Re: [pfSense Support] [DEBUG] Lock recursion detected

2008-04-23 Thread Bill Marquette
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have been testing NAT with UDP and a port range of 10001 - 16383. This is on 1.2 final, embedded on i386. You might want to disable NAT reflection (System-Advanced if my memory serves) if you need to redirect that

Re: [pfSense Support] [DEBUG] Lock recursion detected

2008-04-23 Thread Tortise
: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] [DEBUG] Lock recursion detected On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have been testing NAT with UDP and a port range of 10001 - 16383. This is on 1.2 final, embedded on i386. You might

Re: [pfSense Support] [DEBUG] Lock recursion detected

2008-04-23 Thread Bill Marquette
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As always thank you again Bill Now I think the penny has dropped and I now understand that message Not installing nat reflection rules for a port range 500 duh, yeah :) So yeah, the reflection rules aren't enabled for large