Hello
Searched through the list and found many posts on VLAN. To my knowledge
I have done what I think is correct but packages wont go through. I can
see in the pfSense logs that packages do get in on the right VLAN
interface but that's about it.
bge0 is WAN
bge1 is LAN
I have defined two
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, BSD Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.2 is it possible to connect to pfsense boxes on the same subnet via
an ipsec tunnel? Both boxes wan interfaces are private ip's.
No, need different subnets.
Scott
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:59 PM, BSD Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear, both boxes lans are different subnet of course but the WANs are
on the same subnets.
That might work. Give it a shot.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe,
What version of pfSense are you running? 1.2-Release? 1.2.1-RC?
Fredrik Rambris wrote:
Hello
Searched through the list and found many posts on VLAN. To my
knowledge I have done what I think is correct but packages wont go
through. I can see in the pfSense logs that packages do get in on the
Hello Gary,
On C3550 Fa0/1 try switchport trunk allowed vlan 201,202 . Then see
the output sh interfaces trunk . You should see if the Fa0/1 is
trunking correctly with dot1Q encapsulation.
Cheers,
- Matej
Gary Buckmaster wrote / napísal(a):
What version of pfSense are you running?
So your saying that the wan interfaces on the boxes need diff subnets?
-Phil G
On Oct 14, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, BSD Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.2 is it possible to connect to pfsense boxes on the same
subnet
look closely... switchport mode access command is absent
I use this way... and works ok.
interface fastethernet 0/x
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan
Regards
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Matej Duracka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Gary,
On C3550 Fa0/1 try
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:59 PM, BSD Wiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear, both boxes lans are different subnet of course but the WANs are
on the same subnets.
If they're on the same ISP with privately addressed WANs that will
work, if they allow routing between customers. If it's two
it's on my corporate network, both wan interfaces of the pfsense box
are on the same private ip subnet. we built 2 labs using pfsense and
now we want to connect the two labs. i haven't had any luck getting
them to work yet...
the reason i've asked the question is because i have several site
Is there a particular reason you need this traffic to be encapsulated?
At first blush, this would seem to be a pretty standard routing problem,
easily solvable with static routes. Unless there's some very specific
reason for needing the encryption.
-Gary
BSD Wiz wrote:
it's on my corporate
yes, there are reasons and it must be encrypted.
thanks,
-phil
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Is there a particular reason you need this traffic to be
encapsulated? At first blush, this would seem to be a pretty
standard routing problem, easily solvable with
11 matches
Mail list logo
