Chris Flugstad wrote:
> Paul,
> you want my pap2 version 2? I unlocked it from vonage and i get a
> terrible delay. Cant seem to get rid of the delay so it makes the
> device kinda worthless. unless you know how to get rid of the delay, i
> dont want it ;)
>
I've got three of them (all unlock
Paul,
you want my pap2 version 2? I unlocked it from vonage and i get a
terrible delay. Cant seem to get rid of the delay so it makes the
device kinda worthless. unless you know how to get rid of the delay,
i dont want it ;)
Chris Flugstad
Cascadelink
900 1st ave s, suite 201a
seattle, w
Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
>> Also forgot to note, that most phones will register on port 5060. This
>> however behind a NAT wont work if you have more than 1 phone. You will have
>> to statically configure the port different on each port OR so
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> Also forgot to note, that most phones will register on port 5060. This
> however behind a NAT wont work if you have more than 1 phone. You will have
> to statically configure the port different on each port OR someone phone
> will have a "
mixed messages and not consistent to me.
I'd like to understand what it is that you understand please.
Kind regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Chris Flugstad
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [pfSense Support] sip nat
I use Linksy
m: Chris Flugstad
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [pfSense Support] sip nat
I use Linksys SPA 921 which do a BADASS job of going over NAT. They have a good "keep alive" function that keeps them nice and cozy
behind a nat. We use them
43 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [pfSense Support] sip nat
I use Linksys SPA 921 which do a BADASS job of going over NAT. They have a
good "keep alive" function that keeps them nice and cozy
behind a nat. We use them for our hosted pbx product and havent had any
problems.
Chris Flugstad
Casc
p the good work...
Kind regards Anders
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] På vegne af Chris
Buechler
Sendt: 18. marts 2009 16:03
Til: support@pfsense.com
Emne: Re: [pfSense Support] sip nat
Nearly always, rewriting source port on SIP breaks it so i
l.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] På vegne af Chris
Buechler
Sendt: 18. marts 2009 16:03
Til: support@pfsense.com
Emne: Re: [pfSense Support] sip nat
Nearly always, rewriting source port on SIP breaks it so it's not done
by default. Enable AON and it will be.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:11 A
Nearly always, rewriting source port on SIP breaks it so it's not done
by default. Enable AON and it will be.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:11 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I know this issue have been raised before, but I haven't really found a
> satisfying answer, so here I go again...
>
> My problem is r
Hi
I know this issue have been raised before, but I haven't really found a
satisfying answer, so here I go again...
My problem is related to sip-nat.
I'm running a network with approximately 2000 home users.
I have choosen pfsense back in the 1.0.1 days, and is still very satisfied
with it's pe
11 matches
Mail list logo
