e the problem.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090425/97eb1dae/attachment.pgp>
ls yet, sorry!). If lots of users offer
> very little bandwidth each, would the extra key size mean potentially
slowing
> things down?
No, this would just be the top level, the keys you quote on FMS or client on
links. It would not affect lower levels.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090425/9ae6e255/attachment.pgp>
the real cost is a longer
URI. This is not a big problem?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090425/ebe1668c/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> ... IF the 3 nodes which stored it to their datastores are online
> when you fetch and there aren't any problems contacting them (e.g. on
> darknet they might have swapped).
I'm still a little confused about what a routing key is. You
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:15:43 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote:
> > 1. It seems that when keys are posted on FMS (not so much frost),
> > they often get chopped off at 80 characters, leaving the user to
> > remove the newlines by hand. If
On Thursday 23 April 2009 17:25:11 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
GORY DETAILS:
Currently we use:
CHK@routing key,crypto key,extra
(Filenames afterwards are manifests, and therefore impact on the CHK)
Isn't the first part supposed
On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote:
On Thursday 23 April 2009 06:16:40 am Matthew Toseland wrote:
Anecdotal evidence suggests that right now at least one third of our
content persistence problems boil down to this one bug: I added it 2
weeks
ago and it still hasn't
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:15:43 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote:
1. It seems that when keys are posted on FMS (not so much frost),
they often get chopped off at 80 characters, leaving the user to
remove the newlines by hand. If the keys
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
... IF the 3 nodes which stored it to their datastores are online
when you fetch and there aren't any problems contacting them (e.g. on
darknet they might have swapped).
I'm still a little confused about what a routing key is. You
