On 10/15/10 8:12 PM, li...@mgreg.com wrote:
Hi All,
Having a bit of a problem wrapping my head around a particular network setup.
Basically the scenario is as follows:
-- 1 ISP (Cable Internet Provider)
-- 5 Available static IPs
-- 1 Cable Modem
-- 1 Generic PC with 2 NICs (running
On 8/31/10 7:33 AM, David Burgess wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dane Reugger d...@downtownpc.com wrote:
I'm a long time fan of PfSense but several concepts elude me ... so I
was hopping somebody had a VoIP QoS for PfSense how-to they could
point me at.
The single most important
On 8/10/10 9:58 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Joe Laffey j...@laffey.tv wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Joe Laffey wrote:
I am trying to connect to a pfsense 1.2-RC1 box from an Android (Droid-X)
phone.
I set up the PPTP as described in the docs. I have the ips all
Matias wrote:
El 01/06/10 18:09, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
El 01/06/10 17:14, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
El 01/06/10 17:00, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
Hi,
I've an internet connection on which my ISP provides a /29 network,
just one IP for my
On 5/31/10 1:43 PM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If the port forwards are on the WAN addresses themselves, to my knowledge
they will not fail over. My understanding is that all addresses (and port
forwards) that you intend to survive a failover must be on CARP addresses.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
On 5/31/10 1:58 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
*snip*
The port forward to .65 works, but the .69 does not. If the machines
failover (.69 becomes the active machine), the forward for .69 works,
but the .65 does not. When .65 comes back up as the active box, the
forward on .69 stops working.
Greetings.
I finally set up a failover box for CARP. And so far, everything seems
to be working fine, with one minor detail.
WAN IP range: .65 - .96
.66 - .68 are setup as CARP
.65 and .69 are the WAN interfaces
Port forwards on .65 and .69
The problem:
When this was a single machine, I had
Can Burak Cilingir wrote:
*snip*
if there is no pfsense involved, it works. As i do not have any other
machine in the lan, i just can test by qurying the lips from the machine
itself:
*snip*
Hmm, well my first impression is incorrect then.
I'd Enable packets blocked by the default rule
Can Burak Cilingir wrote:
* [lan ip 155] assigned statically (eth1)
* [lip 156] assigned statically (eth1:1)
* [lip 157] assigned statically (eth1:2)
* (eth0 is down)
*snip*
The problem
when I try to resolve a domain name from outside with
host www.mydomain.com
Adam Van Ornum wrote:
Ok, I am pretty inexperienced with IP addressing, particularly when it comes to
configuring firewalls with multiple public IPs, but at my small business I'm
the most experienced with IT stuff in general so I get to be the one who deals
with all this stuff. We have
Greetings. Have a newbie question on carp and fail over setup. I have
searched and searched around, but my googlefu must be weak as most of
what I've found covers multi-WAN and load balancing, which is not what
I'm after.
I have looked at the following:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Justin The
Cynicalcyni...@penguinness.org wrote:
*snip*
Well shoot, that kills off implementing a fail over for me as I make use of
all the IP's.
You can still use all the IPs, but the two that are tied to the
individual firewalls
Greetings.
1.2-RELEASE built on Sun Feb 24 17:04:58 EST 2008
VIA C3 Samuel 2 800 MHz
512 MB system RAM (16 taken by the ^%$%^ built-on AGP video chipset)
40 gigs HD space (spare laptop drive from a dead iBook)
Current 'router/firewall' device: WRT54G V2.1 running DD-WRT v23sp2
My questions:
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
