Hi to all,
I installed the last 0.80.4-embedded on a WRAP 1E board as usual.
There is still some minor bugs. One step on two step back, in the
0.80-embedded release there was only the DHCP relay problem:
- in "status"==>interfaces" now the WAN (who is in DHCP) appears
"down" but it's perfectly up
On 8/26/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, if that's the controls you want applied to authenticated
> clients. Sounds like that's a bug though. Scott or someone will have
> to comment there.
Chris is absolutely correct.
I'll drag all the equipment back out tomorrow and retest
On 8/26/05, denny halim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can i run servers (web/mail/proxy/etc) within virtual machine?
> perhaps using qemu/UML/xen?
VMWare works quite nice. Still waiting for XEN support to actually
be commited to FreeBSD.Doesn't look promising for RELENG_6.
Scott
---
how can i run servers (web/mail/proxy/etc) within virtual machine?
perhaps using qemu/UML/xen?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All--
Outgoing load balancing now works as of 0.80.4.
Please follow http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=OutgoingLoadBalancing
to set it up.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Please send me the contents of /tmp/ after a failed install attempt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
On 8/26/05, Simon SZE-To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried the latest ISO installer, but my problem still here as I send to
> this list a week ago.
>
> Below is my mail has been s
Hello,
I've tried the latest ISO installer, but my problem still here as I send to this list a week ago.
Below is my mail has been sent before.
--
Hello,
I run the "installer" and after I partition the disk (I have only
create one partition with * size, FreeBSD type and active status
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:23 PM 8/26/2005, Chris Buechler wrote:
> >On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> > > misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block a
At 07:23 PM 8/26/2005, Chris Buechler wrote:
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
> until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule i
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
> until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule in I
> had before.
Not a misunderstanding, t
Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule in I
had before. So... I removed it and now access is not allowed until I
go through the portal page. Stil
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only LiveCD's that I found on 4 different sites were
> "pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso", with no minor version appended. After looking at
> 4 sites, I stopped trying to find any more versions.
>
> According to my System:Firmware:AutoUpdate pa
The only LiveCD's that I found on 4 different sites were
"pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso", with no minor version appended. After looking at
4 sites, I stopped trying to find any more versions.
According to my System:Firmware:AutoUpdate page:
Category InstalledCurrent
Firmware 0.80 0.6
This was with 0.80.2?
Scott
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It worked this time. Not sure why the last attempt failed.
>
> 256MB RAM for the virtual machine
> 4GB of disk
>
> This time around, the installer didn't error out, didn't reboot, and I got
> the intaller as
It worked this time. Not sure why the last attempt failed.
256MB RAM for the virtual machine
4GB of disk
This time around, the installer didn't error out, didn't reboot, and I got
the intaller asking about boot blocks and then asking me to reboot and
remove the hard drive.
What is strange is
How much ram do you have? 128 is the recommended minimum.
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:53 AM 8/26/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> >0.71? Thats OLD.
> >
> >Please download a 0.80 series iso.
>
> No, .71 was the version I just checked, and that ~works~. 0.80 is th
At 11:53 AM 8/26/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
0.71? Thats OLD.
Please download a 0.80 series iso.
No, .71 was the version I just checked, and that ~works~. 0.80 is the one
that failed.
I just retried (after moving the CD to be the slave of the hard drive), and
I found the source of the rebo
I have the exact same problem when I use MS Virtual Server. The fix for
me was to move the virtual cdrom to the same channel as my virtual hard
drive, then it worked perfectly.
Betcha a nickel you can get it to install now... :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
Fr
0.71? Thats OLD.
Please download a 0.80 series iso.
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:47 AM 8/26/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
> >This wouldn't happen to be a repeat of the "cdrom on the same channel"
> >issue, is it?
>
> Well, it's a virtual CDROM, but it happens to
At 11:47 AM 8/26/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
This wouldn't happen to be a repeat of the "cdrom on the same channel"
issue, is it?
Well, it's a virtual CDROM, but it happens to be on a different channel
(it's the master on channel 1, the hard drive is master on channel 0)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tried it again, and it fails in the same manner. I'll do it again,
concentrating on the end of the Freesbie install (I walked away during the
install, and it had rebooted. The 0.71.6 installer asked me more questions
and then warned me to take out the CD.) It appears that maybe the intall is
ab
This wouldn't happen to be a repeat of the "cdrom on the same channel"
issue, is it?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [p
Very strange. I just installed 0.80.4 inside vmware 5 workstation
running on xp and it worked perfectly.
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> At 10:52 AM 8/26/2005, Bill Plein wrote:
> >I am getting other issues with "installer". Here is the order of events
> >
> >1) B
At 10:52 AM 8/26/2005, Bill Plein wrote:
I am getting other issues with "installer". Here is the order of events
1) Boot the latest CD image (pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso)
2) Allow it to come up, I assign interfaces, and finally up to the menu
3) run "installer"
4) Partition disk, install
5) Reboot
I am getting other issues with "installer". Here is the order of events
1) Boot the latest CD image (pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso)
2) Allow it to come up, I assign interfaces, and finally up to the menu
3) run "installer"
4) Partition disk, install
5) Reboot (from disk, not from CD, verified by watchin
I had the same problem with the WAN interface a few days ago.
Reinstalling from a new iso to the same version that had the error
resolved the problem. I don't think it's the NICs.
(however, I am now having trouble installing from a new iso).
On 8/26/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Commited! Thanks!
Scott
On 8/25/05, DLStrout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to fix the following to files in the next update?
>
> /usr/local/www/diag_ipsec_sad.php
> /usr/local/www/diag_ipsec_spd.php
>
> Here is what I came up with ... let me know if I am wrong.
>
>
>
What kind of NICS?
On 8/26/05, Ted Crow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, versions 0.80->0.80.2 installed without *too* much trouble, and my
> remote network can now see the WAN and OPT interfaces.
>
> One thing I did notice with 0.80 and 0.80.2 is that my firewall hangs
> for about 5 minutes d
NOTE:
I wouldn't recommend trying to edit either of these 2 files through the
[webConfigurator: Diagnostics: Edit File] screen. I ssh'd to the
pfSense box and entered the shell and made the edits the old fashion way
w/ 'vi'.
Would it be possible to fix the following to files in the next up
Do you think you really need to go over this problem here.
This is the way freebsd works presently
This is the way a PIX works presently
This is not the way linux works presently.
This is not the way linksys works presently
If you cannot work with this don't use it.
Where is the problem. Perso
Another point I forgot to make was that split horizon DNS is not the
"cure all" as people suggest.
For example:
Public IP/Port: 123.45.67.89/80
Mapped to
Private IP/Port: 192.168.0.1/81
Split horizon DNS *cannot* solve this problem.
This *is* something we do (not with web ports, but with FTP si
I'm not sure I follow what you mean by "Put them off a routed public
IP'ed interface to solve this."
At one point, we had 2 interfaces per machine, 1 public and 1 private.
The problem with that was that the use of our IP space was extremely
ineffecient, not to mention that firewalling Windows 2000
32 matches
Mail list logo
