Email just sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the captive portal changes.
I also emailed some freeradius package changes to coreteam back on 3/19.
Were those committed?
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sund
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If I made the modifications to display the mac/client IP on the
"default" captive portal page, would you commit it and make it the
default captive portal page? I would just throw a couple of lines right
beneath the login button that say:
Client MAC: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Andy Dills wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Nope, that's what has me confused. This
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
>
> That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Nope, that's what has me confused. This is all 100mbit, all standard MTUs
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Eric Baenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VPN connections from each lab to the core are OpenVPN, UDP, shared key,
> AES 128bit (for now), LZO compression enabled.
> As I said before - all is working fine - except: when doing rsync's over
> ssh/scp from the lab
On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > Anybody else experience this or have any theories?
>
> I wonder if this is it?
>
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=20798
>
> I went ahead and patched my filter.inc to see if that corrects the issue.
N
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
> Anybody else experience this or have any theories?
I wonder if this is it?
http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=20798
I went ahead and patched my filter.inc to see if that corrects the issue.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-997
Hi there,
I've got a couple of HL-463 boxes that I've been trying out. They both
came with pfsense 1.2-RC4 installed. They work well for the most part,
however, I have found a reproducable flaw that makes them very crippled.
Hopefully it's resolvable, and I doubt it was fixed in between RC4 an
I had a similar setup, eg. using the onboard NIC and another PCI NIC in
the machine...
They weren't gbits, but plain 100mbits...
Well, performance was dull... it simply did not perform like a 100mbit
card... as soon as I added a second NIC (the same as the other one),
performance was exactly o
10 matches
Mail list logo