I’m working on install version 0.82.4 / 0.84 and seem
to be having some troubles. I have gotten it to work fine under vmware
though now that I’m trying to move it to a real machine it doesn’t
seem to like it.
Essentially after the LiveCD boots and I do my entire
interface configuration
Works fine here!
Ping output:
PING www.l.google.com (64.233.161.104): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.161.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=239 time=70.832 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.161.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=70.291 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.161.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=150.710 ms
--- www.l.google.co
From menu Diagnostics: Ping i`m unable ping adresses on
Internet.
But check version of PF works , also
works download of packages.
DNS name is converted to IP address
but response is none.
PING www.google.com (64.233.161.99): 56 data bytes
--- 64.233.161.99 ping statistics ---
3 packets
Thank you, for very usefull
explanation.
And what does mean Parent queue
(CBQ or HFSC only) and Default queue?
For example, if I have a line 1024kbit/s
download.
I will want create a queues 64, 128, 256,
284,384,512 kbit/s, where I want share just non used /in time/
bandwidth between q
Thanks this is now fixed. Should be present in 0.84.2 when it comes out.
Scott
On 9/10/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After setting password under menu of Ntop Settings, then loads a page with
> message -
>
> Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
> /usr/local/ww
Are you using traffic shaping and filling the downstream queue?
--BillOn 9/10/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is so slow
response from menu of PF ? Time is from 3 to 5 seconds on 100TX 3COM
card full duplexin PFsense drop down menu.
In mettalic is
responses more slower.
Class
I'm still somewhat working on the shaper and since I've taken about a
much needed 2 month break from it, I'm going to have to do a little
re-education.
Here's a little info right from the pf.conf man page:
The hfsc scheduler supports some additional options: realtime _sc_
Machine is Celeron 2.4gHz, 256MB RAM end on board Intel Exxtreme graphics.
Ok, Metalic is complex, but Pfsense drop down menu is quite slower then
classical menu.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:46 AM
To: Robo.K.
Cc: sup
After setting
password under menu of Ntop Settings, then loads a page with message -
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for
foreach() in /usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php(61) : eval()'d code on line 1 NTOP
Setup complete. You can now access NTOP under the Diagnostics menu. Warning:
Cannot modify he
The metallic theme is quite complex. Use the other themes for slower hardware.
Scott
On 9/10/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why is so slow response from menu of PF ? Time is from 3 to 5 seconds on
> 100TX 3COM card full duplexin PFsense drop down menu.
> In mettalic is responses
Why is so slow
response from menu of PF ? Time is from 3 to 5 seconds on 100TX 3COM
card full duplexin PFsense drop down menu.
In mettalic is
responses more slower.
Classic view is more
faster.Acceptable.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.
Plan author of TrafficShaper some expanation of use
the traffic shaper? Because one thing is
theory of HFSC and other thing is filling boxes Upperlimit Real time Link share
Parent queue ...?
There http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=HFSCBandwidthShapingNotes is some explanation, but not com
It works with SSH but not with SFTP. It will give you an error. I
know that is not was asked just adding this for archiving.
Scott
On 9/10/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Username 'admin' works too.
>
> --Bill
>
>
> On 9/10/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Username 'admin' works too.
--BillOn 9/10/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use the username root and the pfsense webConfigurator password.On 9/10/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> When I use a PUTTY for Windows and I`m tying acces pfesnese via SSh, Putty
> ask for me user name
Use the username root and the pfsense webConfigurator password.
On 9/10/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I use a PUTTY for Windows and I`m tying acces pfesnese via SSh, Putty
> ask for me user name and for password, but then window of Putty dismiss.
> This occurs on all versions
After complete the
traffic shaper wizard I go into any item of Queue and change anything , only
save queue, then in /firewall_shaper_queues.php in culmn Bandwidth
dismiss value of amount persents or kilobits. This box remains
empty.
10
RED
ECN
5
No
When I use a PUTTY
for Windows and I`m tying acces pfesnese via SSh, Putty ask for me user
name and for password, but then window of Putty dismiss.
This occurs on all
versions of PFSENSE. Wher is the problem?
Thanx.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Versio
They all have the same size cause they're all the same file (hard link). rm'ing that directory will save you a whopping 2.9 or so MB.
# ls -la rescue/ |wc -l
131
# du -sk rescue/
2891 rescue/
# du -sk rescue/*
2880 rescue/[
7 rescue/dhclient-script
1 rescue/nextboot.sh
# ls
Say what!? It shouldn't be that big.
# du -h
2.8M.
# pwd
/rescue
Scott
On 9/10/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry... I am trying to shrink a bit my pfsense installation.. in order to
> stay in less then 512Mb..
> So I took a walkabout, and I found that /rescue dir i
Kinda OT, but good info for someone possibly :)
Well, since we're sharing hardware platforms, here are two of my favorites:
http://www.advantech.com/products/Model_Detail.asp?model_id=1-U89QY&BU=NCG&PD=
http://www.mbx.com/oem/reference_platforms/RP-1013.cfm
Both have space for a Soekris 1411
Sorry... I am trying to shrink a bit my pfsense installation.. in order to stay in less then 512Mb..
So I took a walkabout, and I found that /rescue dir il very big (about
350MB), full of files all ow them of the same size: 2937504 bites.
Could anyone explain me how can that be usefull, and why a
Quoth Scott Ullrich:
> On 9/10/05, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I am looking at hacking it [PIMv2] into
> > firewall_rules_edit.php, so if anyone is working on it, please tell
> > me?
>
> It's safe to say that nobody is working on this that I know of.
So -
On 9/10/05, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
>
> > Is it possible to act on PIMv2 protocol from the GUI - or should I
> > address it otherwise. To be sure, pf itself sees and knows PIMv2.
>
> Actually, I am looking at hacking it into firewall_rules_edit.php,
ironsystems.com has great 1U half length P4 ~2.4GHz/256mb/80gb boxes
for like $800, have a ton of them at my workplace for DNS servers,
dhcp, etc etc. Dual fxp cards and room for an additional pci card,
dont know how fast the motherboard is in terms of keeping up with say
a 4 port 100mb card, but t
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
> Is it possible to act on PIMv2 protocol from the GUI - or should I
> address it otherwise. To be sure, pf itself sees and knows PIMv2.
Actually, I am looking at hacking it into firewall_rules_edit.php, so if
anyone is working on it, please tell me?
Marc
--
---M
Hello.
Is it possible to act on PIMv2 protocol from the GUI - or should I
address it otherwise. To be sure, pf itself sees and knows PIMv2.
As you know, PIMv1 is in IGMP and it is easy to clobber THAT ;-).
Thanks
-
To u
26 matches
Mail list logo
