I am experiencing the same issue at my side...i have 3mbit symmetric and i
had set UP/Down to 200kbit...in the start every thing was stopped...i used
tcpdump on my LAN side but my Pfsense was not listening to anything...then a
reboot fixed it but the problem mentioned by -Jeppe- remains same...i
Hello
Is pfsync better than contrackd?
In what aspects?
--
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Go troll elsewhere.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mikel Jimenez mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello
Is pfsync better than contrackd?
Who cares, pfsense runs on FreeBSD where there be demons, not penguins.
In what aspects?
It runs on *BSD, not linux, so yes, infinitely better.
--Bill
More tecnically reason?
Referring to states, tracking, tcp/udp...
Bill Marquette wrote:
Go troll elsewhere.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mikel Jimenez mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello
Is pfsync better than contrackd?
Who cares, pfsense runs on FreeBSD where there be demons, not
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Mikel Jimenez mi...@irontec.com wrote:
More tecnically reason?
Referring to states, tracking, tcp/udp...
There's a reason you aren't getting the responses you want on the
OpenBSD list where you asked the exact same question and here. For
one, you're not likely
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:06, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
For one, you're not likely to find any Linux users here, at least not any
that are intimately familiar with Linux firewalls.
Preferring to hand-roll my own rule sets and knowing the iptables
packet stack nearly by heart, I'd
icmp
192.168.10.255:54864 - 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:54864 - 192.168.10.255
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.255:60489 - 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:60489
Has anyone bridged interfaces in embedded pfSense? I was wondering if
support for bridging is compiled in the kernel.
I am running an Alix 2d3 board, and I can't run snort locally. Being
too cheap and lazy to purchase or build a tap, I'd like to bridge the
external interface to the unused
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:30, apiase...@midatlanticbb.com
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
icmp 192.168.10.255:54864 - 192.168.10.11 0:0
icmp 192.168.10.11:54864 - 192.168.10.255 0:0
icmp 192.168.10.255:60489 - 192.168.10.11 0:0
icmp 192.168.10.11:60489 - 192.168.10.255 0:0
snip
I've
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Larry Sampas la...@larrysampas.com wrote:
Has anyone bridged interfaces in embedded pfSense? I was wondering if
support for bridging is compiled in the kernel.
Yes.
I am running an Alix 2d3 board, and I can't run snort locally. Being
too cheap and lazy to
agree, this is not a linux mailing list.
however, linux users might find the following script useful:
http://www.zaurus.org.uk/download/scripts/nf_conntrack
it gives you a useful overview of the (nat) states. I wrote it when I
couldn't find anything similar and was trying to work out how a
I know, I know stupid question.
Is the default gateway the WAN address? If not, where is it located?
Thanks,
-M
Marty Nelson wrote:
I know, I know stupid question.
Is the default gateway the WAN address? If not, where is it located?
Thanks,
-M
The default gateway is the default route for traffic on that network
segment to reach all remote network segments not otherwise specified in
I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
daemon, not kernel level.
My question is, it can do all that pfsync?
If yo dont
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:26 PM, mikel mi...@irontec.com wrote:
I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
daemon, not kernel level.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, mikel mi...@irontec.com wrote:
I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
daemon, not kernel
Yeah!!
This is a very good reason!!
I think that contrackd doenst does this
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0600, Bill Marquette
bill.marque...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, mikel mi...@irontec.com wrote:
I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD,
Slicing and dicing to get context:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26, mikel mi...@irontec.com wrote:
I think that contrackd doenst does this
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0600, Bill Marquette bill.marque...@gmail.com
wrote:
All 255 protocols. If it's in state, it's sync'd.
At the expense of
Chris, yes that helped out tremendously and made sense to me all at the same
time!
I added static routes for all of the subnets that the router does not sit on,
with their gateways being their router interface.
Thanks again so much for your help.
-Marty
From: Curtis LaMasters
Are you saying that once you rebooted, the shaper worked as expected with
the 200 kbit limit?
Regards,
-Jeppe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Abdulrehman arvagabo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am experiencing the same issue at my side...i have 3mbit symmetric and i
had set UP/Down to 200kbit...in the
Hey everyone!
I was curious if anyone had successfully gotten APCUPSD up and running on a
PFSense box? I'm running 1.2.3 (and it's awesome by the way :) ) The reason I
want to go with APCUPSD and not the NUT package is because my UPS is also
powering a couple of other devices and I have
Hi,
I have dual router configuration, 1 lan, 3 wan, 2 isp-s. port 25 is
forwarded to email server in lan network. Default route is wan1. When i
try to telnet from lan to wan2 port 25, i get no connection, but i can
ping wan2 from lan. Telnet to wan1 and wan2 from outside works perfectly.
22 matches
Mail list logo
