On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
That's all understandable when speaking of errors and packet loss, but
would
it really cause the CPU hit 100% at 50kpps?
both em0 and em1?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
*From:* Lenny [mailto:five2one.le...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* July 29, 2009 3:38 PM
Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
I would try to swap cables and interfaces in config and see errors. Do they
go to em0?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
10kpps - 20% CPU
50kpps - 100% CPU
looks like we have some logic here. I've looked at my graphs - there is no
relation between cpu load and pps. Do you have this relation? Not talking
about your
This is a good example, why bottom-posting sucks...
Why do i need to scroll past all previous teks i read just few seconds
ago, following that thread?
If i need to read it, then i could scroll down, but rarely there is need
for that.
--
Veiko
iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009
I think that top-posting is better or simpler
top-posting is more natural, everything in the nature that is newer
is on the top ... this is what we as first see
on the other hand we are more trained to read from top to bottom,
the newest words in a message are on the bottom...
we write from top
Hi,
I have just posted a help request on pfSense Forum but I don't know if
this list is watching the forum itself and all help is appreciated.
I have built a simple FailOver Scenario but I can't get it to work.
I know I need to add a FailOver Pool and Add rules to the LAN
Interface and
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:08:38PM +0300, Veiko Kukk wrote:
This is a good example, why bottom-posting sucks...
God gracious help us. What's wrong with interleaved
posting?
Why do i need to scroll past all previous teks i read just few seconds
ago, following that thread?
Because they're
Hello every one.
While adding a new queue after wizard is created I want to see data passing
through this queue but rrd graph do not display information about that so
from where can I get that information.
I curiously waiting for your reply..
All suggestion will be appreciated.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in the past, not with the recent setup. As far as I understood it
doesn't help much in the latest releases of FreeBSD.
It can if you're getting killed by interrupts but that doesn't seem to
be the case.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in the past, not with the recent setup. As far as I understood it
doesn't help much in the latest releases of FreeBSD.
It can if
From: Lenny [mailto:five2one.le...@gmail.com]
Sent: July 30, 2009 3:28 AM
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
From:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Weird, I do not have any relation between cpu and bandwidth/packets:
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/4127/bandwidth.png
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/8375/cpu.png
From: Lenny [mailto:five2one.le...@gmail.com]
Sent: July 30, 2009 9:16 AM
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Weird, I do not have
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
My traffic spike is between em and bge interfaces... I have another box
with two bge interfaces with load peaking at 250Mb/s and packets 24kpps and
there I have cpu-bandwidth relation.
If you do not mind
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
My traffic spike is between em and bge interfaces... I have another box
with two bge interfaces with load peaking at 250Mb/s and packets 24kpps and
there I have cpu-bandwidth relation.
If you do not mind
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Eugen Leitleu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:08:38PM +0300, Veiko Kukk wrote:
This is a good example, why bottom-posting sucks...
God gracious help us. What's wrong with interleaved
posting?
Why do i need to scroll past all previous teks i
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
bce0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) mem
0xc800-0xc9ff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
Are things any better/different if you use the onboard Broadcom NICs instead?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
bce0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) mem
0xc800-0xc9ff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
Are things any better/different if you
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I've never tried with this server. Only with the old one and then
the interrupt was pretty high.
But I remember you and the other guys advised against using Broadcom in
favor of Intel.
Are you suspecting the NIC
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I've never tried with this server. Only with the old one and
then
the interrupt was pretty high.
But I remember you and the other guys
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:24:27 +0300
From: five2one.le...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can't get more than 15kpps.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com
Any word on BGP status. or a simple alternative, until pfsense has BGP
function?
-chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chris Flugstadch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
Any word on BGP status. or a simple alternative, until pfsense has BGP
function?
BGP has existed in system - packages for 2+ years.
Scott
-
To
how did i miss all these packages that were available to install via the
gui.
now i got a lot of fun stuff to play with over the weekend.
thanks, and sorry for being such a nuckle head ;)
-topher
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chris Flugstadch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
--
From: Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 6:18 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status
how did i miss all these packages that were available to install via the
gui.
that's actually
From: Ermal Luçi [mailto:ermal.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: July 25, 2009 5:30 PM
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
What I am trying to understand here is how should it work?
'IGMP proxy' means that it should proxy IGMP-packets. Ok, now I
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com]
Sent: July-30-09 9:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] A note about top vs bottom posting -- please
read and make sure you bottom post on our lists. Thank you.
It's either that or I will stop
intentionally not trimming - see below
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:55 PM,
apiase...@midatlanticbb.comapiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com mailto:curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotta tell
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Veiko Kukkveiko.k...@krediidipank.ee wrote:
This is a good example, why bottom-posting sucks...
Why do i need to scroll past all previous teks i read just few seconds ago,
following that thread?
If i need to read it, then i could scroll down, but rarely there
29 matches
Mail list logo
