I have tried upgrading Java 4.2 to 5 but that did not help. Now I have
installed Java 4.1 but same error "Could not find the Main Class" keeps
popping up when Freenet.exe createconfig command is executed.
>From: Bob
>Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
>To: support at freenetproject.org
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
"clusters of isolated dark nodes", which is worse?
>>>
.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/d59ea6f4/attachment.pgp>
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Which reduces "globally scalable darknet" to "clusters of dark nodes
>>> hanging off the opennet".
>>>
>>
>> Well, if
Bob,
Thanks for gettiing back to me. I have re-downloaded all .jar files but it
fails after it downloads freenet.exe. Once it executes freenet.exe to create
default.ini, it fails at mergeconfig command. THat is where I get the "Could
not find the main class" error.
Thanks
Regards,
Jim
>From:
was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/b1a3929b/attachment.pgp>
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a
>>> pure
>>> darknet. We will need an opennet as well,
me: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/bec9a387/attachment.pgp>
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure
> darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have
> something for people to download from freenetproject.org.
I see no reason for there to be a separate
e at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050920/08df7423/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland writes:
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote:
> > I had been using Freenet for about a week without an
> > issue. After having to restart, Freenet would just
> > keep trying to connect forever without success.
>
> Trying to connect? What do you mean?
Your node file is corrupt. Delete it.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:58:57PM +, Jake Speed wrote:
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote:
I had been using Freenet for about a week without an
issue. After having to
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
As
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical
expert found it fascinating. Some
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure
darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have
something for people to download from
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a
pure
darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Which reduces globally scalable darknet to clusters of dark nodes
hanging off the opennet.
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
clusters of isolated
Bob,
Thanks for gettiing back to me. I have re-downloaded all .jar files but it
fails after it downloads freenet.exe. Once it executes freenet.exe to create
default.ini, it fails at mergeconfig command. THat is where I get the Could
not find the main class error.
Thanks
Regards,
Jim
From:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse?
There would be no real reason to grow the darknet, that's the
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse?
There would be no
I have tried upgrading Java 4.2 to 5 but that did not help. Now I have
installed Java 4.1 but same error Could not find the Main Class keeps
popping up when Freenet.exe createconfig command is executed.
From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@freenetproject.org
To:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
22 matches
Mail list logo