Re: [freenet-support] Problems ...

2010-05-14 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 23 April 2010 07:09:53 arra...@gmx.net wrote: > ... I do have not (at least with Freenet ;) ) > > Just wanted to let you know, that on my rig downloading, installing and > running Freenet was absolutly painless. Even loading what must be the > most popular pages worked within seconds!

Re: [freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-11 Thread urza9814
I've had that problem before actually, though it was on Freenet 0.5. Is there still a way to set bandwidth limits? That's what I had to do. Freenet saturated the network so heavily that while it was running _nothing_ else would work. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Fri, Oct

Re: [freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-11 Thread Juiceman
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM, wrote: > hi. > Internet through a router. > after installing freenet, lost internet in opera, mozila, ie8 > emule and utorrent working properly. > how to fix? It is possible that Freenet traffic is overloading your poor router, though if you can torrent this seem

Re: [freenet-support] Problems

2009-06-19 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:31:17 Andrew Mathison wrote: > Browser does not open after install. I use Firefox. > > I have installed 4 times in English, all the same problems. > > I use Deutsch WinXP Pro. Ok. You installed Freenet using the windows installer (FreenetInstaller-1222.exe), the insta

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-06-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 29 May 2009 15:49:34 Walker Bohannan wrote: > Dear Support, > > I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access > certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're > doing and everything downloaded and installed fine but then when it > opened up

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-31 Thread Luke771
Edward Langenback wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Walker Bohannan wrote: > >> Dear Support, >> >> I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access >> certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're >> doing >> > > That

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-30 Thread Edward Langenback
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walker Bohannan wrote: > Dear Support, > > I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access > certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're > doing That reads to me like you're trying to use Freenet as a p

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser

2009-05-30 Thread steve
Does activity monitor show the wrapper process running? There should be something like "wrapper-macosx-universal-32", it may be cut off though. If that isn't in the process list, Freenet isn't actually running. You can start it manually by opening a terminal and running "/Applications/Freenet/run.s

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
So you installed Freenet, it opened a browser, you clicked on the link to go to http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/ ? Please send us your wrapper.log. On Monday 11 February 2008 14:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: > Hi, > I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? > First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.1

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-12 Thread Darren Jones
I installed freenet on 10.5.1 and have had no issues during the install or using freenet, if that helps anybody track down this error. Darren On 11 Feb 2008, at 14:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: Hi, I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and us

Re: [freenet-support] problems with config

2008-02-11 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 12/02/2008, at 03:42, Jean-Claude Féret wrote: > Hi, > I guess you feel better if I do write in English ? > First of all, I'm on OS X 10.4.10 and used upto now Azureus and > mlDonkey (occasionally LimeWire or Ants) > Having heard about freenet, I did download it, and followed the > install

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-06 Thread toad
; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:55:53 +> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > support@freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with > > Frost> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You are running Frost on the same machine > > as Freenet? You are running> the mo

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-03 Thread Jeroen Veldt
yes i am. i have node 993 now but still not working don't have any clue i am still in need of help > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:55:53 +> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Y

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-03 Thread toad
thanks> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:48:39 +> To: > support@freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with > Frost> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There was a problem with *uploading* > messages from Frost, fixed in> 992...> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
i am running node 992 but the problem still excistsany other suggestions are more then welcomethanks> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:48:39 +> To: support@freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There was a problem with *u

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
netproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost> > One of the things to make sure is that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high> priority (and definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to> wait until other stuff completes fi

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread toad
There was a problem with *uploading* messages from Frost, fixed in 992... On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Jeroen Veldt wrote: > > Dear Sir, Ever since about 2 weeks i have problems with Frost. > Frost does not refresh any boards, no messages are shown nothing happens. I > can not uploa

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Volodya
One of the things to make sure is that you don't set any downloads/inserts to the high priority (and definitely not emergency). If you do that then frost will always have to wait until other stuff completes first. Alternatively you can do soft rather than hard priority setting.

