=freenet.client:debug
You did uncomment it, right?
Of course :)
...that now the URIs don't get logged. '
That's strange. What URIs were you after?
Toad wrote:
The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces
the useability of freenet
Of course. There are ways to implement search, however. Sooner or later
somebody will implement a good spider based anonymous search.
I searched a bit on the web. At
I wrote:
Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion
up to this point is probably a meaningless exchange based
on some misunderstanding on my part. But what?
[URIs from logs]
Would be interested to see some of this list.
Duh. So am I by now, but with all the messing around
13 matches
Mail list logo
