On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Gabriel - IP Guys
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have multiple ISP’s connected to my pfSense box, but only the ISP that is
> configured as the WAN seems to be able to route traffic. Attempts to come
> into ISP configured on OPT1 seem to make it to the firewall, get th
I also can vouch for the commercial support.
The team understands that you most likely have others who are waiting for you
to fix this... and its not just you.. but its many that need the support... and
your just the gateway.
Much much better than the sonic boom i got when I found out the poor
Dear All,
I have multiple ISP's connected to my pfSense box, but only the ISP that
is configured as the WAN seems to be able to route traffic. Attempts to
come into ISP configured on OPT1 seem to make it to the firewall, get
through, but I see a entry in the firewall saying that a packet from t
Commercial support is top notch. We had an obscure issue with Xenserver, but
it was only affecting a subset of our users who had a VPN connection. I
thought it was a VPN issue, so the pfsense guys worked with me all the way down
to a detailed packet analysis. They gave me great information th
This begs the question what can snort be run on? As I experienced, the pig
fended off 2 intrusions - something in the porn arena - during the first few
hours. That's pretty useful.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:millenia2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:18 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Old Firebox question
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:18:13 -0800
> From: tjdres
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:18:13 -0800
> From: tjdres...@gmail.com
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Support] Old Firebox question
>
> Hi folks,
>
> In a former like I replaced an overworked Firebox with an IPCop
> installation (this was before
Hi,
You mean the one they had on the front of the watchguard firebox 2 and 3 models?
They replicated those in the wsm ui.
In the Firebox X series they have a sort of star interpretation instead of the
triangle.
You could flip the role of the primary lan and wan interface on that one to
show a
Hi folks,
In a former like I replaced an overworked Firebox with an IPCop
installation (this was before I knew about pfSense, all my firewalls
are now pfSense now.
Anyways... the only thing I miss about that Firebox was this cool
little graphical traffic graph that updated in real time. On one si
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, mehma sarja wrote:
> 1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF
> card. The firmware and all have been updated.
I installed on a WRAP 2-ethernet system at my home the Nov 3 snapshot
on Nov 3. I applied the boot sector patch as outlined
* cost
you can build as many pfsense boxes as you like without incurring any
costs, or any additional costs over a single support fee
you can keep cheap PC-type spares around, with cisco keeping spares
duplicates hardware and license costs
software upgrades are free
hardware upgrades are at com
Hans Maes wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, although I didn't try it in the end.
> A working fix was posted on the forum yesterday (
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20405.msg107813.html#msg107813 )
>
> -> You need to set the bios power management mode to APM on the alix
> boards with
>Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:35:39 -0800
>From: mehmasa...@gmail.com
>To: support@pfsense.com
>Subject: [pfSense Support] Is your embedded pfsense stable?
>
>1.2.3-RC3, nanobsd on a Netgate Alix board with 256 MB RAM and a 8GB CF card.
>The firmware and all have been>updated.>
>
>Have been playing
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Try this
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
Thanks for the suggestion, although I didn't try it in the end.
A working fix was posted on the forum yesterday (
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20405.msg107813.html#msg107813 )
-> You need to s
14 matches
Mail list logo
