Re: Address book dosn't run in 2.13.1

2012-10-23 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote, On 22/10/2012 13:05: Ray_Net wrote: Snip I have a mailing list just one without need. But my problem is the same with another one - the modified adress book entry dissappeared after closing SM. Ray, what seems to be happening, in SM 2.13 and 2,13.1, is if you

Re: Disappearing emails - still need help!

2012-10-23 Thread Tom
Tom, completely close SM, including any Quick Start Function, then use your file manager to locate your inbox, i.e. the one that keeps stuffing up. How big is the file?? You mention 50MB and 100MB above, but these figures stagger me!! Whilst you're in the area, delete the inbox.msf file

Re: Disappearing emails - still need help!

2012-10-23 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Tom wrote: All the mailbox compression does, apparently, is remove, from the giant text files, empty lines that apparently remain after an email is deleted -- I suppose that it simply searches for CR/LF characters and removes them. Doesn't really change the file size significantly at all. I

Comparison request

2012-10-23 Thread Mike Easter
Currently there is a discussion^1 in slashdot about SeaMonkey where some longtime SM users are contributing. Once upon a time Chris Ilias had a useful page comparing SM with Tb/Ffx, but it has grown stale http://ilias.ca/SeamonkeyvsFirefox The Differences between SeaMonkey versus Firefox and

Re: Comparison request

2012-10-23 Thread WaltS
On 10/23/2012 03:03 PM, Mike Easter wrote: Currently there is a discussion^1 in slashdot about SeaMonkey where some longtime SM users are contributing. Once upon a time Chris Ilias had a useful page comparing SM with Tb/Ffx, but it has grown stale http://ilias.ca/SeamonkeyvsFirefox The

Re: Comparison request

2012-10-23 Thread Mike Easter
WaltS wrote: Mike Easter wrote: Personally, I am actually most interested in differences between SM and Tb focusing on the news client aspect, not the browser or mail agent. Would any who are currently familiar with Tb SM news care to comment? Shouldn't this be in mozilla.general? I

Re: YouTube.com starts using HTML5 and not Flash?

2012-10-23 Thread Dave Warren
In the last episode of sekdnzvvw-3habjnnz2dnuvz_v6dn...@mozilla.org, Ron Hunter rphun...@charter.net said: I would like that, but there are those who think cookies are the work of the devil. Then they don't get to use that feature, do they? Not really a big deal.