Tim,
See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=15669 if you have issues with
the Firebox. I'm collecting as much data as I can from those that are having
issues.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@f
You don't *have* to have two subnets, you can bridge OpenVPN, but it's
a bit convoluted, not documented well (yet), and generally I don't
recommend it. You rarely want broadcast traffic traversing a VPN.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Brian Josefsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have 2 pfsense boxes, one e
I do agree with Tim. You need two different subnets.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tim Dickson
wrote:
> Just looking at this quickly... looks like you are trying to route two
> networks without having two networks.
> What I mean is you have the same subnet for both of your networks, so the
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> THANK YOU!!!
>
>
>
> --Tim
>
>
> Chris Buechler wrote:
>
>> Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=428
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
>> Fo
THANK YOU!!!
--Tim
Chris Buechler wrote:
Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=428
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support avail
Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=428
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
2009/4/23 Tim Dickson :
> Yes, you'll push the two networks across. It's how I've set it up... maybe
> someone else has more ideas here.
> You may be able to do some custom routing the other way - but two subnets
> will work.
>
Thank you. Will try that when i return to the EU. I just thought
bri
Yes, you'll push the two networks across. It's how I've set it up... maybe
someone else has more ideas here.
You may be able to do some custom routing the other way - but two subnets will
work.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Josefsen [mailto:josef...@sjovedyr.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, April
2009/4/23 Tim Dickson :
> Just looking at this quickly... looks like you are trying to route two
> networks without having two networks.
> What I mean is you have the same subnet for both of your networks, so the
> pfsense boxes don't know whether to route internally or push to the other
> pfsen
Just looking at this quickly... looks like you are trying to route two networks
without having two networks.
What I mean is you have the same subnet for both of your networks, so the
pfsense boxes don't know whether to route internally or push to the other
pfsense box.
You need a separate subnet
Hi
I have 2 pfsense boxes, one embedded on each side of the atlantic
ocean. They connect fine, but i can't contact any of the other side,
both side have the pfsense as a primary gw.
network 192.168.1.0/24
Box local is 192.168.1.241
Box remote is 192.168.1.242
I can only reach the other box with
Including sipproxd in the embedded platform could be a good fit because it's
fundamentally NOT a resource intensive service (unlike some packages (snort)
which would exhaust the limited resources on embedded even if it were an
option).
-K
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Cavanaugh"
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
> Has anyone here successfully run sipproxd on embedded pfSense?
It's built into 1.2.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
embedded does not use packages as the point of embedded was for CompactFlash
installs where users will not want active read/writes since it may/will kill
off the media faster. If you need to use packages, then you need to install
the full version, prefereably on a Hard Drive.
-
Has anyone here successfully run sipproxd on embedded pfSense?
Reading through the sipproxd how-to docs I don't see any mention of
embedded, which usually means (and correct me if I'm wrong) the full
version.
We don't run the full version in many our locations because of the higher
expected r
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Cristiano Deana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i need a pfSense based on 7-STABLE (better) or -CURRENT, to have
> working usb support for apple usb2ethernet device.
> Is it possible to do? Or can i make a patchetd and personalized kernel
> on pfSense?
I will email you off list
Hi,
i need a pfSense based on 7-STABLE (better) or -CURRENT, to have
working usb support for apple usb2ethernet device.
Is it possible to do? Or can i make a patchetd and personalized kernel
on pfSense?
tnx in advance,
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
> -Original Message-
> From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:curtislamast...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:18 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can captive portal
> authenticate based on windows login
>
> Barracuda bases logins 100% on IP add
Barracuda bases logins 100% on IP address when used as a transparent
proxy. User opens browser and looks at google.com, the barracuda gets
IP information from the Audit of login/logout on the domain controller
and associates a users. The barracuda checks the user against a group
and then allows o
19 matches
Mail list logo
