[freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Bob
Matthew Toseland writes: --snip-- > No, there will be an opennet. It will probably operate on similar > principles to the current 0.5 network, but will be 0.7. > > > > We could have a rotating public nodes system like we currently do with > > seednodes.ref, but surely this would horribly break

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Following the post named "Hypothetical question", I'd like to expose you a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong. We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on the opennet which is

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050917/414f9b71/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
connect if > > I don't already know someone") would be greately appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > --- John > > Bob -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050917/8778b18f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
//freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050917/3c91daee/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Bob
John Meeks writes: > The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing > about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, > how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking this about the next > version, since it says you can only connect if a

[freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread John Meeks
The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking this about the next version, since it says you can only connect if a "friend" lets you. Assuming I

[freenet-support] "Could not find the Main class" error

2005-09-17 Thread Jim Q.
Hi, I had problem installing Freenet because it will fail to download software during installation. Matthew helped me with that so I copied some of the software it was having difficulty with in the installation directory but now at the end of the installation I get the following error: "Java

[freenet-support] rfi: FCP API for 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050917/c7f11f9e/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Could not find the Main class error

2005-09-17 Thread Jim Q.
Hi, I had problem installing Freenet because it will fail to download software during installation. Matthew helped me with that so I copied some of the software it was having difficulty with in the installation directory but now at the end of the installation I get the following error: Java

[freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread John Meeks
The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking this about the next version, since it says you can only connect if a friend lets you. Assuming I

Re: [freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:26:40AM -0400, John Meeks wrote: The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking this about the next version, since

[freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Bob
John Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking this about the next version, since it says you can only

Re: [freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread John Meeks
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: You will have to use the opennet, which is considerably less secure. I didn't realize that there will still be an opennet. Will this be in version 0.7, or will there be two different versions, depending on whether you want to use the

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong. We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on the opennet which is

Re: [freenet-support] Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:35:16AM -0400, John Meeks wrote: On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: You will have to use the opennet, which is considerably less secure. I didn't realize that there will still be an opennet. Will this be in version 0.7, or will there be two

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:53:27PM +, Bob wrote: John Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The new information about version 0.7 sounds pretty good, but one thing about it concerns me. Assuming I don't know anyone who is using freenet, how do I get onto the network? (Remember, I'm asking

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong. We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't enough to form a

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a écrit : On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong. We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it

[freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread Bob
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --snip-- No, there will be an opennet. It will probably operate on similar principles to the current 0.5 network, but will be 0.7. We could have a rotating public nodes system like we currently do with seednodes.ref, but surely this would

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Hypothetical question...

2005-09-17 Thread John Meeks
It seems to me that finding people to communicate with (trust) is the hard part, and actually communicating with them is the easy part. The opennet allows you to not have to trust people, since everything is anonymous, and thus solves the hard problem (in addition to the easy one). The friends