Re: [pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:15 PM, David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Rees wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:24 PM, David Rees wrote: I just commented on http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1859,4 with a

Re: [pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:15 PM, David Rees wrote: > > It's not a complete fix, anyway. It actually breaks that other ticket. > :-( I'll look at it more when I get a chance. > That's exactly what I was afraid of, it would break something else. :) We're confident in the fixes that are coming. ch

Re: [pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:24 PM, David Rees wrote: >>> I just commented on http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1859,4 with >>> a fix. Hopefully this can sneak into 1.2.2 after the fix i

Re: [pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:24 PM, David Rees wrote: >> I just commented on http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1859,4 with >> a fix. Hopefully this can sneak into 1.2.2 after the fix is confirmed. > > It was already built, but it was built

Re: [pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:24 PM, David Rees wrote: > I just commented on http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1859,4 with > a fix. Hopefully this can sneak into 1.2.2 after the fix is confirmed. > It was already built, but it was built literally minutes before today's FreeBSD security advisories

[pfSense Support] Couple OpenNTPd Ticket Comments & Fix

I just commented on http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1859,4 with a fix. Hopefully this can sneak into 1.2.2 after the fix is confirmed. Also, Ticket http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1617,36 appears to be fixed in 1.2.1 (which I also commented on) -Dave -

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: > They aren't major, aside from the setup wizard issue they're rare edge > cases or minor things. PPTP isn't one. *shrug* commenting based on what I've seen about the place, admittedly I haven't actually read the changelog... ---

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Morgan Reed wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Iarocci > wrote: >> I have a single WAN setup and PPTP has been broken since I upgraded to >> 1.2.1. In version 1.2 it worked perfectly. I've tried changing settings >> and putting them back, but

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Iarocci wrote: > I have a single WAN setup and PPTP has been broken since I upgraded to > 1.2.1. In version 1.2 it worked perfectly. I've tried changing settings > and putting them back, but it continues to fail at the authentication > process as you'

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Christopher Iarocci wrote: > 173.2.245.101 > 173.* doesn't exist in the bogons file. > Upon going to diagnostics-->ping, I put in google.com as the host and it > resolved and returned pings. I believe my firewall can access the internet. > I can say that I disco

RE: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

173.2.245.101 Upon going to diagnostics-->ping, I put in google.com as the host and it resolved and returned pings. I believe my firewall can access the internet. I can say that I discovered the problem about 12 hours after the firewall was up and running. I'm not sure if that was enough time fo

RE: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

I have a single WAN setup and PPTP has been broken since I upgraded to 1.2.1. In version 1.2 it worked perfectly. I've tried changing settings and putting them back, but it continues to fail at the authentication process as you've described. I have the same setup as you, a W2K3 server acting as

Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Atkins, Dwane P wrote: > Is the 1.2.2 going to be a full release or is it RC1? > Full release, only 4 changes. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-

Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:10:04PM -0600, Atkins, Dwane P wrote: > And while I am on the upgrade subject, does the list recommend a > complete reinstall, using the LiveCD or a upgrade using the pfSense GUI? I was able to upgrade even from embedded, via the unsupported route (changing /etc/platform

RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

1.2.1-RC2 built on Wed Nov 19 22:22:11 EST 2008 Dwane -Original Message- From: Atkins, Dwane P [mailto:atki...@uthscsa.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:39 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help On the 1.2.1 upgrade is there specific har

RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

I am sorry. I am running 1.2.1 RC2 Dwane -Original Message- From: Atkins, Dwane P [mailto:atki...@uthscsa.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:39 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help On the 1.2.1 upgrade is there specific hardware require

RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

On the 1.2.1 upgrade is there specific hardware requirements? What is the recommended hardware requirement? Did I miss that in my readings? -Original Message- From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@rockbochs.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:25 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re:

Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

I'm not sure about an RC installation but when 1.2.1 was recently released, I simply did an upgrade with no problems at all from 1.2. The system rebooted and all services came online as expected, except slightly faster IIRC. :-) Before upgrading, make sure you download a backup of your config fi

RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

And while I am on the upgrade subject, does the list recommend a complete reinstall, using the LiveCD or a upgrade using the pfSense GUI? -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:g...@centipedenetworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subj

RE: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

Is the 1.2.2 going to be a full release or is it RC1? -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:g...@centipedenetworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help Is there a reason you haven't upgra

Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

Is there a reason you haven't upgraded? Especially since 1.2 was released well over a year ago, and now 1.2.1 is up with increased support. Before chasing down issues down rabbit holes, I would encourage you to consider upgrading, especially when 1.2.2 is released here in the next few days.