RE: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread Jeroen Veldt
Thank you so much, i will send them tonight. I just have to so a search for frost.log and send you the content, right? > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:28:09 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: support@freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [fre

Re: [freenet-support] problems with Frost

2006-11-01 Thread bbackde
Please check your frost.log file for any error messages. If you want you could send me the log files for analysis, but if you want to then send them directly to me, NOT to the support list! rgds, bback, frost developer. On 11/1/06, Jeroen Veldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Sir, Ever since a

Re: [freenet-support] Problems when starting up

2005-10-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
What build of freenet are you running? I don't recognize the problem below... On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:49:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello! > > I run freenet on linux with newest Sun-JRE (PIII, 256 MB) and it often seems > to have starting-problems: > > Sometimes it starts alre

Re: [freenet-support] problems starting node

2004-12-07 Thread Toad
Hmm. Delete freenet entirely and then reinstall. This is a corrupt routing table, I think... On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:42:38PM +, Amir Kabil wrote: > please find below error message what do i do next? > node did work then stopped > please help > > Dec 5, 2004 7:51:24 PM (freenet.node.Main, m

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windowsperspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Don Gregory
2004 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a > windowsperspective. > > > Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in > CVS has all > traces of the Transient property removed. > > So you won

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Jay Oliveri
Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all traces of the Transient property removed. So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable (build 5091). On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote: > Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.

2004-08-19 Thread Don Gregory
Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice. Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet, etc... It's easy enough to fix anway. I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to manually change the config file to have "Transie

Re: [freenet-support] problems starting freenet

2004-07-29 Thread Niklas Bergh
Have a look at http://www.freenethelp.org/   cheers /N - Original Message - From: carter45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:31 PM Subject: [freenet-support] problems starting freenet obviously I a a newbie...bown loaded freenet, and the

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious > >causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's > >a problem

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sångberg
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's a problem with RNFs, and all I can say is we are working on it on unstable with the new

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:16:21PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:01:36 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Are there any incoming connections? Go to the web interface, click on > >Advanced mode if necessary, and click on Open Connections. If there are > >no incoming

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:06:46PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > > Toad, > > > > Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost > > to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections, > > al

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Max Moritz Sievers
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed Sångberg wrote: > Toad, > > Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost > to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections, > almost none transferring data, very little data going through at all - and > I oft

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sångberg
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:01:36 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Go to the web interface, click on Advanced mode if necessary, and click on Open Connections. If there are no incoming connections after 2 days, something relatively obvious is wrong. Second, the

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Daniele wrote: > Hi! > I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines: > one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2. > I've encountered some problems in both the installations. > In Windows XP i've correctly i

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with tech mailing list?

2004-01-21 Thread Tapio Valli
Hello, I am having difficulties my emails through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use that address but my mails haven't made it to list so far? Anyway, my problem below persists and now it appears to be blocking the connectivity for Frost client as Frost can't update lists and in freenet.log I am gettin

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with tech mailing list?

2004-01-21 Thread Ian Clarke
Did you send the email from the same email address you used to subscribe? Ian. Victor Denisov wrote: Hello, I've subcribed to the tech mailing list, received a confirmation and then (a couple of hours later) sent an e-mail to it. Contrary to my expectations, I've received a reply telling me that

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
yeah... castrated.. lol - Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet ___ suppo

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > actually, it comes to me as attachments. anf the attachments are 1 txt and 1 > DAT That's how PGP signed e-mails look. Your e-mail client is Outlook Express -- it can't handle MIME properly. (Or your MTA has been broken beyond repair.) > most likely because of

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
ober 28, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply > to this

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply > to this thread. thanks. Your server is fscked. My client does not send HTML attachments, i

RE: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread William_dw -- Sqlcoders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:support-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mike > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet > > > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > serve

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
nt: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Josh Steiner
my uniformed guess is that since all routing of data is done totally peer to peer, the network is going to be pretty flakey for the next few hours while all these new slashdot nodes come online. its just a matter of dillution... suddenly there is a massive flood of nodes that dont know how to

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Mike
boom, try this... right click on the rabbit, and select configure and select the Fproxy, for giggles. set the port to 8081 to test the connectivity. I was using the default port and i had the same issue. changed it to 8081 (it is the default for the 0.4 release) and now i get many sites. :P

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:33:52PM -, Boom wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there :) > > Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples >freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 01:09:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> simple. > >> >> > >> >> when trying to download a fec from freenet: > >> >Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file > >> >that is no longer valid for new builds. > >> > >> yes, it is, in fact

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
> > alright, 519 is up > > i d/l the tgz, stopped the node, extracted freenet.jer and ext.jar to the freenet >directory, overwriting the old files > > i did NOT touch the config file and despite i'm running windows (no new start of >the installer) a splitfile upload actually > > >>SUCCEEDED<< wit

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> simple. >> >> >> >> when trying to download a fec from freenet: >> >Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file >> >that is no longer valid for new builds. >> >> yes, it is, in fact 517 >> >> am i missing some config lines? splease be so nice and prompt them in

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 01:09:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> simple. > >> >> > >> >> when trying to download a fec from freenet: > >> >Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file > >> >that is no longer valid for new builds. > >> > >> yes, it is, in fact

