On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:09 PM, mayak-cq wrote:
> My Lord,
>
> You're a genius!
>
> Nuking the the interface declaration solves it!!
>
> Intermediate solution yes, but a solution nonetheless!
Amen!
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> Is there a reason the i386 build log uses EST and the AMD64 log uses UTC?
> - Yehuda
Is there a reason? No.
I just fixed it, however. In this day and age a lot of us have
gotten used to GMT and didn't even think twice about it.
Scott
---
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Moshe Katz wrote:
> And the other side of the
> coin: http://bsd.slashdot.org/story/10/12/15/1524202/BSD-Coder-Denies-Adding-FBI-Backdoor
> Moshe
Here is more information on this situation.
http://maycontaintracesofbolts.blogspot.com/2010/12/openbsd-ipsec-backdoo
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> That is a good question. The 2.0 installer uses pc-sysinstaller
> which I am not entirely sure if it takes into account this or not.
Sorry, I meant 2.1 here, not 2.0.
> However I am looking at adding this utility to the pc-sys
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:07 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> Is the 2.0 installer aware of 4k sector discs, and does it align its
> partitions accordingly?
>
> I realize better SSD controllers have minimized the effects of
> partition boundary misalignment, but I still prefer to introduce as
> little en
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
> > It's probably looking for a package file that doesn't exist. Did this
> > ever work before?
>
> It's the first time I've tried PFS on 64-bit.
>
> > I'm not sure if there are any 64-bi
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Aarno Aukia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just found out my new mac os x 10.6 snow leopard machine seems to
> have problems with DNS TTL 0, dnsmasqs default TTL for local entries
> (http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/os-x-operating-system/164649-snow-leopard-keeps-dropping-dn
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
> Please call me 416 479 0606
>
Pardon us but who is supposed to call you?
Scott
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
> I'd argue that it is the role of the user to advocate for desired features,
> regardless of what price was paid for the software. The fact that IPv6
> support doesn't seem to be finished yet is an issue that gains significance
> every
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Aarno Aukia wrote:
> Thanks for committing,
Committed. Thanks for submitting.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfse
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Aarno Aukia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> bgpd is started twice when booting on 1.2.3-release with the newest
> package. I suspect once from /usr/local/pkg/openbgpd.inc and once from
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bgpd.sh ? When commenting out the exec("bgpd") in
> /usr/local/pkg/op
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Yes but:
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,21606.0.html
That and the fact that our snapshot server is up and down (currently
DOWN) due to bad hardware. It will be swapped out in the next coming
days.
Scott
--
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:02 AM, David Newman wrote:
> Greetings. I'd welcome recommendations for which pfSense image to
> install on this system, which currently runs OpenBSD:
>
> Nexcom 1563
> VIA 667-MHz CPU
> 512 Mbytes RAM
> 512-Mbyte disk-on-chip (not CF) storage
> 3 x 100Base-T Ethernet
>
>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Trevor Benson wrote:
> I noticed that when creating a CARP virtual that it requires it to be
> attached to an interface with the same network. However when creating a
> proxy arp, it does not have this requirement. Wouldn't it be logical to
> allow them to hav
http://live.twit.tv
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> We have a plugin that is acting up quite a bit suddenly (snort)
> on reboot the system works for a few minutes - but then nothing
>
> We cannot gain access to the web interface @ all.
>
> Does anyone know how to disable a plugin via ssh ?
>
>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP
>
> Has someone done the first step what would be kind enough to put the
> resulting image available for download? I worked a few hours on this before
> discovering that article, and
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I know it is cosmetic but it is easy to fix, please do it.
>
> 1) Status has two "OpenBGPD Routing" sections, one of them should be renamed
> to "Forwarding" as it shows fib not rib.
> 2) "OpenBGPD IP" section returns error
>
> missing arg
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oliver Hansen wrote:
> Sorry if I'm missing it somewhere but is there a changelog between 1.2.3-RC3
> and 1.2.3-RELEASE? The notes in the blog post seem to reference anything
> that changed since 1.2.2.
Complete list of changes is here:
https://rcs.pfsense.org/pro
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> I don't believe there were any changes between RC3 and release though?
> It's been a while since the image size changed.
Yes, there where a couple NanoBSD fixes. One in particular was on Thu
Sep 10 18:50:55 2009 -0400
Scott
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:04 PM, mitch wrote:
> Same error I'm afraid, status at top says something went wrong updating the
> fstab entry,
>
> Log still reports same error message.
