Chris
Ended up being a bad cert for ssl.
The ip and port have been saved for a long time :-)
ended up just ssh'ing in and vim over the conf file - removing the
https and port
reboot and voila - back in
Thanks however
Now to figure out why it did not like the wildcart cert we gave it
On
Morgan Reed wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 13:12, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
To set replace an old pfsense box, I bought a PC with an Intel
Pro/1000 NIC onboard (em). In my inventory, I have a 3com 905 (xl) and a
Dlink 538-tx (rl). Which one of th 3com or Dlink should I use to
Good morning,
Saturday, we had a power outage in a closet where some of our networking and
wireless gear is housed. This closet was also the location of one of our major
pfSense Captive portal devices. We could not get this device back online.
When I arrived on station this morning, I
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
Hi!
I have two pfSense boxes connected to the same net segment where we
have 4-10Mb/s (up to 5kps) stream of small udp multicast packets.
pfSense1 is connected to this segment via VLAN (em3) - this pfSense
is overloaded.
pfSense2 is connected to
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
3com 905 (xl)
I'd put this on your WAN and the intel on the LAN. 3Com have been
well support in FreeBSD (and even in the original 4.2BSD before that)
forever.
For a long while, back in the early early days of PC's running
Hi,
I'm the same guy that had that long thread about not being able to push
more than 15kpps.
Well, this is sort of a report + some additional questions.
Anyway, eventually we purchased an IBM x3550 server with 2 Quad Core
CPUs (5230 I think).
Now I can push 310Mb, which is about
Vick Khera wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
3com 905 (xl)
I'd put this on your WAN and the intel on the LAN. 3Com have been
well support in FreeBSD (and even in the original 4.2BSD before that)
forever.
For a long while, back in the early early days
Good Afternoon,
I have a pfSense box that has 2 WAN interfaces and 1 LAN interface.
I need to be able to send some specific mail traffic out over OPT1 (the
second WAN link) depending on the IP that it is destined for. The vast
majority of the mail needs to go out over the WAN but a few
All you need to do is create a PASS rule that matches the traffic, and
select the gateway for the WAN you want it to go out. Make sure it
appears before any catch-all rules in the list.
Keenan
Quoting Ron Lemon rjle...@gmail.com:
Good Afternoon,
I have a pfSense box that has 2 WAN
Do I create this rule on the WAN or OPT tab under Firewall rules?
Do I need to enable AON or should I leave automatic?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Keenan Tims [mailto:kt...@gotroot.ca]
Sent: November-02-09 6:57 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Sending
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
3com 905 (xl)
I'd put this on your WAN and the intel on the LAN. 3Com have been
well support in FreeBSD (and even in the original 4.2BSD before that)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Ron Lemon rjle...@gmail.com wrote:
Do I create this rule on the WAN or OPT tab under Firewall rules?
Where ever the traffic is initiated (LAN probably).
Do I need to enable AON or should I leave automatic?
Automatic.
12 matches
Mail list logo
