segunda-feira, 27 de Março de 2006 16:07
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
>
> On 3/27/06, Amorim, Nuno Alexandre (ext) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I have pfsense working on two SunFire v20z with two dual intel gigabit
>
.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: segunda-feira, 27 de Março de 2006 16:07
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
On 3/27/06, Amorim, Nuno Alexandre (ext) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have pfsense worki
On 3/27/06, Amorim, Nuno Alexandre (ext) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have pfsense working on two SunFire v20z with two dual intel gigabit NIC
> (copper).
>
> I had this similar problem also. First it was wrong netmasks. Then I had some
> errors in the configuration of the switches (cisco). The
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: segunda-feira, 27 de Março de 2006 2:07
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
Hmmm...what model Intel NICs are these? I'll try and get a couple
boxes together at work as I
carp system with
> Intel gigabit NIC's? (not necessarily with Pfsense only)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 27 March 2006 9:35 a.m.
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pfSe
hat
> I'm experiencing with Intel gigabit NICs. I haven't any spare HW at the
> moment so can't myself.
>
> Simon.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 25 March 2006 7:18 a.m.
> To: support@pfs
27;s? (not necessarily with Pfsense only)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 27 March 2006 9:35 a.m.
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
>
>
bject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
Jan Z is also having problems with these nics. Starting to point to a
driver issue...
On 3/26/06, Simon O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Are you able to test your setup using cards other than Intel Giga
ork.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Março de 2006 0:09
> > To: support@pfsense.com
> > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
> >
> > H
al Message-
From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 25 March 2006 7:18 a.m.
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit confused...
No - this is not the problem. I have quadruple checked all this and it is
consistent and correct.
I have just
On 3/24/06, Peter Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No - this is not the problem. I have quadruple checked all this and it is
> consistent and correct.
>
> I have just tried increasing the advertising frequency on the slave, but
> although it flicked to 'backup' status briefly because of the cha
t;
> I had a similar issue. Verify the netmask of the carp interface. It is the
> same has the network.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Março de 2006 0:09
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pf
On 3/23/06, Peter Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> OK - what is outstanding on the port (apart from the minor bug in the GUI and
> a need for a better way to handle the AES key)?
It currently will communicate with a neighbor but I have not tackled
the openbsd setkey -> freebsd setkey pie
Hello Peter
I had a similar issue. Verify the netmask of the carp interface. It is the same
has the network.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Março de 2006 0:09
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp is a bit
Hi Scott
On Thursday 23 March 2006 23:00, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > I have two boxes in parallel, running with Carp used to service 6
> > addresses in total - 3 on the WAN interface and the remaining 3 spread
> > between 3 internal interfaces. All seems to work OK - when I check the
> > Carp statu
On 3/23/06, Peter Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I got most of my problems of last week sorted - a couple of configuration
> errors is all it takes to get things badly confused.
>
> I am now left with some 'real' errors
>
> I have two boxes in parallel, running with Carp used to servi
16 matches
Mail list logo