On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> > >=20
> > > And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer
> > > to talk to *this* li
> > What exactly happens? I don't think the spam filtering we have on dodo
> > would arbitrarily discard messages from DSL hosts, they might be
> > slightly more likely to be held...
>
> It seems dodo is using the blacklist server SORBS (www.dnsbl.sorbs.net).
This definately will discard messages
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> >=20
> > And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer
> > to talk to *this* list is that Shaw in theory can now look at my mail
> > traffic and if they don't like
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 11:17, Toad wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> > Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from
> > subscribed members only. Having to go thru the ISP mail server is a MAJOR
> > privacy concern for me (I k
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
> And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer
> to talk to *this* list is that Shaw in theory can now look at my mail
> traffic and if they don't like the Freenet project, could suspend my
> inter
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:53, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
> Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from
> subscribed members only.
Testing to see if I can send mail in. My email is hosted on
my own server. I have a "send permitted from" record in the
DNS for my doma