Please see my response here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20347.msg108712.html#msg108712
In a nutshell,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, RB wrote:
> Well, for posterity's sake then: if you have trouble in
> pfSense/FreeBSD with traffic not passing through an Intel 10/100 NIC
> (fxp), particularly when return/inbound packets aren't showing up in
> mpd or another user-level program, turn off TCP Offlo
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:21 PM, RB wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:29, Tim Dressel wrote:
>> For me the issue was exactly like you are describing. Can connect and
>> everything appears OK, but just zero traffic flow. Nothing useful in logs.
>> Then all of a sudden it would start passing traf
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Cristian wrote:
> Thank you.
> But is version 2.0 now is available
Yes, but it is alpha-alpha (soon to be alpha): http://snapshots.pfsense.org/
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Ron García-Vidal wrote:
> I realize this is a support forum, so if there is a better place to post
> this, I will take it there.
>
> So, I'm trying to get a pfsense box in the shop because I've enjoyed working
> with it on my own setup. The boss is fairly open-mind
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I have a machine that was setup as embedded but now we need packages
> functional so I need to migrate it to install based. Given it's the very
> same server, can I simply restore the xml config from the embedded install
> w/o issue?
Extr
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Lenny wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Does it have to be 1.2.3? Because I have 1.2.2 installed right now.
> Should I upgrade before that?
yes, we are moving on to 1.2.3 shortly and 1.2.2 is fading into the sunset.
Scott
--
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> OK, give me a bit to get it ready. Should be back to you in a couple hours.
Lenny,
First of all make sure you backup your configuration and have
installation media handy (just in case).
Run this from a shell (option 8):
fetch -o /b
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Lenny wrote:
> I sure would.
> Thanks.
OK, give me a bit to get it ready. Should be back to you in a couple hours.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For addition
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Lenny wrote:
>
> # iperf -c 2.2.2.11 -t 1200 -i 10 -w 75000
>
>
>
> Client connecting to 2.2.2.11, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 73.5 KByte (WARNING: requested 73.2 KByte)
> ---
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Does the PFI work with a floppy? I tried it, but saw a read error for the
> floppy but I am sure there is nothing wrong with the floppy, is it just not
> supported?
It should work if it is formatted as MS-DOS. Or at least it did previou
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:08 PM, luismi wrote:
> As far as I see right now in the web: live support is offline
Looks online here: https://portal.pfsense.org/
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For a
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> varnish also works in 32bit FreeBSD.
> At least for test-purposes, it did for me.
> You have to limit the amount of RAM it grabs, though, or it will crash
> immediately.
Even with enough memory it can cause a deadlock on FreeBSD... been
th
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Paul Mansfield
wrote:
> I'd be very interested if there was a project to add varnish reverse proxy
> to pfsense. It claims to be both linux and freebsd compatible.
>
> http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/
>
> One could of course hack it in manually but having it as e
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Lenny wrote:
> Lenny wrote:
>
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
>
> Contact me off list. I have a kernel I need you to test.
>
>
> In the meantime, please try increasing these sy
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Lenny wrote:
> At second thought, to get rid of the errors I told you about, I did 2
> things:
> added this to /boot/loader.conf:
> hw.em.rxd="4096"
> hw.em.txd="4096"
>
> and added to /etc/sysctl.conf:
> dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit=1000
> dev.em.1.rx_processing_l
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Contact me off list. I have a kernel I need you to test.
In the meantime, please try increasing these sysctl's:
pfSense:~# sysctl -a | grep rx_processing_limit
dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100
dev.em.1.rx_processing_limit: 100
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Lenny wrote:
> Now I'm totally lost:(
>
> I had this long thread this year on this issue here and eventually the only
> thing the guys could advise me is to buy a newer server. I did. And while I
> do see an improvement in performance (it's about twice it was befo
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> Any clue how to remove an ip that is blocked w/o having the gui ?
> We uninstalled but still have some IP's blocked -
> Reinstalled - same thing
Try /usr/local/sbin/expiretable -v -t 1 virusprot
Scott
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> No such luck
>
> Scott - if it helps - you guys had us (via paid support) upgrade to the rc
> version due to BGP implementation
BTW: did the error message change after reinstalling the package with
my changes?
Scott
-
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> No such luck
>
> Scott - if it helps - you guys had us (via paid support) upgrade to the rc
> version due to BGP implementation
Thanks, I will forward this to the snort maintainer. Maybe he can help.