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:08:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> simple. > >> > >> when trying to download a fec from freenet: > >Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file > >that is no longer valid for new builds. > > yes, it is, in fact 517 > > am i missin

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> simple. >> >> when trying to download a fec from freenet: >Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file >that is no longer valid for new builds. yes, it is, in fact 517 am i missing some config lines? splease be so nice and prompt them into the support ml :) >>

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:11:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > simple. > > when trying to download a fec from freenet: Is this a new node? It's possible that there is crud in your config file that is no longer valid for new builds. > >> > 16.10.2002 22:58:16 (freenet.client.http.FproxyServl

Re: [freenet-support] problems with FEC

2002-10-16 Thread the bishop
> ... > java version "1.4.0_01" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode) > (tested with 1.3.0, too, but no changes) > ... first of all, 1.4.0 is a beta version. try 1.4.1 or later, or use IBMs JDK. secon

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with automatic Windows installer

2002-07-11 Thread Stephan Balmer
Hi Konrad you can't use freenet behind a proxy. Freenet contacts a whole lot of other freenet nodes on seemingly random ports with its own protocol. Even most firewalls are restrictive enough to totally disable freenet. Sorry, no way. Stephan > > Hi! > > I have Win NT and I was trying to in

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Java?

2002-06-05 Thread Max Balduino
Hey, you just seem to have my exactly identical problem!! Here is my previous post, where i complained about being unable to run start-freenet on a slackware 8.0 with jdk1.2.2: * Hi, when I run ./start-freenet.sh, I receive the following messages: Exception in

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet under Mac OS X 10.1

2001-11-01 Thread Zachary Copley
On Saturday, October 20, 2001, at 05:52 PM, Zachary Copley wrote: > I'm having terrible trouble gettting Freenet 0.3.9.2 to work with Mac OS > X 10.1. The node starts up, but then I can't retrieve any keys. Well, since the latest release of Freenet doesn't work with Mac OS X 10.1 (even though

RE: [freenet-support] problems w\ .4 snapshot on win95

2001-10-31 Thread tech
Hi, I tried it too. All the seeds node are bad. Would you please send me a "mainstream" seed node to start? Also, I suggest getting the seed.ref file encrypted. Otherwise, some authorities will block the seed nodes immediately, and will track down who is using freenet just by monitoring who is t

Re: [freenet-support] problems w\ .4 snapshot on win95

2001-10-31 Thread Sebastian Späth
Muzzle wrote: > I recently tried to install the oct 28 and oct 24 snapshot of the developing freenet >on a p120, win95, 24mb of ram, jre 1.3.1, with an ISDN internet connection. > Both snapshots come out w\ the same error. > When the installer tried to exec the configuration program win answer

Re: [freenet-support] problems

2001-07-04 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
spitfir3 schrieb am 2001-07-04, 13:14: > ihave a problem: when i start freenet.exe there is the ms internet explorer and in >the window is the text: > "Connection refused" There are some other problems, too, or why did i get this mail 18 times till now? gph -- =^..^= __

Re: [freenet-support] problems

2001-07-02 Thread Greg Wooledge
Felix Puetsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > b) what is cation.positive-internet.com that is connected after > starting your software?! cation.positive-internet.comA 195.8.71.92 www.octayne.com A 195.8.71.92 When version 0.3 of Freenet starts up, it contacts http://www.oct

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Thomas Formella
Rob Cakebread wrote: > > I'm waiting until XML-RPC is fixed in an upcoming release of Freenet. > When that is working I'll have a command line client that doesn't rely > on KeyIndexClient. It is written in Python. For now you can download > keys with it, but the inserting part doesn't work becaus

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Thomas Formella
Rob Cakebread wrote: > > You might try upgrading to JDK 1.3 as I think HashSet has only been > around since JDK 1.2. It also looks like you aren't trying to retrieve the > same key you inserted, or am I missing something? > > You are inserting the key: > test300601.html > > but trying to retrie

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with KeyIndexClient

2001-06-30 Thread Rob Cakebread
On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:55 pm, Thomas Formella wrote: > When I try to retrieve a input key by: > > java -classpath ... Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -serverAddress > tcp/127.0.0.1:19335 -list 30062001test > > (I inserted a test key before: java -classpath ... > Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -s

Re: [freenet-support] problems galore

2001-06-06 Thread mark . humphrey
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:29:30PM +0100, BigYin wrote: > I am useing version 0.3.9.1: > > > I have just install'd the program but am getting the message > that it couldnt find the java runtime.It directed me to the jave.sun.com site but i >didnt find much joy there.Pressed the update button b