[pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
what does the error: LAN sis0 interface mismatch -- Running interface assignement option mean? I get this error when i reboot our pfsense router?

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Jack Pivac
Sounds like you need to assign which interfaces you want to be WAN and LAN etc.. Is this the first time you are running PFSense? on 23/06/06 18:02 Tunge2 said the following: what does the error: LAN sis0 interface mismatch -- Running interface assignement option mean? I get this error

RE: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Holger Bauer
It means there is an Interface assigned to LAN in your config.xml which is not present in your machine anymore. For example the config.xml has rl3 for LAN but there is no rl3 interface detected at bootup. It asks for interface reassignment to make your configfile have valid information again.

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
no. I've updatedthe pfsense machine yesterday with cvs-update? i have to reconfigure/re-assin the interfaces every time i reboot our PFsense machine. Version 1.0-RC1a built on Fri Jun 16 01:04:23 UTC 2006 2006/6/23, Jack Pivac [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sounds like you need to assign which

Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
is this command/function echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward default enabled in pfsense (RC1)? or do i have toenableit manually (how can i do this because /proc doesn't existed?) Van: Tunge2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 21 juni 2006 17:48 Aan:

[pfSense Support] Disconnections on VPN tunnel with CISCO

2006-06-23 Thread Alvaro Pietrobono
HI, I have made a VPN from Cisco VPN Concentrator toPfSense and all works fine, but when connection on Cisco side go down for any reason the tunnel don't succeed to establish a new one. From cisco side all seems ok but pfsense log same errors: racoon: INFO: request for establishing IPsec-SA

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Rainer Duffner
Tunge2 schrieb: is this command/function *echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward *default enabled in pfsense (RC1)? or do i have to enable it manually (how can i do this because /proc doesn't existed?) FreeBSD ain't Linux. pfSense = FreeBSD. I think FreeBSD6 has abandoned procfs. It's

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
I get another error at the console: Route: writing to routing socket: no such process. this is wen i select option 1) Assign Interfaces and then 'a' for auto.detection to re-assign the interface. when i do it manually the error disappears, and the wan interface is working great until the next

[pfSense Support] Squid and HAVP

2006-06-23 Thread Quirino Santilli
Dear Sirs, I'm having many problems with Squid and HAVP packages. I don't know if this the right place to ask for support but I'll try. The first one (squid) stop on every configuration change and I have to reboot the pfsense machine to bring it back up. Furthermore I'am quite sure that it

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
Does PFsenssay for example, routebetween a tun0and atun1interface? or do i need the ip_forward trick or do i need something else? why did you say edFreeBSD6 has abandoned procfs.It's considered evil, IIRC. 2006/6/23, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tunge2 schrieb: is this command/function *echo

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Alvaro Pietrobono
You can verify this: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding if is 1 forwarding between every interface is enable, if 0 not. ~Alvaro - Original Message - From: Tunge2 To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:57 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD

RE: [pfSense Support] Disconnections on VPN tunnel with CISCO

2006-06-23 Thread Holger Bauer
Try prefer older IPSEC SA at systemadvanced. Disable and enable IPSEC at the pfSense end to make sure the new settings are applied. Does disabling and enabling IPSEC at the pfSense solve the issue if the cisco can't connect? From the logs it looks like the cisco doesn't answer to the connection

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwardingnet.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 so that 1 2006/6/23, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You can verify this: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding if is 1 forwarding between every interface is enable, if 0 not. ~Alvaro - Original Message - From: Tunge2 To:

Re: [pfSense Support] Squid and HAVP

2006-06-23 Thread Rajkumar S
Quirino Santilli wrote: The second one (HAVP) when browsing SSL protected pages gives back a web page saying: 'invalid request'. I know that the SSL web traffic is cyphered but how can I solve the problem? As far as I know HAVP does not support SSL traffic. So may be you should try not to use

Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Alvaro Pietrobono
If you config Vpn tunnell site-to-site with openvpn you can route everithing adding static routes for lan interface and in field "gateway" puttingthe IP of the other peer. I tring some configuration and the behavor is that expected (I using openvpn as vpn backup). The problem however is

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/23/06, Tunge2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get another error at the console : Route: writing to routing socket: no such process. this is wen i select option 1) Assign Interfaces and then 'a' for auto.detection to re-assign the interface. when i do it manually the error disappears, and the

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
sorry sorry it's a live cd-rom installed on a hard disk 2006/6/23, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/23/06, Tunge2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get another error at the console : Route: writing to routing socket: no such process. this is wen i select option 1)Assign Interfaces and then 'a' for

Re: [pfSense Support] LAN sis0 interface mismatch

2006-06-23 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/23/06, Tunge2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry sorry it's a live cd-rom installed on a hard disk This doesn't make much sense. After the machine is up and running take a look at /cf/conf/config.xml and make sure that your interfaces have changed from sis0, etc. Sounds like you need to

[pfSense Support] Transcend IDE Flash drives

2006-06-23 Thread Ebay
My Cheap CF Card I was using to kida test PFSense just Died. No fault to anything except that I used cheap hardware. I am looking at spending a little bit more money to get a transcend card to install it on. I just wanted to see if anyone out there is using the Transcend Flash drives and if so,

Re: [pfSense Support] What happens if the soekris hardware is defective upon arrival? The Cortex Systems way.