Scott
--
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> Grace and Peace Friends:
> In Snort we are seeing the following:
> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
> allocate 74957108 bytes) in /usr/local/pkg/snort.inc on line 1488
> When we attempt to see if there are
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Pete Boyd wrote:
> Why are captive portal accounts automatically deleted when they expire?
>
> To my mind, it would be more useful if they were left in place, but expired,
> so that to re-enable them for the admin person was an easy task of just
> choosing a new exp
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As of late, pfsense somehow maps dns entries intended for remote hosts to
> my local samba server. When I try to SSH to a clients network I'm logged
> into my office file server. I'm not sure what else to write here so
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I all of a sudden am getting syntax errors in the logs which I don't recall
> seeing before with respect to a few generic block rules I have on an opt
> interface.
>
> Action: Reject
> Interface: OPT2
> Protocol: Any
> Source: Any
> Destina
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Yes, sorry. It was about 100Mb/s
During heavy load what does this sysctl show?
sysctl net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Thanks I will. 20 Mbit/s is nothing though...
I agree but you failed to mention how much traffic you are pushing.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pf
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Yesterday it happened twice on one of my production firewalls. CPU load was
> less than 10%. Did not pay attention at the moment but accoring to RRD
> number of states was not unusual - 4-5k. I reproduced it in my lab - only
> test connect
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Aarno Aukia wrote:
> Replying to myself, sorry.
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 16:21, Aarno Aukia wrote:
>> I would propose to compare the "old" {$g['vardb_path']}/routes.db to
>> the current set of configured static routes and "route delete" the
>> superfluous routes
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
wrote:
> Is this in any way changeable? If it's a configfile or so...
Unfortunately it is not. I will look into what is required to change
once I catch up on a few other outstanding projects.
Scott
--
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Matthias Niggemeier wrote:
> Any news on this topic? It takes 2-12 hours for my load balancer pools to go
> offline;
> unfortunately I cannot go back to 1.2.2 since some VoIP connections do not
> work with
> 1.2.2.
> Is there a URL that can be geted regularly to res
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM, ozan ucar wrote:
> to abandon.
>
> Install pfsense embedded image on 4 GB CF disk, how to i resize image.
> I search script for 4 GB resize image , can you send me CF disk resize ( 4
> GB ) script ?
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_2/pfSense_RELENG_1_
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Fabian Abplanalp
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to setup pfSense with SpamD (Greylisting and tarpit). In the
> first setup with the "real" Mailserver behind the NAT it works perfectly,
> but if I setup the forwarding to a server with a "public" IP no mails are
> forward
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Well, I am sorry for confusion... but could you please confirm that this is
> from 2.0 filter.inc, starting at line 1961:
> if ($type == "pass") {
> if (isset($rule['allowopts']))
>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> May I send you screenshot?
It will not do any good. I just downloaded 1.2.2 from:
ftp://reflection.ncsa.uiuc.edu/pub/pfSense/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-1.2.2.tgz
[su:~/Desktop/pfSense-Full-Update-1.2.2] sullrich% cd usr/local/www/
[su
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> probably it is fixed in the latest snapshots but in 1.2.3-RC2 built on Mon
> Aug 31 06:09:28 UTC 2009 it is a problem.
> If you disable IPSec tunnel SPD entries for this tunnel are not removed.
> I was struck by this problem b
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Luke Jaeger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any known issues with quad NIC cards on a pfSense box?
>
> I'm looking at a Proliant DL360 G3 with an Intel Pro 1000 GT Quad Port
> adapter
>
> http://www.intel.com/products/server/adapters/pro1000gt-quadport/pro1000gt-quad
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Then sorry Scott, I do not understand your statement: "Traffic on the
> firewall itself prefers the system routing table. Clients behind the
> firewall will prefer the IPSEC tunnel."
> In my case traffic initiated on the firewall itself
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> So, it is impossible to use IPSec with PPPoE on WAN?
> Eugene
That would be news to me. It should work fine.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfse
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I know it looks stupid, but...
> 1.2.3-RC1
> LAN=10.29.1.19/24
> WAN(PPPoE)=x.x.x.106
>
> remote LAN=10.29.11.1/24
> remote WAN=x.x.x.225
> Tunnel is up.
>
> When I do from pfSense itself ping -S 10.29.1.19 10.29.11.1 everything goes
> we
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jostein Elvaker Haande
wrote:
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pfsense.org
Sorry folks. Our datacenter had a power blip and our UPS battery has died.
One of our switches did not reset correctly after the blip.
