Daniel Barclay wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics o
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while with
the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of the mail
are change
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to an
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action)
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is not normal tha
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is not normal that the ch
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while
with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of the mail
are changed.
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of the mail
are changed. Someone told us that re
Daniel Barclay wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of the mail
are changed. Someone told us that re
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Most of people doesn't understand this simple problem.
When a mail is moved from one folder to another one (even while with the
delete action) this is not normal that the characteristics of the mail
are changed. Someone told us that resetting the "unread" st
Phillip Jones wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then d
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In 1.x, after
marki
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
If you've a problem with SeaMonkey, please feel free to move on to some
other application. Otherwise file a bug report (or point to an existing
bug report), contribute time to the project. Di
On 06/25/2010 12:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Arnie Goetchius wrote:
>> Rick Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> ,,,
>>>
>>> without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
>>>
>>>
>> That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
>> moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In 1.x
Ray_Net wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In 1.x, after
marking as "unread" and deleting, it is mo
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In 1.x, after
marking as "unread" and deleting, it is moved to Trash and
Rick Merrill wrote:
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
That's not the issue. If you mark as "unread" and then delete, it is
moved to Trash and the status is changed to "read". In 1.x, after
marking as "unread" and deleting, it is moved to Trash and the status
stayed as
,,,
without reading, you can mark "read", then delete.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> if I delete an "unread" message (listed in bold) in the Inbox <<
Suggest looking at the "Message" and "Threads" "View" settings for the
Trash folder.
Both are set for "All" therefore it should show all messages.
Anyway, with SM1
Ray_Net wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> if I delete an "unread" message (listed in bold) in the Inbox <<
Suggest looking at the "Message" and "Threads" "View" settings for the
Trash folder.
Both are set for "All" therefore it should show all messages.
Anyway, with SM1 deleting an "unread" me
27 matches
Mail list logo
