Add a file to /usr/local/etc/rc.d
Scott
On 4/11/06, William M. Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Understood that their won't be support.is there a particular config
> file or rc startup file that this command could be added to so that that
> alias is added at startup?
>
>
> -Origina
Understood that their won't be support.is there a particular config
file or rc startup file that this command could be added to so that that
alias is added at startup?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:50 AM
To: support
On 4/10/06, William M. Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to do the equivalent of the following from a FreeBSD rc.conf file
> where fxp0 is the interface (can be sis0 or whatever)
>
> ifconfig_fxp0="inet 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 2.2.2.2 netmask 255.25
FYI,
ifconfig sis0 alias 1.1.1.1/24
Works when entered at the shell prompt. The real question is, how to
make this happen at startup.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:17 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
I want to do the equivalent of the following from a FreeBSD rc.conf file
where fxp0 is the interface (can be sis0 or whatever)
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 2.2.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"
I don't care if it has to be done from an ssh prompt.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm tired and I'm making stupid mistakes. My claim that the fault was
Windoze was incorrect. I still do not have proper packet forwarding.
I have more data.
If I check the option under system_advanced labeled 'Disable the
firewalls filter altogethe
PS...proxy arp virtual IP type _might_ do what you want, I suspect not though.
--Bill
On 4/10/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/10/06, William M. Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to add IP aliases to the LAN interface? I would like to have
> > more t
On 4/10/06, William M. Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to add IP aliases to the LAN interface? I would like to have
> more than one IP on my LAN interface (from different subnets). If it
> matters, I'm not doing NAT, I'm just using pfsense as a straight routing
> platform.
Is it possible to
add IP aliases to the LAN interface? I would like to have more than one IP
on my LAN interface (from different subnets). If it matters, I'm not doing
NAT, I'm just using pfsense as a straight routing platform.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric W. Bates wrote:
> alan walters wrote:
>
>>>Ry pinging from the wan in the pfsense gui to the next hop maybe you
>>>have a cable wrong or something else silly that we all do sometimes
>
>
> Thanks for the thot.
> If only that were true...
>
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
alan walters wrote:
> Ry pinging from the wan in the pfsense gui to the next hop maybe you
> have a cable wrong or something else silly that we all do sometimes
Thanks for the thot.
If only that were true...
The pfsense box can ping anything and ever
Ry pinging from the wan in the pfsense gui to the next hop maybe you
have a cable wrong or something else silly that we all do sometimes
-Original Message-
From: Eric W. Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2006 22:31
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] dumb rou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My pfsense box does not seem willing to forward any packets.
Pretty much factory default.
It has a non-routable subnet (10.128.10.1/24) on the LAN, and a legit IP
on the WAN.
I presume NAT is configured; but unless I turn on advanced NAT, I don't
th
We'll need to know exactly the steps taken to reproduce the problem.
I cannot reproduce it here.
On 4/10/06, William Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgrade from this link
>
> http://www.pfsense.org/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-08-2006/pfSense-Full-Update-RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-08-2006.
I upgrade from this link
http://www.pfsense.org/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-08-2006/pfSense-Full-Update-RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-08-2006.tgz
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
William David Armstrong <. Of course it runs
Bio Systems Security.Networking <|===
On 4/10/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I/we just have a /etc/current-supfile with:
>
> *default host=cvs.pfsense.com
> *default base=/root/pfSense
> *default release=cvs
> *default delete use-rel-suffix
> RELENG_1
> *default compress
Already exists. Take a look at how cvs
Can I/we just have a /etc/current-supfile with:
*default host=cvs.pfsense.com
*default base=/root/pfSense
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
RELENG_1
*default compress
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:30 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Please explain how you upgraded from a snapshot?
>
>
Heads up!
Reflection is currently busted in recent snapshots and cvs_sync.sh.
We're looking into the problem now.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please explain how you upgraded from a snapshot?
cvs_sync.sh? If so, did you happen to forget the RELENG_1 portion?
On 4/10/06, William Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgrade direct from snapshot and get this errors
> I create all rules again and get this error
>
> 2006/4/10, Bill
I upgrade direct from snapshot and get this errors
I create all rules again and get this error
2006/4/10, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Haven't seen that one before (and I just upgraded my main box to the
> 4-08 snapshot). What happens if you delete that rule (I assume it's
> not neede
Haven't seen that one before (and I just upgraded my main box to the
4-08 snapshot). What happens if you delete that rule (I assume it's
not needed based on your wording)?
--Bill
On 4/10/06, William Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> phantom rule is inserted on my system config.xml
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
