Sometimes it'S required that you use the Packet mode for the bootloader.
Everytime I had the issue you described checking the packetmode option in the
installer made it boot. Also see our wiki for some more suggestions:
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
Holger
pfSense can't use the pfSense dyndnsupdater in this scenario as it only sees
the internal IP of it's WAN.
There are 3 ways how to resolve this:
1) Let pfSense do the dialin so it is the real WAN and has a real public IP
2) Let the router in front of the pfSense do the dyndns update as it sees the
Here is my original forum post regarding my setup:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=61.0
Nelson Papel
-Original Message-
From: Raja Subramanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 15, 2006 7:57
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense on router with single
Bill already answered this here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=1000.msg5953#msg5953
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 8:54 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Maximum state table size
First of all, thanks for your answer...
I still think that there's a way to make it work also on pfSense, like
on Smoothwall... I've tried also IPCop and it worked really well without
a problem with my DynDNS hosts...
But, anyway, I'm a newbie in scripting and coding and so on... I have no
Jeff,
The appropriate hardware for various connections has been discussed
myriad times on this list and in the FAQ. For your situation a WRAP
would probably handle most things, although the VPN traffic could be a
bit more than the CPU on a WRAP could handle. Certainly you could do
Well, we had recently the pfSense running in a Pentium 200Mhz :-)
We changed now but it was running dmz, vpn, ipsec, traffic shapping,
... to the entire company ;-)
[]'s
On 5/15/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff,
The appropriate hardware for various connections has been
Thanks Holger
I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the past, but google
could not find it.
Interesting it is max 1K per state. I wonder what the factors are that
influence the size.
/peter
On Monday 15 May 2006 20:15, Holger Bauer wrote:
Bill already answered this here:
This...
struct pf_state {
u_int64_tid;
u_int32_tcreatorid;
struct pf_state_host lan;
struct pf_state_host gwy;
struct pf_state_host ext;
sa_family_t af;
u_int8_t proto;
u_int8_t direction;
Jeff,
Assuming you are talking about T1 to internet and want to carry VoIP
in the tunnel, be careful. The main problem is that you must be able
to establish some kind of QOS through that tunnel. I am not sure
that you can prioritize traffic in the tunnel. If you can prioritize
prior to
is it possible to install raqdevil into pfsense?
http://www.raqdevil.com/
so we can have full hosting platform on a (yes it's become somewhat
less) secure firewall?
rgds,
dny
--
--- http://bloglines.com/public/bacaan --- harini udah baca blom?
... they look but do not see and hear but do not
What's next? Frozen bubble on pfsense?
--
Warm regards,
Kevin
Key fingerprint : 4B23 FC1C E50B 9693 CCDD 2A7D A048 E909 8924 9BDD
Public key :
http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xA048E90989249BDD
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 12:50, dny wrote:
is it possible to install raqdevil
12 matches
Mail list logo
