EE wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
If they are attachments, can you not detach
Ed Mullen wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote on 9/21/2015 7:05 PM:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
Edit - Preferences
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
Can you explain further?
Are you
Tom Pamin wrote on 9/21/2015 7:05 PM:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
Just a thought: Click View and see
Ed Mullen wrote on 9/23/2015 9:56 AM:
Tom Pamin wrote on 9/21/2015 7:05 PM:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
Tom Pamin wrote:
EE wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
If they are attachments, can
Tom Pamin wrote:
EE wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
When JPG photos are attached to emails I read using my roadrunner
webmail site, they do not display. I only see a small red x instead of
the photo. These photos display fine using IE. Is there a setting to
change in SM?
If they are attachments, can
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
What is meant by "not functioning
stango wrote on 23/09/2015 17:39:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
What
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 8:14:40 AM UTC-7, Edmund Wong wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm just so stoked. (This isn't a normal release post as it's just way
> to special.)
>
> It is with great privilege and joy that I can announce to the world, the
> SeaMonkey Project has just RELEASED
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
___
On 23/09/2015 22:48, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Any versions below 2.35 are not maintained and have grave publicly
> disclosed security issues.
Even 2.35 may be at risk. It is based on Firefox 38, right?
Some advisories for Firefox 39, 40, and 41 may apply to SM.
For example:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
I don't know for sure, but SM 2.12
Ray_Net schrieb:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
Any versions below 2.35 are not
I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife and I each
use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the other three are used
primarily to display our cameras, and they all have web access.
All five of the computers exhibit the same problem. Select "Help", then
Jay O'Brien wrote on 9/23/2015 11:39 PM:
I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they all
have web access.
All five of the computers exhibit
Jay O'Brien wrote:
I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they all
have web access.
All five of the computers exhibit the same problem.
W dniu 09/24/2015 o 05:47 AM, Ed Mullen pisze:
> Jay O'Brien wrote on 9/23/2015 11:39 PM:
>> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife
>> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the
>> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they
Mason83 wrote:
On 23/09/2015 22:48, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Any versions below 2.35 are not maintained and have grave publicly
disclosed security issues.
Even 2.35 may be at risk. It is based on Firefox 38, right?
Some advisories for Firefox 39, 40, and 41 may apply to SM.
For example:
stango wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
Windows10 after the "big upgrade"
What is meant by "not
On 09/23/2015 06:38 PM, EE wrote:
Mason83 wrote:
On 23/09/2015 22:48, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Any versions below 2.35 are not maintained and have grave publicly
disclosed security issues.
Even 2.35 may be at risk. It is based on Firefox 38, right?
Some advisories for Firefox 39, 40, and 41
On 24/09/2015 1:53 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
stango wrote on 23/09/2015 17:39:
Ray_Net wrote:
My friend accepted the Windows10 upgrade, he was under Windows8
Now, he is under Windows10 and ... the SM mail is not functioning
anymore.
Is it normal that SM-mail "SeaMonkey/2.12.1" doesn't work under
22 matches
Mail list logo
