Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Bruce B wrote: > Next time, when you change the LAN interface subnet just don't press APPLY. > It actually gives you a RED notice to go ahead and change DHCP server range > as well and then come back and press APPLY. Still the same. --

Re: [pfSense Support] L7 queue seems not to work

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, bsd wrote: > > No one has any feedback on L7 that and v.2.0.RC1 ? > It doesn't work. At least apparently unless manually compiled. There is a ticket open on it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-

Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

In 2.x the notice says press apply, THEN go change DHCP. I've tried it both ways w/o success. Again, I'll caveat this by saying that I didn't wait around, perhaps long enough for the Alix to come back. And that could be the cause of my confusion. Mehma === On 4/29/11 6:00 PM, Bruce B wrote: Ne

Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

Next time, when you change the LAN interface subnet just don't press APPLY. It actually gives you a RED notice to go ahead and change DHCP server range as well and then come back and press APPLY. That is what happens with pfSense 1.2.3 If that is not the case with pfSense 2.x then the developers

Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

On 4/29/11 2:05 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mehma Sarja > wrote: Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy. WHAT I DID With DHC

Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: >> >> Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x >> network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy. >> >> WHAT I DID >> With DHCP enabled and servin

Re: [pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: > Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x > network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy. > > WHAT I DID > With DHCP enabled and serving on 192.168.1.x, tried to change LAN ip using > the web GUI.

[pfSense Support] A REALLY Simple Question, Really

Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy. WHAT I DID With DHCP enabled and serving on 192.168.1.x, tried to change LAN ip using the web GUI. I can guess why it does not work - DHCP is trying to serve on

Re: [pfSense Support] L7 queue seems not to work

Le 29 avr. 2011 à 19:08, bsd a écrit : > Le 29 avr. 2011 à 09:37, bsd a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I have created a simple L7 container where I have put SIP and SkypeOut >> traffic. >> >> Then created a Queue called VoIP where this traffic is supposed to end (HFSC >> with 10% reserved). >> >>

Re: [pfSense Support] L7 queue seems not to work

Le 29 avr. 2011 à 09:37, bsd a écrit : > Hi, > > I have created a simple L7 container where I have put SIP and SkypeOut > traffic. > > Then created a Queue called VoIP where this traffic is supposed to end (HFSC > with 10% reserved). > > Then two floating rule to put all traffic (TCP and U

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense as subordinate CA

On 24/03/2011 10:01, Fuchs, Martin wrote: Well thats not exactly what i want to do... I want pfsense to be its own subordinate ca that's authenticated by the windows ca. This way it would be possible for me to use the pfsense ca for all ssl issues on the pfsense and would not have to use the w

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense as subordinate CA

On 24/03/2011 10:01, Fuchs, Martin wrote: Well thats not exactly what i want to do... I want pfsense to be its own subordinate ca that's authenticated by the windows ca. This way it would be possible for me to use the pfsense ca for all ssl issues on the pfsense and would not have to use the w

[pfSense Support] L7 queue seems not to work

Hi, I have created a simple L7 container where I have put SIP and SkypeOut traffic. Then created a Queue called VoIP where this traffic is supposed to end (HFSC with 10% reserved). Then two floating rule to put all traffic (TCP and UDP) in and selected the VoIP L7 container I have created.