You realize that HEAD is the most distant and non-functional of the
branches and is probably the worst possible candidate for re-branding
and release, right?
Ahmed Abdallah wrote:
I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to
PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked bu
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Ahmed Abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to
> PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not
> contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start.
We killed HEAD,
I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git.
Yeah, unless you're an existing committer, you have no access to git
just yet. It's firewalled off from the world until it's less of a test
case and more production ready.
Not so shockingly, there also won't be many too keen on provid
Ok guys, thanks so much for your help so far. And I'm doing that for the
company I work in now, but anyway, Why don't you guys start talking about
having "authorized partners and resellers" if so, I guess my company can be
your first "reseller" :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Buechler <[E
e someone else here would need it ;)
-Tim
--
From: Ahmed Abdallah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:54 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
Ok guys, thanks so much