We have moved one of our firewalls and all the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Activate sticky option on 1.2.3-RC* installations.
http://snapshots.pfsense.org has the RC3 file.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For addition
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Oliver Hansen wrote:
>
>
> a_subscribti...@fiberby.dk wrote:
>>
>> That immediately reduced the memory use from 50% -22%
>> But as you state, it doesn't solve the underlying problem.
Thanks, I just committed a change to prevent this from being a problem.
Scott
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Trying to install from pfSense-Developers-2.0-ALPHA-ALPHA-20090901-1924.iso
> on HP DL380 G4. MD5 is correct. Tried to burn another CD. Tried to install
> it in VMWare - result is the same.
> I see lots of errors like:
> ...
> /usr/sbin/clog
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Victor Padro wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I wonder if someone could send me the physdiskwrite EXE, because I
> can't access to the m0n0.ch website, I don't know if it's down or what
> is wrong with it, and I am in the middle of a embeded Pfsense install
> here! ;)
>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> If I were to work on it should I install
> http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_2/pfSense_HEAD/livecd_installer/pfSense-Developers-2.0-ALPHA-ALPHA-20090831-1029.iso.gz
> ? As I understand changes would be done in pfSense, pfSense p
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> This is again about igmpproxy.
> As I mentioned earlier to be RFC compliant (RFC 2236 IGMP V2 and 3376 IGMP
> V3) we must send IGMP packets with Router Alert in IP header (RFC 2113).
> It is very easy to code but a problem with pf arises. To
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:15 PM, David Rees wrote:
> I've recently run into the issue described on ticket #1931 and on the
> forum thread below:
>
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/tktview?tn=1931
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,16314.0.html
>
> Even though we only have about 200 port forward
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Jesse Vollmar wrote:
> I tried again this morning to change the allow rule on a vlan
> interface to send traffic out on a gateway other than "default" and
> after about five minutes of working like it should, all traffic
> stopped. Hosts on that vlan could no longe
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Jesse Vollmar wrote:
> Okay I deleted that vlan and now there is a system error and the web gui
> doesn't work. I'm on my phone now (no internet from pfsense). The error is
> "xml error: opt cannot occur more than once". I opened a shell and then
> opened config
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Chris
Kleeschulte wrote:
> I can dhcp relay all my hosts except for Windows-based hosts.
> I narrowed the problem down to the Windows machine setting the broadcast
> flag on the dhcp initial request.
> I also know that Microsoft claims this is a problem in Vista, b
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Please take a look at http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,16943.15.html
> last post from the6thday.
> It seems after reinstalling igmpproxy package he still has old version
> (which does not have this commit
> https://rcs.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there, what this problem?
>
> Enter an option: 8
>
> tcsh: Cannot open /etc/termcap.
> tcsh: using dumb terminal settings.
> #
>
> I don't change nothing, and this message appear in my two
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Send a merge request to mainline. If you do not succeed i will merge
> it manually.
Item has been merged. Thanks!
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Ian Levesque wrote:
> php: /xmlrpc.php: Disallowing CARP sync loop.
>
You have a CARP sync loop. You do not want to do that.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For a
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> How should I configure pfsync if I want to use three machines?
>
> ##
> Synchronize to IP
> Enter the IP address of the firewall you are synchronizing with.
> ##
>
> Should I list there all IP-s I want to sync to? Separated by commas or
No.
Pu
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Again me -(((
> found one more bug in OpenBGPD. When you add/modify neighbor which does not
> belong to any group you get excessive } in bgpd.conf after neighbor{} block.
>
> # diff -rub openbgpd.inc.20090816.bak openbgpd.inc
> --- openbgpd
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> 1) When a BGP group is in use it is impossible to modify group's parameters.
> Click 'Save' gives you "Sorry this group is in use... and can not be
> deleted"
> Probably it is intended behavior but then we have to change the error
> message
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I do not know why but your commit put my piece of code in slightly wrong
> place (1 line higher than needed).
> Please correct this. Thanks.
[snip]
Fixed, thanks!
-
To
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> You could use a different browser for pfsense. It's an inconvenience,
> but probably more convenient than closing all your tabs.
Install the "Web Developer Toolbar" for firefox and then select
Miscellaneous -> Clear Private Data -> HTTP Authe
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
>>
>> cd /usr/ports/devel/git && make install
>>
>> -- Ends with
>> ===> Configuring for git-1.6.4
>> ===> Building for git-1.6
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
>
> cd /usr/ports/devel/git && make install
>
> -- Ends with
> ===> Configuring for git-1.6.4
> ===> Building for git-1.6.4
> GIT_VERSION = 1.6.4
> * new build flags or prefix
> ... many compilations here ...
