Op 6-3-2011 23:26, Bao Ha schreef:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
It is not.
When we first got the reports of corrupted CFs, we just overnighted new
ones. Then, those died shortly, within a week or two. We replaced a
complete system:
Hi Seth,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 6-3-2011 23:26, Bao Ha schreef:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
It is not.
I have had three systems with corrupted flash memory: two with the Kingston
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Bao Ha b...@hacom.net wrote:
Something happened in BETA5 and it was carried into RC1, up to today
snapshot: 20110306-0859.
I see this in my embedded BETA5 install at home (I should upgrade soon
to RC1 I suppose...)
I see no significant amount of writing to it.
Someone already made a bugreport http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1279
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1279 ;)
_
Van: Bao Ha [mailto:b...@hacom.net]
Verzonden: zondag 6 maart 2011 23:06
Aan: customersupp...@pfsense.org
CC: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: [pfSense Support]
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
Unfortunately, mounting RW without NOATIME will pounce on the compact flash
everytime a READ is made. It will kill the CF sooner or later.
When we first got the reports of corrupted CFs, we just overnighted
filesystem
Hope this problem will be solved soon!
With regards,
Bart
_
Van: Bao Ha [mailto:b...@hacom.net]
Verzonden: zondag 6 maart 2011 23:26
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 RC1 Nanobsd Problem
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note
On Sun, March 6, 2011 19:26, Bao Ha wrote:
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the note.
According to the forum, it should not be a problem. :-(
Unfortunately, mounting RW without NOATIME will pounce on the compact
flash
everytime a READ is made. It will kill the CF sooner or later.
When we first got