Re: [pfSense Support] Really need some help

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:07, Atkins, Dwane P wrote: > We have 1.2 RC2 installed on a Dell server. Periodically, it locks up > solid. You can web into it, but when you go to see how many users there are > on the Captive Portal, it locks up. It will show you the number of users > but will not di

[pfSense Support] Really need some help

We have 1.2 RC2 installed on a Dell server. Periodically, it locks up solid. You can web into it, but when you go to see how many users there are on the Captive Portal, it locks up. It will show you the number of users but will not display the list. Can I look for a log somewhere that will

Re: [pfSense Support] DMZ to LAN access

Peter Todorov wrote: Hello, I have a LAN that have 192.168.2.0/24 and DMZ (second LAN) with 192.168.4.0/24 How can I access LAN from DMZ? pfsense 1.2 - dual WAN configuration. Thank you in advance for answers. -- честността не е порок Typically

[pfSense Support] DMZ to LAN access

Hello, I have a LAN that have 192.168.2.0/24 and DMZ (second LAN) with 192.168.4.0/24 How can I access LAN from DMZ? pfsense 1.2 - dual WAN configuration. Thank you in advance for answers. -- честността не е порок

Re: [pfSense Support] Secondary IP range for WAN & LAN

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:34 AM, bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have requested and obtained from my hosting company an new range of public > IPs. > > How can I configure PFSense to use these knowing that they will be routed on > the same physical cable as my previous IPs (WAN if) ? > > > In other word t

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Christopher Iarocci wrote: > I found that the bogon networks in 1.2.1 include at least one legit network. > I found out the hard way when one of my VPN tunnels wouldn't establish and > it drove me crazy for hours. Turned out unclicking the bogon network option > fi

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > > Ok, I have one additional bug (at least I'm considering that as bug). When > creating port forwarding and also adding automatically apporpriate firewall > rules and then deleting that port forward rule, the firewall rules are not > deleted. I s

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

Christopher Iarocci wrote: > I found that the bogon networks in 1.2.1 include at least one legit network. > I found out the hard way when one of my VPN tunnels wouldn't establish and > it drove me crazy for hours. Turned out unclicking the bogon network option > fixed it. After realizing that tha

[pfSense Support] Secondary IP range for WAN & LAN

Hello, I have requested and obtained from my hosting company an new range of public IPs. How can I configure PFSense to use these knowing that they will be routed on the same physical cable as my previous IPs (WAN if) ? In other word the WAN Interface will have to have two IPs… and my

[pfSense Support] Captive portal not cutting off on date specified

I'm finding that the pfSense 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 captive portal, using 'Local user manager', isn't always cutting people off when they reach their expiry date. I've tested it with my own account and was cut off, yet I see others not being cut off. I have idle timeout and hard timeout not set. I set a

[pfSense Support] Dual WAN failover not working

Hi! I have dual pfsense 1.2.1, LAN interface, WAN and OPT1, last two are different ISP's. I have configured 3 carp interfaces and gateway failover for load balancer. I only need failover, not load balancing. Tried with one and two failover pools with no success. When WAN isp is disconnected,

RE: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

I found that the bogon networks in 1.2.1 include at least one legit network. I found out the hard way when one of my VPN tunnels wouldn't establish and it drove me crazy for hours. Turned out unclicking the bogon network option fixed it. After realizing that that particular network couldn't commu

Re: [pfSense Support] Zabbix Agent package on 1.2.1

Rainer Duffner wrote: > From what I could see, once you install the agent, Zabbix was able to > figure out most of the services by itself. > This is especially true for disks, CPU-load, memory and interfaces that > are IMO quite timeconsuming to setup in Nagios. I quite liked munin for that; I use

[pfSense Support] mail archives

http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66&Itemid=71 the link to mail-archive doesn't work for the support or discussion lists moreover, if you enable javascript on the mail-archive site it gives and XSS danger warning! ---

Re: [pfSense Support] Zabbix Agent package on 1.2.1

Hi folks, Still one day behind (jet lag from Paris, France)… Anyway I am using Zabbix in production on FreeBSD Servers (6.3p7 - 6.4p1 - 7.0p7) since a couple of month… and I have a very precise overview of what's working and what's broken. The main problem with zabbix (server and client)

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 wizard bug

Chris Buechler wrote: Yeah, 1.2.2 is coming sometime this week to fix that and 3 other things that have been fixed since 1.2.1. Ok, I have one additional bug (at least I'm considering that as bug). When creating port forwarding and also adding automatically apporpriate firewall rules and then