[freenet-support] Re: "Could not find the Main class" error

2005-09-20 Thread Jim Q.
I have tried upgrading Java 4.2 to 5 but that did not help. Now I have installed Java 4.1 but same error "Could not find the Main Class" keeps popping up when Freenet.exe createconfig command is executed. >From: Bob >Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org >To: support at freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is "clusters of isolated dark nodes", which is worse? >>>

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/d59ea6f4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> >>> Which reduces "globally scalable darknet" to "clusters of dark nodes >>> hanging off the opennet". >>> >> >> Well, if

[freenet-support] Re: "Could not find the Main class" error

2005-09-20 Thread Jim Q.
Bob, Thanks for gettiing back to me. I have re-downloaded all .jar files but it fails after it downloads freenet.exe. Once it executes freenet.exe to create default.ini, it fails at mergeconfig command. THat is where I get the "Could not find the main class" error. Thanks Regards, Jim >From:

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/b1a3929b/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a >>> pure >>> darknet. We will need an opennet as well,

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
me: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/bec9a387/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: > It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure > darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have > something for people to download from freenetproject.org. I see no reason for there to be a separate

[freenet-support] Re: Connection Issue

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
e at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/08df7423/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Re: Connection Issue

2005-09-20 Thread Jake Speed
Matthew Toseland writes: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote: > > I had been using Freenet for about a week without an > > issue. After having to restart, Freenet would just > > keep trying to connect forever without success. > > Trying to connect? What do you mean?

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Connection Issue

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
Your node file is corrupt. Delete it. On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:58:57PM +, Jake Speed wrote: Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote: I had been using Freenet for about a week without an issue. After having to

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread remailer
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- Message-type: plaintext In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Matthew Toseland a ?crit : On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: As

Re: [freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a

2005-09-20 Thread remailer
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- Message-type: plaintext In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical expert found it fascinating. Some

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have something for people to download from

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: Which reduces globally scalable darknet to clusters of dark nodes hanging off the opennet. Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is clusters of isolated

RE: [freenet-support] Re: Could not find the Main class error

2005-09-20 Thread Jim Q.
Bob, Thanks for gettiing back to me. I have re-downloaded all .jar files but it fails after it downloads freenet.exe. Once it executes freenet.exe to create default.ini, it fails at mergeconfig command. THat is where I get the Could not find the main class error. Thanks Regards, Jim From:

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse? There would be no real reason to grow the darknet, that's the

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse? There would be no

RE: [freenet-support] Re: Could not find the Main class error

2005-09-20 Thread Jim Q.
I have tried upgrading Java 4.2 to 5 but that did not help. Now I have installed Java 4.1 but same error Could not find the Main Class keeps popping up when Freenet.exe createconfig command is executed. From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@freenetproject.org To:

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is