> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:23 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
>
> Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) wrote:
>
> >Again from IP 101(many years back so I cou
Agreed topic dropped. The passive approach seems safer.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:23 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) wrote
Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) wrote:
Again from IP 101(many years back so I could be wrong ) What about
pinging the broadcast .. This should highlight some less talkative ips
on the local subnet ? And localise icmp traffic .. Ideal for small
networks ?
Nope. Most machines don't respond t
]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
On 10/24/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> From what I can recall from IP 101 I did years ago .. Pinging a host
> will still reso
On 10/24/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can recall from IP 101 I did years ago .. Pinging a host
> will still resolve an IP to MAC (ARP), the host may not echo the ICMP
> back.. But you should still get an ARP table entry on the requestor.. Am
> I wron
24, 2005 10:55 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
I think it would be better to combine those 2, only using ping can be a
little obscure, what if a user drops icmp packages, and the machine
apears to be down when it is actualy alive?.
What
TED]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 10:55 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
I think it would be better to combine those 2, only using ping can be a
little obscure, what if a user drops icmp packages, and the machine
apears to be down when it
has requested/renewed
its lease?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 2:07 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
On 10/22/05, Imre Ispanovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 2:07 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diagnostics: DHCP leases v0.88
On 10/22/05, Imre Ispanovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that on the &qu
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:07:05 -0500
Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> _all_ of them? Even the one for the machine you are connecting to the
> admin interface from? The "online/offline" comes directly from the
Yes all. Even the one I'm connecting to admin interface. Than was the strange
On 10/22/05, Imre Ispanovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that on the "Diagnostics: DHCP leases" page all static leases
> (I have only this kind) shows as offline.
> I am using v.88 CF image on a PC (Bao's image), but I guess that this is not
> Cf dependent.
_all_ of them? Even
Hi,
I noticed that on the "Diagnostics: DHCP leases" page all static leases
(I have only this kind) shows as offline.
I am using v.88 CF image on a PC (Bao's image), but I guess that this is not
Cf dependent.
Best regards
Imre
--
This is Linux Land.
In silent nights you can hear the windows mac
12 matches
Mail list logo
