Either your LAN or WAN interface doesn't support ALTQ. The wizard
cannot continue.
Using sis Ethernet cards and vlans on all interfaces. I had thought
that the code was committed to allow vlans with altq.
Look forward to hearing wheather this patch should be in pfsense at the
moment or
Hi,
I have a Lex box (the CV860A), but I can't get it to boot any version of
pfSense.
I'm trying to use the embedded image, but every one I've tried over the past
few weeks has hung at right after 'Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf'.
The little spinning line spins a few times and then just
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Yeah, I would give that a shot.
OK, I disabled the DNS-checks in sshd_config and I can now login and
paste you the rules.debug:
# cat rules.debug |egrep -v ^$
# System Aliases
lan = { ste0 }
wan = { ste3 }
pptp = { ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5
How can the httpd be restarted from the command line. I attempted
to run the php script from the command line but it failed looking for
credentials.
Do a ps auxww |grep http
and you will se full command line for whatever process (change or remove the
grep if you are looking for something else) you are looking to kill /restart
(unless you already killed it that is)
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd -c
**.php|**.cgi -u root -maxproc 16 -i
At 04:24 AM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
Either your LAN or WAN interface
doesn't support ALTQ. The wizard cannot continue.
Using sis Ethernet cards and vlans on all interfaces. I had thought that
the code was committed to allow vlans with altq.
Look forward to hearing wheather this patch should be
I was trying with 94.10
John
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:09 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Have resize instructions changed?
Could be. Please try our latest round of images.
On
Is this error at the beginning of the wizard, or the end? If the end,
it's a known bug that I haven't had time to dig into (and from other
reports, it's purely cosmetic - although you may need to resave the
normal filter policy and apply to force the shaper rules to load)).
--Bill
On 11/23/05,
The embedded image uses a serial console. I know nothing about the
Lex, but if you are using VGA with it, then this is as far as you'll
see it boot - try hooking up a serial cable.
--Bill
On 11/23/05, Adam Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a Lex box (the CV860A), but I can't get
Create a developer tag inside the system tag and you'll have a
developer menu (and anything else we use that tag for ;-P) which has a
restart http option. Of course, this requires that the http daemon is
running :) Otherwise, Espen already answered regarding the command
that runs (beware of
Interesting I think you are using fxp eth cards??? Is that right.
Mine are sis cards. That seems to be our
only difference.
I am testing on wrap platform have tried on
four different test boxes with four different images.
Using the latest images
with fresh installs now and still the
Everyone,
Been kinda laxed on the reporting issues to the
list lately, so here goes
Had a VERY sucessful run w/ 0.90 0.90a
- config backup snapped right in from prior ver.
0.8x.
- great ease w/ new ISO installs (no installer
issues).
Had relatively good luck w/ 0.94 ISO
- config
I tried that command but it gives some missig tihing I will have to have
another look at it
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 15:37
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] restarting httpd
Create a developer tag
Cool maybe. It is at the end
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 15:31
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] vlans and traffic shaping 0.94.10
Is this error at the beginning of the wizard, or the end? If the end,
Rainer,
Are you allowing DNS traffic outbound on the NIC facing your DNS servers?
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2:26 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Question about NAT
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 11/23/05, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying with 94.10
They have changed a little bit. We now use a uzipped /usr mount.
I'll see about getting this updated soon.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thanks for the note!
I will rebuild new images this weekend, if I am still in
town. :-((
Bao
On Wed, November 23, 2005 10:23 am, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 11/23/05, Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you trying to boot from a compact flash or a hard disk?
I have some old compact flash
Is it possible to just make a few empty images (128,256,512 etc) and
then just have us mount and copy the partition information inside it?
Not sure if that would make it any easier.
John
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005
I've posted this messege in the forum but I not received any responses for 2
days.
I want to setup an always up IPSEC tunnel between two PFSENSE gateways that have
dynamic IP addresses (cable modem and dsl modem). I know that this can be easily
done on IPCOP, however, PFSENSE seems to be light
Just a few comments... first off, the rules for Shareaza and Gnutella
seem to be identical, so you might choose to either remove Shareaza, or
rename it to Gnutella 2- and have it shape TCP as well as UDP packets on
6346 since G2 uses both protocols, instead of only TCP (which would be
At 02:10 PM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
I've posted this messege in the forum but I not received any responses for 2
days.
I want to setup an always up IPSEC tunnel between two PFSENSE
gateways that have
dynamic IP addresses (cable modem and dsl modem). I know that this
can be easily
done on
At 02:34 PM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
I'm not 100% sure Scott will probably need to jump in here to confirm.
In my tests even though you can put a dynamic-dns name in the field for
remote gateway it doesn't actually seem to do a lookup on it. If it did
it probably would work fine.
This is
I'm not 100% sure Scott will probably need to jump in here to confirm.
In my tests even though you can put a dynamic-dns name in the field for
remote gateway it doesn't actually seem to do a lookup on it. If it did
it probably would work fine.
This is probably not an incredibly difficult
Here's how it works. When the ip changes dhclient kicks off a script
which then reconfigures the tunnel. This should work now.
On 11/23/05, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not 100% sure Scott will probably need to jump in here to confirm.
In my tests even though you can put a
This is what happens when I try to restart
httpd with the below command
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd: No match.
**.cgi: No match.
I used this command since I am using https
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd -S -E
/var/etc/cert/pem -c **.php|**.cgi -u root -maxproc 16 -i
On 11/23/05, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably not an incredibly difficult thing to fix.
If I understand correctly, IPSEC tunnels can only be specified by mean
of their actual endpoints inside the SPD tables.
Angelo.
Here's how it works. When the ip changes
Try
/usr/local/sbin/mini_httpd -S -E /var/etc/cert/pem -c **.php|**.cgi
-u root -maxproc 16 -i /var/run/mini_httpd.pid
Notice the |, thats a pipe in shell-land.
On 11/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what happens when I try to restart httpd with the below command
Both machines need to be pfSense for this to work.
On 11/23/05, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/23/05, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably not an incredibly difficult thing to fix.
If I understand correctly, IPSEC tunnels can only be specified by mean
Very confused by this. Tried that one as well and I just get the
mini_httpd useage. The mini_httpd daemon is now not running but the pid
exists
If I run with no I get the results mentioned below. I wonder just
restart but there is an issue with the restart on the via board I am
using.
It does
Great I ll try the next release
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] vlans and traffic shaping 0.94.10
ok, should be fixed now, if what I just fixed was the
As a note/addition, does WinMX even exist anymore? That preset could be
removed.
Nelson Papel
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 14:22
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets
Just a few
This would be your lucky day ;)
On 11/23/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a few comments... first off, the rules for Shareaza and Gnutella
seem to be identical, so you might choose to either remove Shareaza, or
rename it to Gnutella 2- and have it shape TCP as well as UDP packets
Angelo Turetta wrote:
Yes, fine. And who's gonna tell your tunnel partner your address has
changed and their SPD must be changed? Do you have a protocol for doing
that in a standard way? What if you have a Cisco router on the other side?
it will be the same regardless of what you have on
I will add a feature for it to automatically talk to the 2nd firewall
and for it to tell the 2nd to reload its ipsec configuration. This
will solve all these problems.
Only stipulation is that both endpoints will need to be pfSense, but
thats not really something I'm concerned with as you
34 matches
Mail list logo