> http-push.c:14:19: er
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> All my production boxes are 1.2-release so FreeBSD 6.2. But I am planning to
> move to the latest 1.2.3 and I will do it as soon as I find out why my HPs
> hung during high load with 1.2.3-RC1.
> To answer your question - I'd like to make i
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Walter
Kugler wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> About myself:
> I have no great knowledge about FreeBSD. I use mostly the WebGUI of pfSense,
> but i have some years experience on Debian GNU/Linux, including building a
> custom kernel.
>
> My Problem:
> I have bought a new machin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I'll ask very trivial question but please bear with me as I am new here.
> What does 'commited this' mean? Does it mean that it is in
> http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_2/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/livecd_installer/pfSense-1.2.3-200908
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Evgeny
Yurchenko wrote:
> Hi!
> 1) I find it a little bit inconvenient that you can not add a neighbor
> when you do not have any group configured. Suppose I want to add just
> two neighbors without messing with groups set up.
> This small thing solves it:
> # diff
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Matthias Niggemeier wrote:
> Von: Matthias Niggemeier [mailto:m...@thias.de]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. August 2009 08:47
> An: support@pfsense.com
> Betreff: [pfSense Support] Problem with apinger
>
>> Hi there,
>>since the upgrade to 1.2.3-RC2 (July 23) parts of my
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> Any word on BGP status. or a simple alternative, until pfsense has BGP
> function?
BGP has existed in system -> packages for 2+ years.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: sup
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:08:38PM +0300, Veiko Kukk wrote:
>> This is a good example, why bottom-posting sucks...
>
> God gracious help us. What's wrong with interleaved
> posting?
>
>> Why do i need to scroll past all previous teks i read just
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Curtis
LaMasters wrote:
> I actually find that to be annoying to read. However, in the spirit
> of good internetship, I'll oblige. Sorry any problems I may have
> caused. Let me know if I did that correctly.
That looks correct. Unfortunately this is the way mail
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Curtis
LaMasters wrote:
> Gotta tell you guys...this is out right frustrating. Is it the fact
> that I'm using Gmail or that by definition, threading in email is
> broken by design. I would have imagined that the Spamassassin mailing
> list would have eaten all Gm
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Curtis
LaMasters wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM, David Burgess wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Curtis
>> LaMasters wrote:
>>> And this is bottom posting. Correct?
>>
>> Well, I don't think it's top-posting or bottom-posting if you delete
>> a
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:31 PM, wrote:
> Unfortunately Gmail top posts by default. So expecting bottom posting to be
> and to remain the default behavior may be an exercise in futility. proper
> ettiquite or not, some people just bang off replies and figure everything is
> a-ok. This being a r
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Curtis
LaMasters wrote:
> Thanks Scott. I know what top posting is...I just don't know why you
> think I did. I hit reply, type my message and go forth. Didn't think
> it needed to be any harder than that.
I did not think anything -- This is my 1st message to thi
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
http://idallen.com/topposting.html
Thank you
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support av
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Evgeny
Yurchenko wrote:
> Can somebody please say whether pfSense's kernel was compiled with MROUTING
> option or not?
[pfsense-org:tools/builder_scripts/conf] sullrich% pwd
/Users/sullrich/pfSense_GIT/tools/builder_scripts/conf
[pfsense-org:tools/builder_scripts
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Saw that, doesn't have latency or loss though. That's the piece that's
> missing from all the options I've seen.
Maybe this will fit the bill. Kinda expensive.
http://www.ookla.com/linequality.php
Scott
--
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Looking for something, preferably open source but commercial is an
> option, sort of like a host your own private speed test site. The idea
> is when someone connects in via VPN they can easily hit a URL on a
> server across the VPN and click
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ingmar Hupp wrote:
> pfSense 1.2.3-RC1. FreeBSD RELENG_7_2 doesn't have support for this as far
> as I can tell (but FreeBSD HEAD [8.0] does as I've just noticed).
Thanks, I have committed this and snapshots should start building them soon.
Scott
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Ingmar Hupp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems Dell is using a previously unknown revision of that chip in their Mini
> 10v (1010) netbooks, so here's a patch to add support for that revision.
> This probably should also/instead go to FreeBSD kernel. I've built a pfSense
> iso
1 - 100 of 2642 matches
Mail list logo
