Hi!
Please, excuse me my bad english and also, if the topic was covered here.
I have a fibre connection that is the GW, with and IP 213.1.2.145 (all
IP's aren't reals). Then a machine with 3 eth:
1-MACHINE:
xl0 - LAN 192.168.1.1 (admin only).
xl1 - WAN 212.1.2.41 gw fixed with 213.1.2.146
xl2 -
Hi,
When you say you've deactivated the firewall rules what do you exactly
mean? I would suggest :
* use ACCEPT ALL rules (ANY to ANY) on your interfaces
* remove the BLOCK Private Addresses feature on the WAN interface
This should allow PFSENSE to work as a router. You will probably
Joseph Favia Jr. escribió:
Hi,
When you say you've deactivated the firewall rules what do you exactly
mean? I would suggest :
* use ACCEPT ALL rules (ANY to ANY) on your interfaces
This is one.
* remove the BLOCK Private Addresses feature on the WAN interface
This I can't remove
Scott Ullrich wrote:
I cannot reproduce this one. I would say something in your XML is
nice and hosed. If you ever accidentally updated to -HEAD then this
is surely part of it.
Scott
On 2/10/07, William Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
upgrade that thing to one of the new snapshots and try and see if it happens
still. snapshots seem more stable than even the 1.0.1 release.
-Sean Cavanaugh
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:25:20 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] error on backup
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
upgrade that thing to one of the new snapshots and try and see if it
happens still. snapshots seem more stable than even the 1.0.1 release.
Of course will do.
Though the problem discussed here was not my panic (which I'm pretty
sure recent relases/snapshots has solved),
Joseph Favia Jr. escribió:
Hi Manuel,
Sorry, I was speaking in general terms regarding the static routes; you
don't
need it to ping the machines on the same network :-) , unless the first
machine
was presenting itself with the 192.168.x.y address (your machines had two
addresses,
Okay now this is making more sense. I have had the backup cache go
nuts on me as well so there is defiantly a bug lurking somewhere in
there.
Scott
On 2/13/07, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
upgrade that thing to one of the new snapshots and try and see if it
Hello Team / Supporters,
i have a very wired problem with pfsense.
Please take some time to read the complete mail.
Infrastructure
4Mbit ADSL Connection / ADSL Modem / no other Internet Infrastructure
Problem description:
===
30% of the Internet seams to be not available. Part
On 2/13/07, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Team / Supporters,
i have a very wired problem with pfsense.
Please take some time to read the complete mail.
Infrastructure
4Mbit ADSL Connection / ADSL Modem / no other Internet Infrastructure
Problem description:
===
30%
Hello,
I have 2 OpenVPN tunnels coming into a box here at our office. The problem
I'm having is that after a reboot and when OpenVPN starts backup, it shows
in the logs that a tunnel established but I get this error:
Feb 13 10:28:13 openvpn[277]: WARNING: file
'/var/etc/openvpn_server0.secret'
Update to a recent snapshot.
On 2/13/07, kevin hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 OpenVPN tunnels coming into a box here at our office. The
problem I'm having is that after a reboot and when OpenVPN starts backup, it
shows in the logs that a tunnel established but I get this
Hello,
i have a question about updating.
One of my Firewalls run's with 1.0-SNAPSHOT-x,
is there any Problem with upgrading this, using
the update-tgz for Version 1.0.1. or better next days 1.0.2?
Or should i better backup and reinstall
this Firewall?
Thanks
regards
michael
--
On 2/13/07, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i have a question about updating.
One of my Firewalls run's with 1.0-SNAPSHOT-x,
is there any Problem with upgrading this, using
the update-tgz for Version 1.0.1. or better next days 1.0.2?
Or should i better backup and reinstall
Hi Scott,
ok i will try that next days.
Is there an other (newer) place for actual snapshots then
www.pfsense.com/~sullrich ?or exists only the main Updates from
the update-section in Downloadpage.
I remember me that i have prior downloaded snapshots
from the link above.
or we talk from
On 2/13/07, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
ok i will try that next days.
Is there an other (newer) place for actual snapshots then
www.pfsense.com/~sullrich ?or exists only the main Updates from
the update-section in Downloadpage.
I remember me that i have prior downloaded
Ahhh, i be out of date :-)
thank you
cu
michael
2007/2/13, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/13/07, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
ok i will try that next days.
Is there an other (newer) place for actual snapshots then
www.pfsense.com/~sullrich ?or exists only
Version *1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-02-08-2007 *
built on Fri Feb 9 09:18:39 EST 2007
On 2/13/07, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update to a recent snapshot.
On 2/13/07, kevin hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 OpenVPN tunnels coming into a box here at our office. The
problem
You should be fine in upgrading from 1.0.1 to a recent snapshot.
Scott
PS: just so nobody is confused, 1.0.2 is not out yet.
I wondered if I missed something or if I was just confused again! ;)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I have a network (172.1.1.0/24) on an interface, em0 (10.20.100.0/24)
that I need to be able to route to a different interface, em2
(10.10.100.0/24). I got this working with Shorewall on Linux by adding a
static route for 172.1.1.0/24 to 10.20.100.1 (IP of em0). However, when
I try it on
Ok, I think I found a way around it. All I have to do is specify
-iface to the route command line arguments. I can then (from
172.1.1.2) ping 10.10.100.x:
route add 172.1.1/24 10.20.100.1 -iface
Is there any way we can add the various flags to the webgui static route
page? Even if we have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking for a basic pfsense/OLSR how to? Anyone who has done this
able to point me to their blog or some such?
I realize there should probably be info on olsr.org; but there is quite
a bit of info about implementation of the protocol and the more
All of your questions have been addressed on the forum. Please search
the forum.
Thanks!
On 2/13/07, Eric W. Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking for a basic pfsense/OLSR how to? Anyone who has done this
able to point me to their blog or
Did recent snapshot solve the php problem?
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schuh
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Updating from 1.0 - 1.0.2
Ahhh, i be out of date :-)
thank you
cu
michael
Greetings list,
I remember reading something on the list a few weeks ago to the effect that
enabling traffic shaping on a load balanced setup causes all sorts of
problems.
I gave it a try myself this evening briefly, and although it appeared things
were being dropped into the correct queues,
25 matches
Mail list logo
