RE: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Russ Bennett
: Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end Russ Bennett wrote: > I probably am over thinking this...I tend to do that often. > > Any how, I believe I am having success > > 1. I created the VIP with the /29 block I was given. > 2. I created the 1:1 208.83.93.19/32 -> 10.0.1.14/3

Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Chris Buechler
Russ Bennett wrote: I probably am over thinking this...I tend to do that often. Any how, I believe I am having success 1. I created the VIP with the /29 block I was given. 2. I created the 1:1 208.83.93.19/32 -> 10.0.1.14/32 3. I created the firewall rule Proto Source PortDestination

RE: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Russ Bennett
s on the same network as this web interface so I shouldn't have to create a static route. I'm stumped. Russ -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:25 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1

Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Russ -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:22 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end Russ Bennett wrote: Hello, I've setup a 1:1 nat and entered in the rules. Nothing was getting t

RE: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Russ Bennett
sting with. Thanks Russ -Original Message- From: Russ Bennett Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 7:59 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end First, Thanks for everyone's help. The nat 1:1 I have WAN 208.83.93.19/32 10.0.1.14/32 Firewall Ru

RE: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-12 Thread Russ Bennett
which are used for router and pfsense box 208.83.93.16/29 Do these ip addresses need to be put in as virtual ip's? Russ -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:22 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]

Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-11 Thread Chris Buechler
Russ Bennett wrote: Hello, I've setup a 1:1 nat and entered in the rules. Nothing was getting through so I looked at the log and I can see the rule getting hit properly except within the log I get the following message The rule that triggered this action is: @45 block drop in log quick all lab

Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-11 Thread Bill Marquette
On Dec 11, 2007 2:43 PM, Russ Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've setup a 1:1 nat and entered in the rules. Nothing was getting > through so I looked at the log and I can see the rule getting hit > properly except within the log I get the following message You are probably seei

Re: [pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-11 Thread Curtis LaMasters
It's sort of hidden. Please make sure you have both a NAT rule, and a firewall rule for each of the ports you would like open. Very basic, but also sometimes easy to miss. The only place to shut that rule off from what I know is under General or Advanced setup "Disable Firewall" in which case yo

[pfSense Support] 1:1 at wits end

2007-12-11 Thread Russ Bennett
Hello, I've setup a 1:1 nat and entered in the rules. Nothing was getting through so I looked at the log and I can see the rule getting hit properly except within the log I get the following message The rule that triggered this action is: @45 block drop in log quick all label "Default block all