et al,
So I was inspired to dig into the newest Alpha2X
1.3 today and fired
up the VM and was pleasantly greeted w/ an XML
error:
"XML error: no pfSense object found!"
Any thoughts anyone???
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
Thank you for your help!
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buechler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:40:49 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Recent
Tim Nelson wrote:
Sorry, I think I misread your response to my original post which you misread...
;-)
I am not concerned about the "multiple local devices PPTP out to the same remote PPTP
server" scenario. I was really just asking if the "devices can PPTP outbound when the
local PPTP server i
Sorry, I think I misread your response to my original post which you misread...
;-)
I am not concerned about the "multiple local devices PPTP out to the same
remote PPTP server" scenario. I was really just asking if the "devices can PPTP
outbound when the local PPTP server is enabled" situation
Tim Nelson wrote:
I've done quite a bit of testing and the end result is always the same.
I understand very well what the issue is in 1.2, I wrote what you
quoted. ;)
What I was asking is you were talking like the issue with many clients
to one server is no longer an issue in 1.2.1, is that
I've done quite a bit of testing and the end result is always the same. If the
PPTP server is enabled locally on the premise edge router/firewall, local
clients cannot connect to remote PPTP servers at all. As soon as the PPTP
server is disabled, connectivity works exactly as expected. I made so
Michel Servaes wrote:
I guess this will be my last question on Alix...
I have bought myself a CF HDD (8GB) (some months ago), and tried to
install it on a regular mainboard... but FreeBSD does not seem to like
this kind of setup... as a result, it won't boot up when using an
ATA/CF convertor.
Tim Nelson wrote:
Recent updates to PPTP allow multiple local clients to connect to the same
remote PPTP server. However, do these updates fix the issue between PPTP and
NAT where if you have a local PPTP server enabled, you cannot use PPTP outbound
to remote PPTP sites?
Last I heard that
Recent updates to PPTP allow multiple local clients to connect to the same
remote PPTP server. However, do these updates fix the issue between PPTP and
NAT where if you have a local PPTP server enabled, you cannot use PPTP outbound
to remote PPTP sites?
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbo
Multiple incoming should already work
the issue is connecting multiple
internal devices to the same external pptp server.
1.2.1 is supposed to have addressed that issue to, so if thats what you
meant then try it out. As written, it should already be working.
-Tim
From: Samer Chaer [mailto
Forgot to ask you...have you tried installing Pfsense on this PC/Server
using an ATA Hard drive?
you should test that, in order to agree there isn' any issue with your ATA
controller in FreeBSD
by the way,
the same embeded install directions goes for alix/soekeris devices, so if
you tested in a nor
When you enter your mainboard BIOS and is the CF card detected?
I have a 4gb and cf/ata converter plugged in my old PIII Dell and it works
without any issue, is your PC/Server an old one or maybe not so old?
Have you done this setup using physdiskwrite-0.5.1? Perhaps you are
installing using the
Hi,
I am using Pfsense 1.2 as a pptp server. do you suggest an upgrade to 1.2.1
latest snapshot sor multiple simultaneous PPTP incoming connections can
work?
thanks,
Sam.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:42 AM, DLStrout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though this is a great idea (to test on 1.3) I/we aren't ready to put a 1.3
> alpha2x box into production at this site, and have had several scaving
> emails this morning at the suggestion from me to do so (ah ha ha, -- go
> fig
Though this is a great idea (to test on 1.3) I/we
aren't ready to
put a 1.3 alpha2x box into production at this
site, and have had
several scaving emails this morning at the
suggestion from me to do
so (ah ha ha, -- go figure). I have had some
issues getting 1.3 to
run in a VMware enviro
How should I implement PPPoE on my WAN side ?
I have some old SIP phones, that have PPPoE functionality... and I want
them to work at distance without having to buy a VPN capable router...
I can enable PPPoE on pfSense, and I can select WAN as incoming... but
how should I configure this, witho
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:19 AM, DLStrout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been tinkering w/ the Shrew Soft VPN client and was wondering if
> there is anyway (maybe I'm missing it) to setup IPsec clients to be "dhcp
> over IPsec" or "IKE config pull/push" clients? I see in the Shrew docs that
>
I have been tinkering w/ the Shrew Soft VPN
client and was wondering
if there is anyway (maybe I'm missing it) to setup
IPsec clients to be
"dhcp over IPsec" or "IKE config pull/push"
clients? I see in the
Shrew docs that this method is supported by the
client, but I don't
see any option
I guess this will be my last question on Alix...
I have bought myself a CF HDD (8GB) (some months ago), and tried to
install it on a regular mainboard... but FreeBSD does not seem to like
this kind of setup... as a result, it won't boot up when using an ATA/CF
convertor... tried with an extern
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to
> give understanding to the problem...
>
> Untangle, while in bridged mode still really needs its own IP since one
> of its primary features is to s
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:42 AM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how is your network setup?
>
> <1> PC ---switch UT ---pfsense
>
> or
>
> <2> PC ---switch ---pfsense UT
>
> I would suggest trying <2> since you just want the CP on pfsense
>
UT recomends always to be between user and
As RB would say... I'm not contributing to the answer, but helping to
give understanding to the problem...
Untangle, while in bridged mode still really needs its own IP since one
of its primary features is to send daily reports as well as to provide
access to quarantined emails. This makes it dif
22 matches
Mail list logo
