Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 10/14/12 12:20 pm, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the distributed mirrors, so it's pretty quick. If you'll post a link, I'll test that as well. Not sure what you are aski

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On 10/14/2012 2:18 PM PT, John Thompson typed: Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video bl

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On 10/14/2012 3:24 PM, Rufus wrote: Ant wrote: Hello. Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

John Thompson wrote: On 2012-10-14, Rufus wrote: Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 vide

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Ant wrote: On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed: I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it "fixed it" (like fixing a cat maybe :) ). Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > David E. Ross schrieb: >> I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1 >> checksum. > > FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both > the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verificatio

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On 2012-10-14, Rufus wrote: >> Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not >> Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the >> latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like >> FlashBlock. Ugh! :( >> >> I need a HTML5 video block

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

David E. Ross schrieb: I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1 checksum. FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification with a checksum that is not just SHA-1 but SHA-512

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On Oct 14, 3:31 pm, Ant wrote: > On 10/14/2012 1:24 PM PT, Rufus typed: > > >> Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not > >> Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the > >> latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like > >>

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On 10/14/2012 1:24 PM PT, Rufus typed: Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video blocker li

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed: I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it "fixed it" (like fixing a cat maybe :) ). Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive, associated

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

Ant wrote: Hello. Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! D

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Jim wrote: I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it "fixed it" (like fixing a cat maybe :) ). Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive, associated

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

On 10/14/2012 12:18 PM PT, Ant typed: Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video blocker lik

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 10/14/12 10:37 AM, Steve Wendt wrote: > On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > >> So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have >> received it quickly if they are running slowly. > > The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use > the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Steve Wendt wrote: On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have received it quickly if they are running slowly. The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use the standard HTTP downloads, you get

YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

Hello. Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! :( I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! Does one

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Steve Wendt wrote: > On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > >> So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have >> received it quickly if they are running slowly. > > The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. Indeed and around the time we released

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Jim wrote: > I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton > Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it "fixed it" > (like fixing a cat maybe :) ). > > Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive, > associated with Foxfire and Se

Re: Google News still shows images, after I turned off "load images automatically"

On 10/13/2012 11:24 PM PT, V S Rawat gmoz typed: in ff13, thru Options - contents - I unticked "load images automatically". Since then all other sites, including fb, are indeed dutifully not loading images, however Google news sites http://news.google.co.in/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&edchanged=1&ned=i

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have received it quickly if they are running slowly. The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the

Re: Mail Display Page Headings

James Robinson wrote: > I recently received and updated my SeaMonkey program to ver. 2.13.1, > thru the automatic update notice service, on my Gateway Laptop using > Windows7. > > My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date & To), that were > always immediately above the individual email m

Re: Mail Display Page Headings

James Robinson wrote: I recently received and updated my SeaMonkey program to ver. 2.13.1, thru the automatic update notice service, on my Gateway Laptop using Windows7. My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date & To), that were always immediately above the individual email message bo

Re: 2.13 Problems.

On 10/10/2012 04:25 PM, LR wrote: On Oct 10, 10:10 am, LR wrote: I just installed 2.13 and I'm having some trouble loading some sites. Another problem. I tried to use email and 2.13 doesn't seem to remember my old accounts and is asking me to set up new ones. Suggestions? LR The article

Re: Can't update

On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:26:36 -0700, NoOp wrote: > Robert, any idea why 720619: > > is still block if you are not on the security list? > > You are not authorized to access bug #720619. To see this bug, you must > first log in to an account

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: Jens, great, this page does give some details as to what was done and why, so why isn't this page linked to in the release notification e-mail or news post?? Because we forgot about it (Edmund in this case, but I'm not blaming him since I would probably have fo

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 14/10/12 12.17, Jens Hatlak ha scritto: Gabriel wrote: I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version (OSX) doesn't auto update? Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases. I didn't kn

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Gabriel wrote: I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version (OSX) doesn't auto update? Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases. Do I have to manually install the new 2.13.1 ? If y

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

On 13/10/12 04.12, Edmund Wong ha scritto: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1] now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it delivers the latest developments i

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Daniel wrote: Jens, great, this page does give some details as to what was done and why, so why isn't this page linked to in the release notification e-mail or news post?? Because we forgot about it (Edmund in this case, but I'm not blaming him since I would probably have forgotten just as wel

Re: Mail Display Page Headings

James Robinson wrote: My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date & To), that were always immediately above the individual email message bodies, are no longer there. Does anyone know how or where to correct this? Try playing with View/Headers (especially if you have Mnenhy installed

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: As an experiment, I also went to the SeaMonkey website and downloaded the full version of "SeaMonkey Setup 2.13.1.exe," declared to be 16 MB, but the download manager claimed it was 19.1 MB. When it completed, the download manager reported 19.3 MB, but the Windows propert

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: Link (2) gives the very detailed comment that "Nothing but security fixes" and link (3) just mentions SM 2.13.1 but gives no differences between SM 2.13 and SM 2.13.1 and the wiki page is as good as blank!! Changes between minor versions of a release are only

Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released

Desiree wrote: "Sandy" wrote in message news:y8ednfyynp_lyutnnz2dnuvz_rodn...@mozilla.org... Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update. Why is this? I'm not going to further update SM if I h

Re: Can't update

Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Even so, why would v. 2.12.1 elicit such a dire warning? I was referring to the "Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey". quoted in the original post. And the reply to that is "Because it has some grave security issues t