If anyone comes across this on the archives, due to the lack of a
compiler et all I found no way to achieve compiling SA on pfSense
(probably could have compiled in on a FreeBSD box and moved everything
over but that seems too arse-about-tit to me). I have virtualized
pfSense on a CentOS box and
On 21/10/10 14:23, James Bensley wrote:
If anyone comes across this on the archives, due to the lack of a
compiler et all I found no way to achieve compiling SA on pfSense
pfsense is based on freebsd 7.2, get a copy here...
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/7.2-RELEASE/
you
argh, sorry, I didn't see the 2.0 bit... don't know which version it
uses, but the same would apply, use pkg_add and if needed set the env
var so it can find the package repository.
but I would advise grabbing the appropriate version of freebsd and using
that as a build platform rather than
On 21 October 2010 15:07, Paul Mansfield it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
argh, sorry, I didn't see the 2.0 bit... don't know which version it
uses, but the same would apply, use pkg_add and if needed set the env
var so it can find the package repository.
but I would advise grabbing the
So, one step at a time is always a good approach, and I am falling
down at the first step ;)
Its proving awkward to even compile Spam Assassin so I can try it in a
jail as pfSense doesn't have the 'make' command in it, it shows up in
the the FreeBSD ports but I can't compile the source without
Hi,
Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs you
need, that's a good solution. Or you can look at the jailctl package and
run a full jail for spamassassin and whatever else you want to throw on it.
This is in production at one site atleast, a all in one wonder with
Op 13-10-2010 23:55, James Bensley schreef:
Thank you too all for your input.
I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be
nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I
like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my
findings ;)
On 10/13/2010 1:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but doesn't show up in my package list on my 2.0
box, is this the package
On 13 October 2010 19:00, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
You'd be better of installing SpamAssassin on a box that isn't a secure
firewall. :-)
Sadly the isn't an option for me, I'm setting up a network edge box to
run pfSense, SpamAssassin, ClamAV, Squid and Squidgaurd to filter all
traffic
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:22:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin
On 13 October 2010 19:00, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
You'd be better of installing
On Oct 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but doesn't show up in my package list on my 2.0
box, is this the package
On 13 October 2010 19:30, Gordon Russell russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
You may want to look at untangle then.
http://www.untangle.com
I have seen that before but sadly this isn't an option either, we are
a non-profit and although they do discounted prices my budget is
£0.00.. Thats why I
On Oct 13, 2010, at 9:10 PM, James Bensley wrote:
*scratches head* I could virtualise /both/ pfSense and SA on the same
box as separate VMs??!?...again I'd rather not...or would I? Noodle
baker!
Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs
you need, that's a good
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to put Spam Assassin on a pfSense 2.0 box and I see that
here (http://www.pfsense.com/packages/pkg_config.xml) it is listed as
a package to install but
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:10:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin
On 13 October 2010 19:30, Gordon Russell russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
You may want to look
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
The base version of untangle is free
Aside from the hardware, with its considerable bloat, the hardware
available may not be able to accommodate that scenario. Though if the
hardware can run ESXi, putting it on a VM
- Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
The base version of untangle is free
Aside from the hardware, with its considerable bloat, the hardware
available may not be able to accommodate that
Thank you too all for your input.
I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be
nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I
like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my
findings ;)
--
Regards,
James.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Gordon Russell
russ...@clarkecounty.gov wrote:
Why cobble together a VM scenario to do that, when there is packaged, simple,
free software achieve his ends? I don't know that a VM'ed scenario would be
any less resource intensive than untangle. It would
19 matches
Mail list logo
