What you actually said was, in your own annoying paste style:
"Frustrating? Can't be! It has much improved, *much* I say. If you don't
believe me, ask toad and Ian!Even the simulations say so! We have NIO
and
NGR now, so things definately have improved for noobs like you, whatever
you
may think ab
On 1 Dec 2004, at 10:05, Newsbyte wrote:
> Now, may I ask you if you feel I have helped/supported you with my
posts? I
ask that, because I just got emailed by Ian saying he kicked me out of
the
project (well, at least he disabled my freenetproject account)
I wasn't aware that you were ever "in" t
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:05:00 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
>300MB is very little, to be honest. But of course it depends on the size of
>your HD. Normally, it is (should be) set to 10% of your free HD-space.
The default was 256MB, but the HD I installed Freenet on only had 1 GB free...
>Now, may I ask y
"Is that good or bad? Interestingly, even that many connections use very
little of my bandwidth."
It's rather good. It's way more then my average Open connections, and it
indicates that it's not really a firewall/NAT problem.
"BTW, how big should the cache, or 'store' be? I guess the 300 MB I've