2006-06-23 Thread Dan Bond
Might I be the first to recommend https://kd85.com/soekris.html for all of your Soekris needs, am just a satisfied customer but thought it work mentioning. When I recieved my Soekris there was a scratch on the case. Sent a photo of this to them, got an answer straight back, they sent out a new

[pfSense Support] Startup sound on FX5620 in slow-mo

2006-06-23 Thread Josh Stompro
When I boot up a FX5620 with 1.0-RC1a embedded on a compact flash card, the startup chimes are played in slow motion and take about 10 seconds to play. When I installed it on a regular PC a while back the startup sound was much quicker. Can anyone else with an FX5620 confirm that they see

Re: [pfSense Support] Startup sound on FX5620 in slow-mo

2006-06-23 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/23/06, Josh Stompro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I boot up a FX5620 with 1.0-RC1a embedded on a compact flash card, the startup chimes are played in slow motion and take about 10 seconds to play. When I installed it on a regular PC a while back the startup sound was much quicker. Can

Re: [pfSense Support] Startup sound on FX5620 in slow-mo

2006-06-23 Thread Chris Buechler
Josh Stompro wrote: When I boot up a FX5620 with 1.0-RC1a embedded on a compact flash card If the clock isn't an issue, from what I've experienced, having the sounds play substantially longer with CF is normal. all my embedded hardware drags the sound out much, much longer than my hard

Re: [pfSense Support] Startup sound on FX5620 in slow-mo

2006-06-23 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/23/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the clock isn't an issue, from what I've experienced, having the sounds play substantially longer with CF is normal. all my embedded hardware drags the sound out much, much longer than my hard drive installs. I believe there was a post

RE: [pfSense Support] Disconnections on VPN tunnel with CISCO

2006-06-23 Thread Brian Neufeld
Please forgive the ignorant question, but one would put a private address from the other side of the VPN in the keep alive field, correct? ~Brian -Original Message- From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 7:01 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject:

Re: [pfSense Support] Disconnections on VPN tunnel with CISCO

2006-06-23 Thread Brad Bendy
I set mine to ping the private IP of the other firewall, make sure ICMP is enabled though!!! On Friday 23 June 2006 10:21, Brian Neufeld wrote: Please forgive the ignorant question, but one would put a private address from the other side of the VPN in the keep alive field, correct? ~Brian

Re: [pfSense Support] What happens if the soekris hardware is defective upon arrival? The Cortex Systems way.

2006-06-23 Thread Eric Masson
Dan Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Might I be the first to recommend https://kd85.com/soekris.html for all of your Soekris needs, am just a satisfied customer Wim is clearly a really serious soekris reseller for Europe, never heard any complaint about kd85, one of my friends has around

Re: [pfSense Support] Transcend IDE Flash drives

2006-06-23 Thread Bill Marquette
On 6/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My Cheap CF Card I was using to kida test PFSense just Died. No fault to anything except that I used cheap hardware. I am looking at spending a little bit more money to get a transcend card to install it on. I just wanted to see if anyone

RE: [pfSense Support] Transcend IDE Flash drives

2006-06-23 Thread Ryan L. Rodrigue
Thanks for the reply. Anyone use the 512 meg or larger? thats what i was leaning toward. I'd like to go larger so I have plenty of room to change my mind. -Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:02 PM To: support@pfsense.com

RE: [pfSense Support] Transcend IDE Flash drives

2006-06-23 Thread Ryan L. Rodrigue
Thanks for the reply. Anyone use the 512 meg or larger? thats what i was leaning toward. I'd like to go larger so I have plenty of room to change my mind. -Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:02 PM To: support@pfsense.com

Re: [pfSense Support] What happens if the soekris hardware is defective upon arrival? The Cortex Systems way.

2006-06-23 Thread Dave Warren
Jonathan Gonzalez wrote: I did a bank transfer for a soekris net4801-60 (256MB RAM) and other elements. When it arrived the hardware only recognizes 128MB of RAM. Can you reverse a bank transfer (like a charge back on a credit card?) -- If so, do it, send the box back COD (for the shipping

Re: [pfSense Support] What happens if the soekris hardware is defective upon arrival? The Cortex Systems way.

2006-06-23 Thread Frederick Page
Hi Eric, Eric Masson wrote on Fri, Jun 23 2006: Might I be the first to recommend https://kd85.com/soekris.html for all of your Soekris needs, am just a satisfied customer Wim is clearly a really serious soekris reseller for Europe, never heard any complaint about kd85, one of my friends has